Vincent Puy, Badria Bennani Smires, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Julie Barberet, Marion Bendayan, Oxana Blagosklonov, Florence Brugnon, Rosalie Cabry-Goubet, Marie-Ange Clarotti, Sophie Catteau-Jonard, Céline Chalas, Lucie Chansel-Debordeaux, Béatrice Delepine, Laetitia Hesters, Stéphanie Lattès, Floriane Lefeuve, Arthur Luton, Catherine Metzler-Guillemain, Sophie Mirallié, Joffrey Mons, Valerica-Gabriela Oancea, Nathalie Rives, Nathalie Sermondade, Anna Tournier, Catherine Vincent-Delorme, Gérard Tachdjian, Eva Pipiras, Florence Eustache
{"title":"卵细胞捐献者染色体异常:法国对 8200 多例核型的调查。","authors":"Vincent Puy, Badria Bennani Smires, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Julie Barberet, Marion Bendayan, Oxana Blagosklonov, Florence Brugnon, Rosalie Cabry-Goubet, Marie-Ange Clarotti, Sophie Catteau-Jonard, Céline Chalas, Lucie Chansel-Debordeaux, Béatrice Delepine, Laetitia Hesters, Stéphanie Lattès, Floriane Lefeuve, Arthur Luton, Catherine Metzler-Guillemain, Sophie Mirallié, Joffrey Mons, Valerica-Gabriela Oancea, Nathalie Rives, Nathalie Sermondade, Anna Tournier, Catherine Vincent-Delorme, Gérard Tachdjian, Eva Pipiras, Florence Eustache","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study karyotypes of more than 8,200 oocyte donor candidates in nulliparous or multiparous women compared to a reference population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational multicentric study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The study included two cohorts of oocyte donor candidates recruited between January 2005 and October 2021: multiparous women with at least one child at the time of recruitment, and nulliparous women. Both were compared to a reference population composed of female newborns from literature.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Blood lymphocyte karyotype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8229 oocyte donor candidates from 22 fertility centers were included in this study. Nulliparous women (n=1890) and multiparous ones (n=6339) were compared to 8102 female newborns. Overall, 65 candidates were carriers of chromosomal abnormalities and were therefore excluded from the donation process (0.79%, 95% CI: 0.60-0.98). The occurrence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements was globally increased in the study population (0.49%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64) compared to female newborns (0.24%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64, p=0.0086). The number of reciprocal translocations was increased 5-fold in nulliparous oocyte donor candidates (0.37%, 95% CI: 0.10-0.64, p=0.013). The incidence of sex chromosome mosaicism was notably increased in multiparous oocyte donor candidates, with 17 cases (0.27%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.40, p=0.0052). Among chromosomal aberration carriers only two nulliparous women (one reciprocal translocation and one sex chromosome mosaicism) had fertility issues with a diagnosis of premature ovarian failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this comprehensive 16-years French experience of karyotyping in oocyte donor candidates, we confirmed an increased incidence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements, especially among those without children at the time of recruitment. Karyotyping could be considered to identify any chromosomal abnormalities that may not be easily detectable through medical questioning. These abnormalities pose an inherent genetic risk for gamete recipients if left undetected.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chromosomal abnormalities in oocyte donor candidates: a French survey of over 8200 karyotypes.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Puy, Badria Bennani Smires, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Julie Barberet, Marion Bendayan, Oxana Blagosklonov, Florence Brugnon, Rosalie Cabry-Goubet, Marie-Ange Clarotti, Sophie Catteau-Jonard, Céline Chalas, Lucie Chansel-Debordeaux, Béatrice Delepine, Laetitia Hesters, Stéphanie Lattès, Floriane Lefeuve, Arthur Luton, Catherine Metzler-Guillemain, Sophie Mirallié, Joffrey Mons, Valerica-Gabriela Oancea, Nathalie Rives, Nathalie Sermondade, Anna Tournier, Catherine Vincent-Delorme, Gérard Tachdjian, Eva Pipiras, Florence Eustache\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study karyotypes of more than 8,200 oocyte donor candidates in nulliparous or multiparous women compared to a reference population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational multicentric study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The study included two cohorts of oocyte donor candidates recruited between January 2005 and October 2021: multiparous women with at least one child at the time of recruitment, and nulliparous women. Both were compared to a reference population composed of female newborns from literature.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Blood lymphocyte karyotype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8229 oocyte donor candidates from 22 fertility centers were included in this study. Nulliparous women (n=1890) and multiparous ones (n=6339) were compared to 8102 female newborns. Overall, 65 candidates were carriers of chromosomal abnormalities and were therefore excluded from the donation process (0.79%, 95% CI: 0.60-0.98). The occurrence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements was globally increased in the study population (0.49%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64) compared to female newborns (0.24%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64, p=0.0086). The number of reciprocal translocations was increased 5-fold in nulliparous oocyte donor candidates (0.37%, 95% CI: 0.10-0.64, p=0.013). The incidence of sex chromosome mosaicism was notably increased in multiparous oocyte donor candidates, with 17 cases (0.27%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.40, p=0.0052). Among chromosomal aberration carriers only two nulliparous women (one reciprocal translocation and one sex chromosome mosaicism) had fertility issues with a diagnosis of premature ovarian failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this comprehensive 16-years French experience of karyotyping in oocyte donor candidates, we confirmed an increased incidence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements, especially among those without children at the time of recruitment. Karyotyping could be considered to identify any chromosomal abnormalities that may not be easily detectable through medical questioning. These abnormalities pose an inherent genetic risk for gamete recipients if left undetected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.037\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chromosomal abnormalities in oocyte donor candidates: a French survey of over 8200 karyotypes.
Objective: To study karyotypes of more than 8,200 oocyte donor candidates in nulliparous or multiparous women compared to a reference population.
Design: A retrospective observational multicentric study.
Subjects: The study included two cohorts of oocyte donor candidates recruited between January 2005 and October 2021: multiparous women with at least one child at the time of recruitment, and nulliparous women. Both were compared to a reference population composed of female newborns from literature.
Exposure: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: Blood lymphocyte karyotype.
Results: A total of 8229 oocyte donor candidates from 22 fertility centers were included in this study. Nulliparous women (n=1890) and multiparous ones (n=6339) were compared to 8102 female newborns. Overall, 65 candidates were carriers of chromosomal abnormalities and were therefore excluded from the donation process (0.79%, 95% CI: 0.60-0.98). The occurrence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements was globally increased in the study population (0.49%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64) compared to female newborns (0.24%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64, p=0.0086). The number of reciprocal translocations was increased 5-fold in nulliparous oocyte donor candidates (0.37%, 95% CI: 0.10-0.64, p=0.013). The incidence of sex chromosome mosaicism was notably increased in multiparous oocyte donor candidates, with 17 cases (0.27%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.40, p=0.0052). Among chromosomal aberration carriers only two nulliparous women (one reciprocal translocation and one sex chromosome mosaicism) had fertility issues with a diagnosis of premature ovarian failure.
Conclusion: In this comprehensive 16-years French experience of karyotyping in oocyte donor candidates, we confirmed an increased incidence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements, especially among those without children at the time of recruitment. Karyotyping could be considered to identify any chromosomal abnormalities that may not be easily detectable through medical questioning. These abnormalities pose an inherent genetic risk for gamete recipients if left undetected.
期刊介绍:
Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.