在一个有全面不孕不育规定的州,按种族和民族分列的不孕不育服务使用情况的决定因素。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036
Ann Korkidakis, Veronica Wang, Riwa Sabbagh, Quetrell Heyward, Michele R Hacker, Kim L Thornton, Alan S Penzias
{"title":"在一个有全面不孕不育规定的州,按种族和民族分列的不孕不育服务使用情况的决定因素。","authors":"Ann Korkidakis, Veronica Wang, Riwa Sabbagh, Quetrell Heyward, Michele R Hacker, Kim L Thornton, Alan S Penzias","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between sociodemographic factors and utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic-affiliated fertility center.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Women presenting for initial infertility evaluation from January 2010-December 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Initial infertility evaluation and treatment utilization.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The prevalence of reproductive-aged women who reside in Massachusetts presenting for initial consult versus census-based estimates was calculated for each racial and ethnic group. Age at initial consult, insurance coverage, drive time to nearest affiliated center, and neighborhood deprivation as measured by Area Deprivation Index, were considered determinants of treatment utilization in regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>A total of 16,160 women presenting for an infertility consult from 2010-2021 met inclusion criteria. Compared to census estimates, Non-Hispanic (NH) Asian and NH White individuals were overrepresented in initial consults, whereas the NH Black and Hispanic populations were underrepresented throughout the study period. Mean age at presentation was higher in NH Black women compared to the NH Asian reference group (35.7 ± 5.1 vs 34.6 ± 4.4 years old). A lower proportion of Hispanic and NH Black women had private insurance (78% and 79%, respectively) compared to 86% of NH Asian women. Over a fifth of Hispanic and NH Black women lived in the most disadvantaged ADI quintile (23 and 21%, respectively) compared to 6% of the reference population. Overall, the absence of private insurance, greater neighborhood disadvantage, and increased driving distance were associated with lower treatment utilization (OR 0.79, [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.87], for other vs. private insurance; OR 0.62, [0.53-0.72], for ADI quintile 5 vs. 1, OR 0.84 [0.72-0.97] for drive time 15-30 vs. <15 minutes), whereas age was not (OR 0.96 [0.93-1.00] for each 5-year increase).</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Relative to their numbers in the broader population of reproductive-aged women in Massachusetts, the NH Black and Hispanic populations were the most underrepresented racial and ethnic groups seen for infertility evaluation at our center. These individuals were less likely to have private insurance coverage and more likely to live in disadvantaged neighborhoods, which are variables that negatively impact infertility treatment utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Korkidakis, Veronica Wang, Riwa Sabbagh, Quetrell Heyward, Michele R Hacker, Kim L Thornton, Alan S Penzias\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between sociodemographic factors and utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic-affiliated fertility center.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Women presenting for initial infertility evaluation from January 2010-December 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Initial infertility evaluation and treatment utilization.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The prevalence of reproductive-aged women who reside in Massachusetts presenting for initial consult versus census-based estimates was calculated for each racial and ethnic group. Age at initial consult, insurance coverage, drive time to nearest affiliated center, and neighborhood deprivation as measured by Area Deprivation Index, were considered determinants of treatment utilization in regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>A total of 16,160 women presenting for an infertility consult from 2010-2021 met inclusion criteria. Compared to census estimates, Non-Hispanic (NH) Asian and NH White individuals were overrepresented in initial consults, whereas the NH Black and Hispanic populations were underrepresented throughout the study period. Mean age at presentation was higher in NH Black women compared to the NH Asian reference group (35.7 ± 5.1 vs 34.6 ± 4.4 years old). A lower proportion of Hispanic and NH Black women had private insurance (78% and 79%, respectively) compared to 86% of NH Asian women. Over a fifth of Hispanic and NH Black women lived in the most disadvantaged ADI quintile (23 and 21%, respectively) compared to 6% of the reference population. Overall, the absence of private insurance, greater neighborhood disadvantage, and increased driving distance were associated with lower treatment utilization (OR 0.79, [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.87], for other vs. private insurance; OR 0.62, [0.53-0.72], for ADI quintile 5 vs. 1, OR 0.84 [0.72-0.97] for drive time 15-30 vs. <15 minutes), whereas age was not (OR 0.96 [0.93-1.00] for each 5-year increase).</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Relative to their numbers in the broader population of reproductive-aged women in Massachusetts, the NH Black and Hispanic populations were the most underrepresented racial and ethnic groups seen for infertility evaluation at our center. These individuals were less likely to have private insurance coverage and more likely to live in disadvantaged neighborhoods, which are variables that negatively impact infertility treatment utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在一个有全面不孕不育规定的州,按种族和民族研究社会人口因素与不孕不育服务利用率之间的关系:设计:回顾性队列:学术附属生殖中心:暴露:初始不孕不育评估和治疗利用情况:主要结果测量指标:计算居住在马萨诸塞州的育龄妇女初次就诊率与基于人口普查的估计值之间的差异。在回归分析中,初次就诊时的年龄、保险覆盖率、到最近附属中心的车程以及以地区贫困指数衡量的邻里贫困程度被认为是治疗利用率的决定因素:2010年至2021年期间,共有16160名妇女接受了不孕症咨询,符合纳入标准。与人口普查估计值相比,非西班牙裔(NH)亚裔和NH白人在初次咨询中的比例偏高,而NH黑人和西班牙裔在整个研究期间的比例偏低。与新罕布什尔亚裔参照组相比,新罕布什尔黑人妇女的平均就诊年龄更高(35.7 ± 5.1 岁 vs 34.6 ± 4.4 岁)。与 86% 的新罕布什尔亚裔妇女相比,西班牙裔和新罕布什尔黑人妇女拥有私人保险的比例较低(分别为 78% 和 79%)。超过五分之一的西班牙裔和新罕布什尔州黑人妇女生活在最贫困的 ADI 五分之一人口中(分别为 23% 和 21%),而参照人口的这一比例仅为 6%。总体而言,没有私人保险、邻里关系较差以及驾车距离较远与治疗利用率较低有关(其他保险与私人保险的 OR 值为 0.79 [95%置信区间为 0.71-0.87];ADI 五分位数 5 与 1 的 OR 值为 0.62 [0.53-0.72];驾车时间 15-30 与结论的 OR 值为 0.84 [0.72-0.97]):与马萨诸塞州广大育龄妇女的人数相比,新罕布什尔州的黑人和西班牙裔是本中心接受不孕症评估的人数最少的种族和民族群体。这些人拥有私人保险的可能性较低,更有可能生活在贫困社区,而这些因素都会对不孕症治疗的利用率产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.

