Christine V. Chung , Meena S. Khan , Adenike Olanrewaju , Mary Pham , Quyen T. Nguyen , Tina Patel , Prajnan Das , Michael S. O’Reilly , Valerie K. Reed , Anuja Jhingran , Hannah Simonds , Ethan B. Ludmir , Karen E. Hoffman , Komeela Naidoo , Jeannette Parkes , Ajay Aggarwal , Lauren L. Mayo , Shalin J. Shah , Chad Tang , Beth M. Beadle , Laurence E. Court
{"title":"基于知识的规划,对 10 个不同癌症部位进行全自动放射治疗规划。","authors":"Christine V. Chung , Meena S. Khan , Adenike Olanrewaju , Mary Pham , Quyen T. Nguyen , Tina Patel , Prajnan Das , Michael S. O’Reilly , Valerie K. Reed , Anuja Jhingran , Hannah Simonds , Ethan B. Ludmir , Karen E. Hoffman , Komeela Naidoo , Jeannette Parkes , Ajay Aggarwal , Lauren L. Mayo , Shalin J. Shah , Chad Tang , Beth M. Beadle , Laurence E. Court","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Radiation treatment planning is highly complex and can have significant inter- and intra-planner inconsistency, as well as variability in planning time and plan quality. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a tool that can be used to efficiently produce high-quality, consistent, clinically acceptable plans, independent of planner skills and experience. In this study, we created and validated multiple clinically acceptable and fully automatable KBP models, with the goal of creating VMAT plans without user intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten KBP models were configured using high quality clinical plans from a single institution. They were then honed to be part of a fully automatable system by incorporating scriptable planning structures, plan creation, and plan optimization. These models were verified and validated using quantitative (model statistics) and qualitative (dose-volume histogram estimation review) analysis. The resulting KBP-generated plans were reviewed by physicians and rated for clinical acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Autoplanning models were created for anorectal, bladder, breast/chest wall, cervix, esophagus, head and neck, liver, lung/mediastinum, prostate, and prostate with nodes treatment sites. All models were successfully created to be part of a fully automated system without the need for human intervention to create a fully optimized plan. The physician review indicated that, on average, 88% of all KBP-generated plans were “acceptable as is” and 98% were “acceptable after minor edits.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>KBP models for multiple treatment sites were used as a basis to generate fully automatable, efficient, consistent, high-quality, and clinically acceptable plans. These plans do not require human intervention, demonstrating the potential this work has to significantly impact treatment planning workflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge-based planning for fully automated radiation therapy treatment planning of 10 different cancer sites\",\"authors\":\"Christine V. Chung , Meena S. Khan , Adenike Olanrewaju , Mary Pham , Quyen T. Nguyen , Tina Patel , Prajnan Das , Michael S. O’Reilly , Valerie K. Reed , Anuja Jhingran , Hannah Simonds , Ethan B. Ludmir , Karen E. Hoffman , Komeela Naidoo , Jeannette Parkes , Ajay Aggarwal , Lauren L. Mayo , Shalin J. Shah , Chad Tang , Beth M. Beadle , Laurence E. Court\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Radiation treatment planning is highly complex and can have significant inter- and intra-planner inconsistency, as well as variability in planning time and plan quality. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a tool that can be used to efficiently produce high-quality, consistent, clinically acceptable plans, independent of planner skills and experience. In this study, we created and validated multiple clinically acceptable and fully automatable KBP models, with the goal of creating VMAT plans without user intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten KBP models were configured using high quality clinical plans from a single institution. They were then honed to be part of a fully automatable system by incorporating scriptable planning structures, plan creation, and plan optimization. These models were verified and validated using quantitative (model statistics) and qualitative (dose-volume histogram estimation review) analysis. The resulting KBP-generated plans were reviewed by physicians and rated for clinical acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Autoplanning models were created for anorectal, bladder, breast/chest wall, cervix, esophagus, head and neck, liver, lung/mediastinum, prostate, and prostate with nodes treatment sites. All models were successfully created to be part of a fully automated system without the need for human intervention to create a fully optimized plan. The physician review indicated that, on average, 88% of all KBP-generated plans were “acceptable as is” and 98% were “acceptable after minor edits.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>KBP models for multiple treatment sites were used as a basis to generate fully automatable, efficient, consistent, high-quality, and clinically acceptable plans. These plans do not require human intervention, demonstrating the potential this work has to significantly impact treatment planning workflows.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110609\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024042713\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024042713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge-based planning for fully automated radiation therapy treatment planning of 10 different cancer sites
Purpose
Radiation treatment planning is highly complex and can have significant inter- and intra-planner inconsistency, as well as variability in planning time and plan quality. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a tool that can be used to efficiently produce high-quality, consistent, clinically acceptable plans, independent of planner skills and experience. In this study, we created and validated multiple clinically acceptable and fully automatable KBP models, with the goal of creating VMAT plans without user intervention.
Methods
Ten KBP models were configured using high quality clinical plans from a single institution. They were then honed to be part of a fully automatable system by incorporating scriptable planning structures, plan creation, and plan optimization. These models were verified and validated using quantitative (model statistics) and qualitative (dose-volume histogram estimation review) analysis. The resulting KBP-generated plans were reviewed by physicians and rated for clinical acceptability.
Results
Autoplanning models were created for anorectal, bladder, breast/chest wall, cervix, esophagus, head and neck, liver, lung/mediastinum, prostate, and prostate with nodes treatment sites. All models were successfully created to be part of a fully automated system without the need for human intervention to create a fully optimized plan. The physician review indicated that, on average, 88% of all KBP-generated plans were “acceptable as is” and 98% were “acceptable after minor edits.”
Conclusion
KBP models for multiple treatment sites were used as a basis to generate fully automatable, efficient, consistent, high-quality, and clinically acceptable plans. These plans do not require human intervention, demonstrating the potential this work has to significantly impact treatment planning workflows.
期刊介绍:
Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.