{"title":"多细胞肿瘤球:癌症转化研究的便捷体外模型","authors":"Tushar Patel , Neeraj Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the attempts to mitigate uncertainties in the results of monolayer culture for the identification of cancer therapeutic targets and compounds, there has been a growing interest in using 3D cancer spheroid models, which include tumorospheres (TSs), tissue-derived tumor spheres (TDTSs), organotypic multicellular tumor spheroids (OMSs), and multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTSs). The MCTSs, either Mono-MCTSs or Hetero-MCTSs, with or without scaffold, in particular, offer numerous advantages over other spheroid models, including easy cultivation, high reproducibility, accessibility, high throughput, controllable size, well-rounded shape, simplicity of genetic manipulation, economical and availability of various biological methods for their development. In this review, we have attempted to discuss the role of MCTSs concerning various aspects of translational cancer research, such as drug response and penetration, cell-cell interaction, and invasion and metastasis. However, the Mono-MCTSs, either scaffold-free or scaffold-based, may not adequately represent the cellular heterogeneity and complexity of clinical tumors, limiting their utility in translational cancer research. Conversely, Hetero-MCTS models, both scaffold-free and scaffold-based, show better suitability due to the presence of a similar in vivo type tumor microenvironment. Nonetheless, scaffold-based Hetero-MCTS models show batch variability and challenges in performing quantitative assays due to difficulties extracting spheroids and cells from scaffolds. Further, incorporating stromal cells with cancer cells in a more precise ratio to develop Hetero-MCTSs can enhance the model's relevance, yielding more clinically reliable outcomes for drug candidates and improving insights into tumor biology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18122,"journal":{"name":"Life sciences","volume":"358 ","pages":"Article 123184"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicellular tumor spheroids: A convenient in vitro model for translational cancer research\",\"authors\":\"Tushar Patel , Neeraj Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the attempts to mitigate uncertainties in the results of monolayer culture for the identification of cancer therapeutic targets and compounds, there has been a growing interest in using 3D cancer spheroid models, which include tumorospheres (TSs), tissue-derived tumor spheres (TDTSs), organotypic multicellular tumor spheroids (OMSs), and multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTSs). The MCTSs, either Mono-MCTSs or Hetero-MCTSs, with or without scaffold, in particular, offer numerous advantages over other spheroid models, including easy cultivation, high reproducibility, accessibility, high throughput, controllable size, well-rounded shape, simplicity of genetic manipulation, economical and availability of various biological methods for their development. In this review, we have attempted to discuss the role of MCTSs concerning various aspects of translational cancer research, such as drug response and penetration, cell-cell interaction, and invasion and metastasis. However, the Mono-MCTSs, either scaffold-free or scaffold-based, may not adequately represent the cellular heterogeneity and complexity of clinical tumors, limiting their utility in translational cancer research. Conversely, Hetero-MCTS models, both scaffold-free and scaffold-based, show better suitability due to the presence of a similar in vivo type tumor microenvironment. Nonetheless, scaffold-based Hetero-MCTS models show batch variability and challenges in performing quantitative assays due to difficulties extracting spheroids and cells from scaffolds. Further, incorporating stromal cells with cancer cells in a more precise ratio to develop Hetero-MCTSs can enhance the model's relevance, yielding more clinically reliable outcomes for drug candidates and improving insights into tumor biology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life sciences\",\"volume\":\"358 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024320524007744\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024320524007744","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multicellular tumor spheroids: A convenient in vitro model for translational cancer research
In the attempts to mitigate uncertainties in the results of monolayer culture for the identification of cancer therapeutic targets and compounds, there has been a growing interest in using 3D cancer spheroid models, which include tumorospheres (TSs), tissue-derived tumor spheres (TDTSs), organotypic multicellular tumor spheroids (OMSs), and multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTSs). The MCTSs, either Mono-MCTSs or Hetero-MCTSs, with or without scaffold, in particular, offer numerous advantages over other spheroid models, including easy cultivation, high reproducibility, accessibility, high throughput, controllable size, well-rounded shape, simplicity of genetic manipulation, economical and availability of various biological methods for their development. In this review, we have attempted to discuss the role of MCTSs concerning various aspects of translational cancer research, such as drug response and penetration, cell-cell interaction, and invasion and metastasis. However, the Mono-MCTSs, either scaffold-free or scaffold-based, may not adequately represent the cellular heterogeneity and complexity of clinical tumors, limiting their utility in translational cancer research. Conversely, Hetero-MCTS models, both scaffold-free and scaffold-based, show better suitability due to the presence of a similar in vivo type tumor microenvironment. Nonetheless, scaffold-based Hetero-MCTS models show batch variability and challenges in performing quantitative assays due to difficulties extracting spheroids and cells from scaffolds. Further, incorporating stromal cells with cancer cells in a more precise ratio to develop Hetero-MCTSs can enhance the model's relevance, yielding more clinically reliable outcomes for drug candidates and improving insights into tumor biology.
期刊介绍:
Life Sciences is an international journal publishing articles that emphasize the molecular, cellular, and functional basis of therapy. The journal emphasizes the understanding of mechanism that is relevant to all aspects of human disease and translation to patients. All articles are rigorously reviewed.
The Journal favors publication of full-length papers where modern scientific technologies are used to explain molecular, cellular and physiological mechanisms. Articles that merely report observations are rarely accepted. Recommendations from the Declaration of Helsinki or NIH guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals must be adhered to. Articles should be written at a level accessible to readers who are non-specialists in the topic of the article themselves, but who are interested in the research. The Journal welcomes reviews on topics of wide interest to investigators in the life sciences. We particularly encourage submission of brief, focused reviews containing high-quality artwork and require the use of mechanistic summary diagrams.