探索以老年病学评估为导向的康复转诊模式及其对晚期癌症老年人功能结果和存活率的影响。

Rachelle Brick, Marielle Jensen-Battaglia, Brennan P Streck, Lindsey Page, Rachael Tylock, Jenna Cacciatore, Karen Mustian, Jamil Khatri, Jeff Giguere, Elie G Dib, Supriya Mohile, Eva Culakova
{"title":"探索以老年病学评估为导向的康复转诊模式及其对晚期癌症老年人功能结果和存活率的影响。","authors":"Rachelle Brick, Marielle Jensen-Battaglia, Brennan P Streck, Lindsey Page, Rachael Tylock, Jenna Cacciatore, Karen Mustian, Jamil Khatri, Jeff Giguere, Elie G Dib, Supriya Mohile, Eva Culakova","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with advanced cancer experience functional disability that warrants rehabilitation services; however, evidence indicates inconsistencies in referral. The purpose was to (1) identify predictors of geriatric assessment (GA)-driven referrals to rehabilitation services and (2) explore associations between referral and change in function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival among older adults with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis (NCT020107443, UG1CA189961) of a nationwide GA clinical trial. Patients were older adults with advanced cancer who had at least one GA-defined physical performance or functional status impairment. Primary outcomes were oncologist-initiated discussion about or referral to rehabilitation services after the GA (Aim 1) and decline in activities of daily living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and HRQoL within 3 months, and overall survival at 1 year (Exploratory Aims). Analyses included multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Demographic and clinical factors were controlled for by using 1:1 propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 265 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, impaired cognition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.25, p = 0.01), Karnofsky score indicating disability (OR = 2.86, p < 0.01), and receipt of monoclonal antibodies (OR = 1.95, p = 0.04) were associated with higher odds of referral. In contrast, polypharmacy was associated with lower odds of referral (OR = 0.31, p < 0.01). Referred patients were less likely to decline in ADL (OR 0.30, p = 0.07) and IADL (OR 0.64, p = 0.35), but more likely to decline in HRQoL (OR 1.20, p = 0.67) and have worse survival (HR 1.18, p = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cancer treatment, polypharmacy, cognition, and disability status likely influence oncologists' decision to refer for rehabilitation. Referral was not independently associated with change in functional disability, HRQoL, or survival. Future studies should evaluate patients' utilization of rehabilitation services post-referral and determine whether dose/timing of rehabilitation services influence clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring geriatric assessment-driven rehabilitation referral patterns and its influence on functional outcomes and survival in older adults with advanced cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Rachelle Brick, Marielle Jensen-Battaglia, Brennan P Streck, Lindsey Page, Rachael Tylock, Jenna Cacciatore, Karen Mustian, Jamil Khatri, Jeff Giguere, Elie G Dib, Supriya Mohile, Eva Culakova\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with advanced cancer experience functional disability that warrants rehabilitation services; however, evidence indicates inconsistencies in referral. The purpose was to (1) identify predictors of geriatric assessment (GA)-driven referrals to rehabilitation services and (2) explore associations between referral and change in function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival among older adults with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis (NCT020107443, UG1CA189961) of a nationwide GA clinical trial. Patients were older adults with advanced cancer who had at least one GA-defined physical performance or functional status impairment. Primary outcomes were oncologist-initiated discussion about or referral to rehabilitation services after the GA (Aim 1) and decline in activities of daily living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and HRQoL within 3 months, and overall survival at 1 year (Exploratory Aims). Analyses included multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Demographic and clinical factors were controlled for by using 1:1 propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 265 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, impaired cognition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.25, p = 0.01), Karnofsky score indicating disability (OR = 2.86, p < 0.01), and receipt of monoclonal antibodies (OR = 1.95, p = 0.04) were associated with higher odds of referral. In contrast, polypharmacy was associated with lower odds of referral (OR = 0.31, p < 0.01). Referred patients were less likely to decline in ADL (OR 0.30, p = 0.07) and IADL (OR 0.64, p = 0.35), but more likely to decline in HRQoL (OR 1.20, p = 0.67) and have worse survival (HR 1.18, p = 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cancer treatment, polypharmacy, cognition, and disability status likely influence oncologists' decision to refer for rehabilitation. Referral was not independently associated with change in functional disability, HRQoL, or survival. Future studies should evaluate patients' utilization of rehabilitation services post-referral and determine whether dose/timing of rehabilitation services influence clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:晚期癌症患者中的老年人会出现功能障碍,需要接受康复服务;但有证据表明,转诊情况并不一致。研究目的是:(1) 确定老年评估(GA)驱动的康复服务转介的预测因素;(2) 探讨转介与晚期癌症老年人的功能变化、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和总体生存率之间的关系:这是一项全国性 GA 临床试验的二次分析(NCT020107443,UG1CA189961)。患者为晚期癌症老年人,至少有一项 GA 定义的身体表现或功能状态损伤。主要研究结果包括:GA后由肿瘤学家发起的关于康复服务的讨论或转诊(目标1)、3个月内日常生活活动(ADL)、工具性日常生活活动(IADL)和HRQoL的下降以及1年后的总生存率(探索性目标)。分析包括多变量逻辑回归和考克斯比例危险模型。人口统计学和临床因素通过1:1倾向评分匹配进行控制:共对 265 名患者进行了分析。经调整后,认知能力受损(几率比 [OR] = 2.25,P = 0.01)、Karnofsky 评分显示残疾(OR = 2.86,P 结论:这两个因素均与癌症治疗、多药治疗和药物滥用有关:癌症治疗、多药治疗、认知能力和残疾状况可能会影响肿瘤专家转诊康复的决定。转诊与功能性残疾、HRQoL 或生存率的变化并无独立关联。未来的研究应评估患者在转诊后对康复服务的利用情况,并确定康复服务的剂量/时间是否会影响临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring geriatric assessment-driven rehabilitation referral patterns and its influence on functional outcomes and survival in older adults with advanced cancer.

