加拿大向急诊科求诊的体弱老年人转诊至跨专业服务的模式。

Amanda A Nova, George A Heckman, Navjot Gill-Chawla, Amy Miles, Andrew P Costa, Samir K Sinha, Micaela Jantzi, John P Hirdes, Paul C Hébert
{"title":"加拿大向急诊科求诊的体弱老年人转诊至跨专业服务的模式。","authors":"Amanda A Nova, George A Heckman, Navjot Gill-Chawla, Amy Miles, Andrew P Costa, Samir K Sinha, Micaela Jantzi, John P Hirdes, Paul C Hébert","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines recommend optimizing transitions of care for older patients with complex needs. In this study, we investigated referral patterns to interprofessional services, including occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietician, social work, home care, and specialized geriatric services, among older adults presenting to the ED with high-risk characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited community-dwelling older adults presenting to 10 EDs across Ontario, Quebec, and Newfoundland, Canada, from April 2017 to July 2018. To observe processes of care in the ED, we deployed a two-stage high-risk case-finding and focused comprehensive assessment process based on the interRAI ED-Screener and ED Contact Assessment to identify and characterize older adults at high risk. We analyzed the secondary data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 5265 individuals with the ED Screener, further assessed 1479 with the ED Contact Assessment, and analyzed data from a subset of 1055 community-dwelling older adults assessed with the ED Contact Assessment. Participants in our study sample had a mean age of 83 years, 58% were female, and many had a complex burden of cognitive and functional impairment and social needs. Over half of this high-needs sample were referred to general home care services (62.7%), occupational therapy (59.3%), and physiotherapy services (55.2%), while 16% were referred to specialized geriatric services. We also found a significant positive association between interprofessional referrals and the Assessment Urgency Algorithm and Institutional Risk Scale. The most important determinants of referral to interprofessional services were hospital province, functional, clinical, and social burden and support measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The referral patterns identified suggest that patient needs and risk intensity did not always guide referral patterns in the Canadian EDs investigated. We suggest that EDs critically examine the appropriateness of their documentation and referral systems for supporting person-centered care provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of referral to interprofessional services among frail older adults presenting to emergency departments in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda A Nova, George A Heckman, Navjot Gill-Chawla, Amy Miles, Andrew P Costa, Samir K Sinha, Micaela Jantzi, John P Hirdes, Paul C Hébert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines recommend optimizing transitions of care for older patients with complex needs. In this study, we investigated referral patterns to interprofessional services, including occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietician, social work, home care, and specialized geriatric services, among older adults presenting to the ED with high-risk characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited community-dwelling older adults presenting to 10 EDs across Ontario, Quebec, and Newfoundland, Canada, from April 2017 to July 2018. To observe processes of care in the ED, we deployed a two-stage high-risk case-finding and focused comprehensive assessment process based on the interRAI ED-Screener and ED Contact Assessment to identify and characterize older adults at high risk. We analyzed the secondary data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 5265 individuals with the ED Screener, further assessed 1479 with the ED Contact Assessment, and analyzed data from a subset of 1055 community-dwelling older adults assessed with the ED Contact Assessment. Participants in our study sample had a mean age of 83 years, 58% were female, and many had a complex burden of cognitive and functional impairment and social needs. Over half of this high-needs sample were referred to general home care services (62.7%), occupational therapy (59.3%), and physiotherapy services (55.2%), while 16% were referred to specialized geriatric services. We also found a significant positive association between interprofessional referrals and the Assessment Urgency Algorithm and Institutional Risk Scale. The most important determinants of referral to interprofessional services were hospital province, functional, clinical, and social burden and support measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The referral patterns identified suggest that patient needs and risk intensity did not always guide referral patterns in the Canadian EDs investigated. We suggest that EDs critically examine the appropriateness of their documentation and referral systems for supporting person-centered care provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年急诊科(ED)指南建议优化有复杂需求的老年患者的护理过渡。在这项研究中,我们调查了在急诊科就诊的具有高风险特征的老年人中,向跨专业服务机构(包括职业治疗、物理治疗、营养师、社会工作、家庭护理和专门的老年病学服务机构)转诊的模式:2017年4月至2018年7月,我们招募了前往加拿大安大略省、魁北克省和纽芬兰省10家急诊室就诊的社区居住老年人。为了观察急诊室的护理流程,我们采用了基于 interRAI 急诊室筛查器和急诊室接触评估的两阶段高风险病例查找和重点综合评估流程,以识别和描述高风险老年人。我们使用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析了二次数据:我们使用 ED 筛选器筛查了 5265 人,使用 ED 接触评估进一步评估了 1479 人,并分析了使用 ED 接触评估评估的 1055 名社区老年人的数据。我们研究样本中的参与者平均年龄为 83 岁,58% 为女性,许多人都有复杂的认知障碍、功能障碍和社会需求。在这些高需求样本中,超过一半的人被转介到普通家庭护理服务(62.7%)、职业治疗(59.3%)和物理治疗服务(55.2%),而 16% 的人被转介到专门的老年医学服务。我们还发现,跨专业转诊与 "评估紧急程度算法 "和 "机构风险量表 "之间存在明显的正相关。转诊到跨专业服务的最重要决定因素是医院省份、功能、临床和社会负担以及支持措施:所发现的转诊模式表明,在所调查的加拿大急诊室中,患者的需求和风险强度并不总是转诊模式的指导因素。我们建议急诊室严格审查其文件和转诊系统是否适合支持以人为本的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of referral to interprofessional services among frail older adults presenting to emergency departments in Canada.

Background: Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines recommend optimizing transitions of care for older patients with complex needs. In this study, we investigated referral patterns to interprofessional services, including occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietician, social work, home care, and specialized geriatric services, among older adults presenting to the ED with high-risk characteristics.

Methods: We recruited community-dwelling older adults presenting to 10 EDs across Ontario, Quebec, and Newfoundland, Canada, from April 2017 to July 2018. To observe processes of care in the ED, we deployed a two-stage high-risk case-finding and focused comprehensive assessment process based on the interRAI ED-Screener and ED Contact Assessment to identify and characterize older adults at high risk. We analyzed the secondary data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Results: We screened 5265 individuals with the ED Screener, further assessed 1479 with the ED Contact Assessment, and analyzed data from a subset of 1055 community-dwelling older adults assessed with the ED Contact Assessment. Participants in our study sample had a mean age of 83 years, 58% were female, and many had a complex burden of cognitive and functional impairment and social needs. Over half of this high-needs sample were referred to general home care services (62.7%), occupational therapy (59.3%), and physiotherapy services (55.2%), while 16% were referred to specialized geriatric services. We also found a significant positive association between interprofessional referrals and the Assessment Urgency Algorithm and Institutional Risk Scale. The most important determinants of referral to interprofessional services were hospital province, functional, clinical, and social burden and support measures.

Conclusions: The referral patterns identified suggest that patient needs and risk intensity did not always guide referral patterns in the Canadian EDs investigated. We suggest that EDs critically examine the appropriateness of their documentation and referral systems for supporting person-centered care provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The art of aging gracefully. Factors associated with language concordant cognitive testing among linguistically diverse older adults. Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial. Change in frailty among older COVID-19 survivors. Stress tests and biomarkers of resilience: Proceedings of the second state of resilience science conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1