视盘色素沉着与小巩膜管的关系--系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0
Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert
{"title":"视盘色素沉着与小巩膜管的关系--系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert","doi":"10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (PO<sub>b</sub>) and patients with visible ODD (PO<sub>v</sub>). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (D<sub>F</sub>) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (D<sub>O-EDI</sub>) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). D<sub>O-EDI</sub>, but not D<sub>F</sub>, was higher in PO<sub>v</sub> as compared to PO<sub>b</sub>. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between PO<sub>v</sub> and PO<sub>b</sub>, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of optic disc drusen and small scleral canals - A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (PO<sub>b</sub>) and patients with visible ODD (PO<sub>v</sub>). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (D<sub>F</sub>) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (D<sub>O-EDI</sub>) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). D<sub>O-EDI</sub>, but not D<sub>F</sub>, was higher in PO<sub>v</sub> as compared to PO<sub>b</sub>. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between PO<sub>v</sub> and PO<sub>b</sub>, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,人们一直在讨论视盘色素(ODD)的病理生理学。一种主要的理论认为,视盘色素是由轴突受异常狭小的巩膜管挤压而挤出的钙化线粒体形成的。为了验证这一假设,我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,评估了 ODD 患者(PO)与健康受试者(HS)的巩膜管大小对比。我们检索了 MEDLINE、Cochrane Central、EMBASE 和灰色文献,以确定相关文章。亚组分析比较了埋藏型 ODD 患者(POb)和可见型 ODD 患者(POv)。该研究于2022年12月9日在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心注册(注册号:CRD42022375110)。我们在综述中纳入了 15 篇文章,在荟萃分析中纳入了 14 篇文章。使用眼底照相(DF)和光谱域增强深度成像光学相干断层扫描(DO-EDI)计算出的巩膜管平均直径,PO明显小于HS(标准化平均差分别为-1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56]和-0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37])。与 POb 相比,POv 的 DO-EDI 更高,但 DF 不高。如果将所有世代的 OCT 都纳入分析,POv 和 POb 之间的差异依然存在,但 PO 和 HS 之间的差异则不存在。有几种相互交织的假说可以解释这些亚组和敏感性结果:随着 ODD 的增长,管腔扩大;随着时间的推移,管腔扩大;或测量偏差(由于 OCT 上的后部阴影,管腔被人为扩大)。总之,本综述和荟萃分析进一步证实了小巩膜管在 ODD 发展过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of optic disc drusen and small scleral canals - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (POb) and patients with visible ODD (POv). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (DF) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (DO-EDI) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). DO-EDI, but not DF, was higher in POv as compared to POb. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between POv and POb, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
期刊最新文献
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 19, a comparative study of the cost and carbon footprint of local anaesthesia techniques for cataract surgery. A case-control study of peripapillary microvascular structure by OCT-angiography in non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy at early and resolutive stages. Gene therapy for geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: current insights. Photoreceptor assessment in age-related macular degeneration. Severe keratomalacia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1