本科生研究研讨会:本科生研究之旅的重要组成部分

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102969
{"title":"本科生研究研讨会:本科生研究之旅的重要组成部分","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focused on social science undergraduate students' (a) perceptions of their research self-efficacy after participating in an undergraduate research symposium (URS) and (b) which research experiences were significant or meaningful and why. An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was used (2022−2023) with <em>N</em> = 91 Saudi female students completing a researcher-designed research self-efficacy e-survey (26 item, 5-point Likert agree/disagree scale): an experimental group (<em>n</em> = 50) that attended an URS and a control group (<em>n</em> = 41) that did not. This was followed by semi-structured interviews (<em>n</em> = 11) of experimental group participants. The experimental group exhibited significantly higher research self-efficacy overall (t-value = 7.731; <em>p</em>-value = .001) and across three aspects of research: planning, implementation, and presentation (average mean = 4.50). The URS was highly effective for social science students. A follow-up thematic analysis (&gt;90 % intercoder reliability) yielded five themes further affirming the success of the URS in improving research self-efficacy: women's empowerment, self-regulated learning especially via library access, career resilience, a respect for inherent challenges, and transformed perceptions of research. Because of the URS experience, students gained confidence and belief in their ability to effectively undertake research-related tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate research symposium: Vital component in undergraduates' research journey\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study focused on social science undergraduate students' (a) perceptions of their research self-efficacy after participating in an undergraduate research symposium (URS) and (b) which research experiences were significant or meaningful and why. An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was used (2022−2023) with <em>N</em> = 91 Saudi female students completing a researcher-designed research self-efficacy e-survey (26 item, 5-point Likert agree/disagree scale): an experimental group (<em>n</em> = 50) that attended an URS and a control group (<em>n</em> = 41) that did not. This was followed by semi-structured interviews (<em>n</em> = 11) of experimental group participants. The experimental group exhibited significantly higher research self-efficacy overall (t-value = 7.731; <em>p</em>-value = .001) and across three aspects of research: planning, implementation, and presentation (average mean = 4.50). The URS was highly effective for social science students. A follow-up thematic analysis (&gt;90 % intercoder reliability) yielded five themes further affirming the success of the URS in improving research self-efficacy: women's empowerment, self-regulated learning especially via library access, career resilience, a respect for inherent challenges, and transformed perceptions of research. Because of the URS experience, students gained confidence and belief in their ability to effectively undertake research-related tasks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324001307\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324001307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究重点关注社会科学专业本科生(a)参加本科生研究讨论会(URS)后对其研究自我效能的看法,以及(b)哪些研究经历是重要或有意义的,为什么。我们采用了一种解释性顺序混合方法设计(2022-2023 年),让 N = 91 名沙特女学生完成研究人员设计的研究自我效能电子调查(26 个项目,5 点 Likert 同意/不同意量表):实验组(n = 50)参加了 URS,对照组(n = 41)没有参加。随后,对实验组参与者进行了半结构化访谈(n = 11)。实验组在总体上(t 值 = 7.731; p 值 = .001)和研究的三个方面:计划、实施和展示(平均值 = 4.50)表现出明显更高的研究自我效能感。URS 对社会科学专业的学生非常有效。后续的主题分析(代码间可靠性为 90%)得出了五个主题,进一步肯定了 URS 在提高研究自我效能方面取得的成功:女性赋权、自我调节学习(尤其是通过访问图书馆)、职业适应力、尊重固有挑战以及研究观念的转变。由于 URS 的经验,学生们增强了信心,相信自己有能力有效地完成与研究有关的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Undergraduate research symposium: Vital component in undergraduates' research journey
This study focused on social science undergraduate students' (a) perceptions of their research self-efficacy after participating in an undergraduate research symposium (URS) and (b) which research experiences were significant or meaningful and why. An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was used (2022−2023) with N = 91 Saudi female students completing a researcher-designed research self-efficacy e-survey (26 item, 5-point Likert agree/disagree scale): an experimental group (n = 50) that attended an URS and a control group (n = 41) that did not. This was followed by semi-structured interviews (n = 11) of experimental group participants. The experimental group exhibited significantly higher research self-efficacy overall (t-value = 7.731; p-value = .001) and across three aspects of research: planning, implementation, and presentation (average mean = 4.50). The URS was highly effective for social science students. A follow-up thematic analysis (>90 % intercoder reliability) yielded five themes further affirming the success of the URS in improving research self-efficacy: women's empowerment, self-regulated learning especially via library access, career resilience, a respect for inherent challenges, and transformed perceptions of research. Because of the URS experience, students gained confidence and belief in their ability to effectively undertake research-related tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Promoting citizen science through academic libraries in the US: A study on LibGuides Undergraduate research symposium: Vital component in undergraduates' research journey Artificial intelligence implementation strategies for Ghanaian academic libraries: A scoping review Disability policies to guide the provision of facilities, services and resources to students with disabilities: The case of ten Ghanaian academic libraries Environmental scan of equity, diversity, and inclusion practices in collection development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1