Objective: To examine the association between sociodemographic factors and utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Academic-affiliated fertility center.

Subjects: Women presenting for initial infertility evaluation from January 2010-December 2021.

Exposure: Initial infertility evaluation and treatment utilization.

Main outcome measure(s): The prevalence of reproductive-aged women who reside in Massachusetts presenting for initial consult versus census-based estimates was calculated for each racial and ethnic group. Age at initial consult, insurance coverage, drive time to nearest affiliated center, and neighborhood deprivation as measured by Area Deprivation Index, were considered determinants of treatment utilization in regression analysis.

Result(s): A total of 16,160 women presenting for an infertility consult from 2010-2021 met inclusion criteria. Compared to census estimates, Non-Hispanic (NH) Asian and NH White individuals were overrepresented in initial consults, whereas the NH Black and Hispanic populations were underrepresented throughout the study period. Mean age at presentation was higher in NH Black women compared to the NH Asian reference group (35.7 ± 5.1 vs 34.6 ± 4.4 years old). A lower proportion of Hispanic and NH Black women had private insurance (78% and 79%, respectively) compared to 86% of NH Asian women. Over a fifth of Hispanic and NH Black women lived in the most disadvantaged ADI quintile (23 and 21%, respectively) compared to 6% of the reference population. Overall, the absence of private insurance, greater neighborhood disadvantage, and increased driving distance were associated with lower treatment utilization (OR 0.79, [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.87], for other vs. private insurance; OR 0.62, [0.53-0.72], for ADI quintile 5 vs. 1, OR 0.84 [0.72-0.97] for drive time 15-30 vs. <15 minutes), whereas age was not (OR 0.96 [0.93-1.00] for each 5-year increase).

Conclusion(s): Relative to their numbers in the broader population of reproductive-aged women in Massachusetts, the NH Black and Hispanic populations were the most underrepresented racial and ethnic groups seen for infertility evaluation at our center. These individuals were less likely to have private insurance coverage and more likely to live in disadvantaged neighborhoods, which are variables that negatively impact infertility treatment utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Human embryos with segmental aneuploidies display delayed early development: a multi-centre morphokinetic analysis. Pharmacological and Surgical Strategies to Improve Cryopreserved Ovarian Tissue Transplantation Longevity and Outcomes. Editorial Board Table of Contents When should assisted reproductive technology workups be performed: following a tiered approach or all on day 1?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1