婴儿的六氟化硫多次呼吸冲洗和冲洗结果不能互换。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Physiological measurement Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1088/1361-6579/ad8da4
Anne-Christianne Kentgens, Florian Wyler, Marc-Alexander Oestreich, Philipp Latzin, Sophie Yammine
{"title":"婴儿的六氟化硫多次呼吸冲洗和冲洗结果不能互换。","authors":"Anne-Christianne Kentgens, Florian Wyler, Marc-Alexander Oestreich, Philipp Latzin, Sophie Yammine","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ad8da4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Sulfur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>) multiple-breath washout (MBW) assesses ventilation inhomogeneity, as an early marker of obstructive respiratory diseases. Primary outcomes are customarily washout-derived, and it is unclear whether the preceding SF<sub>6</sub>-washin can provide similar estimates. We aimed to assess comparability of primary SF<sub>6</sub>-MBW outcomes between washin and washout phases of infant SF<sub>6</sub>-MBW data measured with the WBreath (ndd Medizintechnik AG, Zurich, Switzerland) and Spiroware (Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland) MBW-setups, respectively.<i>Approach.</i>We assessed mean relative differences in lung clearance index (LCI) and functional residual capacity (FRC) between the washin and washout of existing SF<sub>6</sub>-MBW data from healthy infants and infants with cystic fibrosis (CF). We assessed whether these differences exceeded the mean relative within-test between-trial differences of washout-derived outcomes, which can be attributed to natural variability. We also explored non-physiological factors using a pediatric lung simulator.<i>Main results.</i>LCI and FRC from washin and washout were not comparable, for both setups. The mean difference (SD) in LCI between washin and washout was 2.3(10.8)% for WBreath and -9.7(8.0)% for Spiroware, while in FRC it was -4.7(8.4)% for WBreath and -2.3(9.7)% for Spiroware. These differences exceeded the within-test between-trial differences in washout-derived outcomes. Outcomes from washin and washout were also not comparable in a pediatric lung simulator.<i>Significance.</i>Outcomes of the washin and washout were not comparable due to an interplay of physiological and non-physiological factors, and cannot be used interchangeably.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sulfur hexafluoride multiple breath washin and washout outcomes in infants are not interchangeable.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Christianne Kentgens, Florian Wyler, Marc-Alexander Oestreich, Philipp Latzin, Sophie Yammine\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6579/ad8da4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Sulfur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>) multiple-breath washout (MBW) assesses ventilation inhomogeneity, as an early marker of obstructive respiratory diseases. Primary outcomes are customarily washout-derived, and it is unclear whether the preceding SF<sub>6</sub>-washin can provide similar estimates. We aimed to assess comparability of primary SF<sub>6</sub>-MBW outcomes between washin and washout phases of infant SF<sub>6</sub>-MBW data measured with the WBreath (ndd Medizintechnik AG, Zurich, Switzerland) and Spiroware (Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland) MBW-setups, respectively.<i>Approach.</i>We assessed mean relative differences in lung clearance index (LCI) and functional residual capacity (FRC) between the washin and washout of existing SF<sub>6</sub>-MBW data from healthy infants and infants with cystic fibrosis (CF). We assessed whether these differences exceeded the mean relative within-test between-trial differences of washout-derived outcomes, which can be attributed to natural variability. We also explored non-physiological factors using a pediatric lung simulator.<i>Main results.</i>LCI and FRC from washin and washout were not comparable, for both setups. The mean difference (SD) in LCI between washin and washout was 2.3(10.8)% for WBreath and -9.7(8.0)% for Spiroware, while in FRC it was -4.7(8.4)% for WBreath and -2.3(9.7)% for Spiroware. These differences exceeded the within-test between-trial differences in washout-derived outcomes. Outcomes from washin and washout were also not comparable in a pediatric lung simulator.<i>Significance.</i>Outcomes of the washin and washout were not comparable due to an interplay of physiological and non-physiological factors, and cannot be used interchangeably.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad8da4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad8da4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

六氟化硫(SF6)多次呼吸冲洗(MBW)可评估通气不均匀性,是阻塞性呼吸系统疾病的早期标志。主要结果通常由冲洗得出,目前还不清楚之前的 SF6 冲洗是否能提供类似的估计值。我们的目的是评估分别使用 WBreath(ndd Medizintechnik AG,瑞士苏黎世)和 Spiroware(Eco Medics AG,瑞士 Duernten)MBW 设置测量的婴儿 SF6-MBW 数据在冲洗和冲洗阶段的主要 SF6-MBW 结果的可比性。我们评估了健康婴儿和囊性纤维化婴儿(CF)现有 SF6-MBW 数据的洗入和洗出间肺清除指数(LCI)和功能残余容量(FRC)的平均相对差异。我们评估了这些差异是否超过了洗脱衍生结果的平均相对试验内差异,这可归因于自然变异。我们还使用儿科肺模拟器探讨了非生理因素。 主要结果:在两种设置下,洗入和洗出的LCI和FRC不具可比性。WBreath和Spiroware在洗入和洗出之间的LCI平均差异(SD)分别为2.3(10.8)%和-9.7(8.0)%,而在FRC方面,WBreath为-4.7(7.8)%,Spiroware为-2.3(9.7)%。这些差异超过了洗脱衍生结果的试验内差异。在小儿肺模拟器中,冲洗和冲出的结果也不具可比性。由于生理和非生理因素的相互作用,冲洗和冲出的结果不具可比性,不能互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sulfur hexafluoride multiple breath washin and washout outcomes in infants are not interchangeable.

Objective.Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) multiple-breath washout (MBW) assesses ventilation inhomogeneity, as an early marker of obstructive respiratory diseases. Primary outcomes are customarily washout-derived, and it is unclear whether the preceding SF6-washin can provide similar estimates. We aimed to assess comparability of primary SF6-MBW outcomes between washin and washout phases of infant SF6-MBW data measured with the WBreath (ndd Medizintechnik AG, Zurich, Switzerland) and Spiroware (Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland) MBW-setups, respectively.Approach.We assessed mean relative differences in lung clearance index (LCI) and functional residual capacity (FRC) between the washin and washout of existing SF6-MBW data from healthy infants and infants with cystic fibrosis (CF). We assessed whether these differences exceeded the mean relative within-test between-trial differences of washout-derived outcomes, which can be attributed to natural variability. We also explored non-physiological factors using a pediatric lung simulator.Main results.LCI and FRC from washin and washout were not comparable, for both setups. The mean difference (SD) in LCI between washin and washout was 2.3(10.8)% for WBreath and -9.7(8.0)% for Spiroware, while in FRC it was -4.7(8.4)% for WBreath and -2.3(9.7)% for Spiroware. These differences exceeded the within-test between-trial differences in washout-derived outcomes. Outcomes from washin and washout were also not comparable in a pediatric lung simulator.Significance.Outcomes of the washin and washout were not comparable due to an interplay of physiological and non-physiological factors, and cannot be used interchangeably.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Telephone training to improve ECG quality in remote screening for atrial fibrillation. Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches. Comparison of automatic and physiologically-based feature selection methods for classifying physiological stress using heart rate and pulse rate variability indices. Beat the heat: wearable-based study of perceived heat stress and physiological strain in Swiss track workers in a controlled climate chamber. A skewed-Gaussian model for pulse decomposition analysis of photoplethysmography signals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1