Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert
{"title":"视盘色素沉着与小巩膜管的关系--系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert","doi":"10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (PO<sub>b</sub>) and patients with visible ODD (PO<sub>v</sub>). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (D<sub>F</sub>) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (D<sub>O-EDI</sub>) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). D<sub>O-EDI</sub>, but not D<sub>F</sub>, was higher in PO<sub>v</sub> as compared to PO<sub>b</sub>. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between PO<sub>v</sub> and PO<sub>b</sub>, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of optic disc drusen and small scleral canals - A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (PO<sub>b</sub>) and patients with visible ODD (PO<sub>v</sub>). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (D<sub>F</sub>) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (D<sub>O-EDI</sub>) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). D<sub>O-EDI</sub>, but not D<sub>F</sub>, was higher in PO<sub>v</sub> as compared to PO<sub>b</sub>. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between PO<sub>v</sub> and PO<sub>b</sub>, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期以来,人们一直在讨论视盘色素(ODD)的病理生理学。一种主要的理论认为,视盘色素是由轴突受异常狭小的巩膜管挤压而挤出的钙化线粒体形成的。为了验证这一假设,我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,评估了 ODD 患者(PO)与健康受试者(HS)的巩膜管大小对比。我们检索了 MEDLINE、Cochrane Central、EMBASE 和灰色文献,以确定相关文章。亚组分析比较了埋藏型 ODD 患者(POb)和可见型 ODD 患者(POv)。该研究于2022年12月9日在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心注册(注册号:CRD42022375110)。我们在综述中纳入了 15 篇文章,在荟萃分析中纳入了 14 篇文章。使用眼底照相(DF)和光谱域增强深度成像光学相干断层扫描(DO-EDI)计算出的巩膜管平均直径,PO明显小于HS(标准化平均差分别为-1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56]和-0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37])。与 POb 相比,POv 的 DO-EDI 更高,但 DF 不高。如果将所有世代的 OCT 都纳入分析,POv 和 POb 之间的差异依然存在,但 PO 和 HS 之间的差异则不存在。有几种相互交织的假说可以解释这些亚组和敏感性结果:随着 ODD 的增长,管腔扩大;随着时间的推移,管腔扩大;或测量偏差(由于 OCT 上的后部阴影,管腔被人为扩大)。总之,本综述和荟萃分析进一步证实了小巩膜管在 ODD 发展过程中的作用。
Association of optic disc drusen and small scleral canals - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (POb) and patients with visible ODD (POv). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (DF) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (DO-EDI) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). DO-EDI, but not DF, was higher in POv as compared to POb. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between POv and POb, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.
期刊介绍:
Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.