质疑美国妇产科医师学会关于筛查既往糖尿病和早期妊娠糖尿病的临床实践更新。

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005777
Kent D Heyborne, Linda A Barbour
{"title":"质疑美国妇产科医师学会关于筛查既往糖尿病和早期妊娠糖尿病的临床实践更新。","authors":"Kent D Heyborne, Linda A Barbour","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Practice Update continues to recommend targeted (as opposed to universal) screening for pregestational diabetes, no longer recommends screening for early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and provides updated guidelines for immediate postpartum testing for diabetes in patients with GDM. Here, we present data that the targeted screening paradigm, which has repeatedly been shown to fail in practice because of its complexity, no longer makes sense in the context of the high and rising prevalence of diabetes and diabetic risk factors, and we argue that the time has come for universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes. Furthermore, the recommendation against early screening for GDM is based on 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidance, which in turn is based almost entirely on a single underpowered study that excluded individuals at highest risk and does not account for more recent research showing benefits of early diagnosis and treatment. Universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes may also help to identify patients at risk who will benefit from early GDM diagnosis and treatment and may provide rationale for prioritizing postpartum diabetes testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Clinical Practice Update on Screening for Pre-existing Diabetes and Early Gestational Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Kent D Heyborne, Linda A Barbour\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Practice Update continues to recommend targeted (as opposed to universal) screening for pregestational diabetes, no longer recommends screening for early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and provides updated guidelines for immediate postpartum testing for diabetes in patients with GDM. Here, we present data that the targeted screening paradigm, which has repeatedly been shown to fail in practice because of its complexity, no longer makes sense in the context of the high and rising prevalence of diabetes and diabetic risk factors, and we argue that the time has come for universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes. Furthermore, the recommendation against early screening for GDM is based on 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidance, which in turn is based almost entirely on a single underpowered study that excluded individuals at highest risk and does not account for more recent research showing benefits of early diagnosis and treatment. Universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes may also help to identify patients at risk who will benefit from early GDM diagnosis and treatment and may provide rationale for prioritizing postpartum diabetes testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005777\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,美国妇产科医师学会临床实践更新继续推荐对妊娠前糖尿病进行有针对性的(而非普遍性的)筛查,不再推荐对早期妊娠糖尿病(GDM)进行筛查,并提供了对 GDM 患者产后立即进行糖尿病检测的最新指南。在此,我们提供的数据表明,由于其复杂性,有针对性的筛查模式在实践中屡屡失败,在糖尿病和糖尿病危险因素发病率高且不断上升的背景下,这种模式已不再有意义,我们认为,现在是普及妊娠糖尿病早期筛查的时候了。此外,反对早期筛查 GDM 的建议是基于 2021 年美国预防服务工作组的指导意见,而该指导意见又几乎完全是基于一项排除了高危人群的单项低效研究,并没有考虑到最新研究显示的早期诊断和治疗的益处。普及妊娠期糖尿病早期筛查也有助于识别那些将从早期 GDM 诊断和治疗中获益的高危患者,并为优先进行产后糖尿病检测提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenging the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Clinical Practice Update on Screening for Pre-existing Diabetes and Early Gestational Diabetes.

A recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Practice Update continues to recommend targeted (as opposed to universal) screening for pregestational diabetes, no longer recommends screening for early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and provides updated guidelines for immediate postpartum testing for diabetes in patients with GDM. Here, we present data that the targeted screening paradigm, which has repeatedly been shown to fail in practice because of its complexity, no longer makes sense in the context of the high and rising prevalence of diabetes and diabetic risk factors, and we argue that the time has come for universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes. Furthermore, the recommendation against early screening for GDM is based on 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidance, which in turn is based almost entirely on a single underpowered study that excluded individuals at highest risk and does not account for more recent research showing benefits of early diagnosis and treatment. Universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes may also help to identify patients at risk who will benefit from early GDM diagnosis and treatment and may provide rationale for prioritizing postpartum diabetes testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Decreased levels of phosphorylated synuclein in plasma are correlated with poststroke cognitive impairment. Small molecule inhibitor DDQ-treated hippocampal neuronal cells show improved neurite outgrowth and synaptic branching. Polyethylene glycol fusion repair of severed sciatic nerves accelerates recovery of nociceptive sensory perceptions in male and female rats of different strains. Reduced mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor expression by mutant androgen receptor contributes to neurodegeneration in a model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy pathology. Enhanced autophagic clearance of amyloid-β via histone deacetylase 6-mediated V-ATPase assembly and lysosomal acidification protects against Alzheimer's disease in vitro and in vivo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1