{"title":"低频重复经颅磁刺激对初发重度抑郁障碍青少年的疗效和安全性:随机、双盲、假对照试验。","authors":"Li-Mei Gu, Can-Jin Deng, De-Wei Shang, Shan-Qing Huang, Sha Nie, Xin-Hu Yang, Yu-Ping Ning, Xing-Bing Huang, Lloyd Balbuena, Yu-Tao Xiang, Wei Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A few sham-controlled studies have examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) in adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder (FE-MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty adolescents (aged 13-17 years) with FE-MDD were randomly assigned to receive active rTMS (n = 20) or sham rTMS (n = 20) for 10 sessions over two weeks. The severity of baseline depressive symptoms and their improvement on the day immediately after the second, fourth, sixth, eighth, and tenth sessions were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After completing 10 rTMS treatment sessions, there was no significant difference in antidepressant response (70.0 % vs. 60.0 %, p > 0.05) and antidepressant remission (55.0 % vs. 35.0 %, p > 0.05) between rTMS groups. The linear mixed model analysis did not show a significant group-by-time interaction (F = 1.26; p > 0.05) in the HAMD-17 scores. There was a significant time main effect on the speed of processing (F = 13.61; p < 0.05), but this did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). There were no other main effects and group-by-time interactions in the other MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery domains (all p > 0.05). All adverse event categories, such as fatigue and headache, were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study that compared a combination of LF-rTMS + medication with sham + medication, LF-rTMS had higher response and remission rates than a sham procedure in adolescents with FE-MDD, but the change was not statistically significant. LF-rTMS is generally safe, with mild adverse effects and no negative impact on neurocognitive performance for adolescents with FE-MDD.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2000037878.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial.\",\"authors\":\"Li-Mei Gu, Can-Jin Deng, De-Wei Shang, Shan-Qing Huang, Sha Nie, Xin-Hu Yang, Yu-Ping Ning, Xing-Bing Huang, Lloyd Balbuena, Yu-Tao Xiang, Wei Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A few sham-controlled studies have examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) in adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder (FE-MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty adolescents (aged 13-17 years) with FE-MDD were randomly assigned to receive active rTMS (n = 20) or sham rTMS (n = 20) for 10 sessions over two weeks. The severity of baseline depressive symptoms and their improvement on the day immediately after the second, fourth, sixth, eighth, and tenth sessions were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After completing 10 rTMS treatment sessions, there was no significant difference in antidepressant response (70.0 % vs. 60.0 %, p > 0.05) and antidepressant remission (55.0 % vs. 35.0 %, p > 0.05) between rTMS groups. The linear mixed model analysis did not show a significant group-by-time interaction (F = 1.26; p > 0.05) in the HAMD-17 scores. There was a significant time main effect on the speed of processing (F = 13.61; p < 0.05), but this did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). There were no other main effects and group-by-time interactions in the other MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery domains (all p > 0.05). All adverse event categories, such as fatigue and headache, were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study that compared a combination of LF-rTMS + medication with sham + medication, LF-rTMS had higher response and remission rates than a sham procedure in adolescents with FE-MDD, but the change was not statistically significant. LF-rTMS is generally safe, with mild adverse effects and no negative impact on neurocognitive performance for adolescents with FE-MDD.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2000037878.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:一些假对照研究考察了低频重复经颅磁刺激(LF-rTMS)对首发重度抑郁障碍(FE-MDD)青少年的疗效、安全性和耐受性:40名患有FE-MDD的青少年(13-17岁)被随机分配到接受主动经颅磁刺激(20人)或假经颅磁刺激(20人),为期两周,共10次。用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-17)的17个项目评估基线抑郁症状的严重程度以及在第二、第四、第六、第八和第十次治疗后第二天的改善情况:在完成10次经颅磁刺激治疗后,经颅磁刺激治疗组之间的抗抑郁反应(70.0% vs. 60.0%,P > 0.05)和抗抑郁缓解(55.0% vs. 35.0%,P > 0.05)无显著差异。线性混合模型分析表明,HAMD-17 评分并不存在显著的组间时间交互作用(F = 1.26;P > 0.05)。处理速度的时间主效应非常明显(F = 13.61;P 0.05)。在 MATRICS 共识认知电池的其他领域中,没有其他主效应和组间时间交互作用(所有 p > 0.05)。所有不良事件类别,如疲劳和头痛,在两组中相似(所有 p > 0.05):结论:本研究比较了LF-经颅磁刺激+药物治疗与假治疗+药物治疗的组合,在患有FE-MDD的青少年中,LF-经颅磁刺激的反应率和缓解率均高于假治疗,但差异无统计学意义。对于患有FE-MDD的青少年来说,LF-rTMS总体上是安全的,不良反应轻微,对神经认知表现没有负面影响:注册号:ChiCTR2000037878。
Efficacy and safety of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial.
Background: A few sham-controlled studies have examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) in adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder (FE-MDD).
Methods: Forty adolescents (aged 13-17 years) with FE-MDD were randomly assigned to receive active rTMS (n = 20) or sham rTMS (n = 20) for 10 sessions over two weeks. The severity of baseline depressive symptoms and their improvement on the day immediately after the second, fourth, sixth, eighth, and tenth sessions were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17).
Results: After completing 10 rTMS treatment sessions, there was no significant difference in antidepressant response (70.0 % vs. 60.0 %, p > 0.05) and antidepressant remission (55.0 % vs. 35.0 %, p > 0.05) between rTMS groups. The linear mixed model analysis did not show a significant group-by-time interaction (F = 1.26; p > 0.05) in the HAMD-17 scores. There was a significant time main effect on the speed of processing (F = 13.61; p < 0.05), but this did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). There were no other main effects and group-by-time interactions in the other MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery domains (all p > 0.05). All adverse event categories, such as fatigue and headache, were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05).
Conclusions: In this study that compared a combination of LF-rTMS + medication with sham + medication, LF-rTMS had higher response and remission rates than a sham procedure in adolescents with FE-MDD, but the change was not statistically significant. LF-rTMS is generally safe, with mild adverse effects and no negative impact on neurocognitive performance for adolescents with FE-MDD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.