Background: Older adults with advanced cancer experience functional disability that warrants rehabilitation services; however, evidence indicates inconsistencies in referral. The purpose was to (1) identify predictors of geriatric assessment (GA)-driven referrals to rehabilitation services and (2) explore associations between referral and change in function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival among older adults with advanced cancer.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis (NCT020107443, UG1CA189961) of a nationwide GA clinical trial. Patients were older adults with advanced cancer who had at least one GA-defined physical performance or functional status impairment. Primary outcomes were oncologist-initiated discussion about or referral to rehabilitation services after the GA (Aim 1) and decline in activities of daily living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and HRQoL within 3 months, and overall survival at 1 year (Exploratory Aims). Analyses included multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Demographic and clinical factors were controlled for by using 1:1 propensity score matching.

Results: In total 265 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, impaired cognition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.25, p = 0.01), Karnofsky score indicating disability (OR = 2.86, p < 0.01), and receipt of monoclonal antibodies (OR = 1.95, p = 0.04) were associated with higher odds of referral. In contrast, polypharmacy was associated with lower odds of referral (OR = 0.31, p < 0.01). Referred patients were less likely to decline in ADL (OR 0.30, p = 0.07) and IADL (OR 0.64, p = 0.35), but more likely to decline in HRQoL (OR 1.20, p = 0.67) and have worse survival (HR 1.18, p = 0.62).

Conclusions: Cancer treatment, polypharmacy, cognition, and disability status likely influence oncologists' decision to refer for rehabilitation. Referral was not independently associated with change in functional disability, HRQoL, or survival. Future studies should evaluate patients' utilization of rehabilitation services post-referral and determine whether dose/timing of rehabilitation services influence clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Innovation in delirium care: A standardized intervention to reverse inattention using touch and movement. Accelerating the pace of elder justice policy to meet the needs of a growing aging population. Age Self Care, a program to improve aging in place through group learning and incremental behavior change: Preliminary data. Beyond usability: Designing digital health interventions for implementation with older adults. Defining key deprescribing measures from electronic health data: A multisite data harmonization project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1