对话聊天机器人对戒烟的功效:QuitBot 全面随机对照试验方案。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107727
Jonathan B. Bricker , Brianna M. Sullivan , Kristin E. Mull , Juan Lavista-Ferres , Margarita Santiago-Torres
{"title":"对话聊天机器人对戒烟的功效:QuitBot 全面随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Jonathan B. Bricker ,&nbsp;Brianna M. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Kristin E. Mull ,&nbsp;Juan Lavista-Ferres ,&nbsp;Margarita Santiago-Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, cigarette smoking results in over 8 million premature annual deaths. Addressing this issue requires high-impact, cost-effective population-level interventions for smoking cessation. Conversational chatbots offer a potential solution given the recent advancements in machine learning and large language models. Chatbots can deliver supportive, empathetic behaviors, personalized responses, and timely advice tailored to users' needs that is engaging through therapeutic conversations aimed at creating lasting social-emotional connections. Despite their promise, little is known about the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of chatbots for cigarette smoking cessation. We developed QuitBot, a quit smoking program of two to three-minute conversations covering topics ranging from motivations to quit, setting a quit date, choosing cessation medications, coping with triggers, maintaining abstinence, and recovering from a relapse. QuitBot employs conversational interactions, powered by an expert-curated large language model, allowing users to ask questions and receive personalized guidance on quitting smoking. Here, we report the design and execution of a randomized clinical trial comparing QuitBot (<em>n</em> = 760) against Smokefree TXT (SFT) text messaging program (n = 760), with a 12-month follow-up period. Both interventions include 42-days of content on motivations to quit, skills to cope with triggers, and relapse prevention. The key distinction between QuitBot and SFT is that QuitBot has communication and engagement features. This study aims to determine: whether QuitBot yields higher quit rates than SFT; and whether therapeutic alliance processes and engagement are mechanisms underlying cessation outcomes. Additionally, we will explore whether baseline factors including trust, social support, and demographics, moderate the efficacy of QuitBot.</div><div><strong>Trial Registration number</strong> <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT04308759</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of a conversational chatbot for cigarette smoking cessation: Protocol of the QuitBot full-scale randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan B. Bricker ,&nbsp;Brianna M. Sullivan ,&nbsp;Kristin E. Mull ,&nbsp;Juan Lavista-Ferres ,&nbsp;Margarita Santiago-Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Globally, cigarette smoking results in over 8 million premature annual deaths. Addressing this issue requires high-impact, cost-effective population-level interventions for smoking cessation. Conversational chatbots offer a potential solution given the recent advancements in machine learning and large language models. Chatbots can deliver supportive, empathetic behaviors, personalized responses, and timely advice tailored to users' needs that is engaging through therapeutic conversations aimed at creating lasting social-emotional connections. Despite their promise, little is known about the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of chatbots for cigarette smoking cessation. We developed QuitBot, a quit smoking program of two to three-minute conversations covering topics ranging from motivations to quit, setting a quit date, choosing cessation medications, coping with triggers, maintaining abstinence, and recovering from a relapse. QuitBot employs conversational interactions, powered by an expert-curated large language model, allowing users to ask questions and receive personalized guidance on quitting smoking. Here, we report the design and execution of a randomized clinical trial comparing QuitBot (<em>n</em> = 760) against Smokefree TXT (SFT) text messaging program (n = 760), with a 12-month follow-up period. Both interventions include 42-days of content on motivations to quit, skills to cope with triggers, and relapse prevention. The key distinction between QuitBot and SFT is that QuitBot has communication and engagement features. This study aims to determine: whether QuitBot yields higher quit rates than SFT; and whether therapeutic alliance processes and engagement are mechanisms underlying cessation outcomes. Additionally, we will explore whether baseline factors including trust, social support, and demographics, moderate the efficacy of QuitBot.</div><div><strong>Trial Registration number</strong> <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT04308759</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003100\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424003100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,吸烟每年导致 800 多万人过早死亡。要解决这一问题,就必须采取影响大、成本效益高的人群戒烟干预措施。鉴于机器学习和大型语言模型的最新进展,对话聊天机器人提供了一种潜在的解决方案。聊天机器人可以根据用户的需求,通过旨在建立持久社会情感联系的治疗性对话,提供支持性、移情行为、个性化回复和及时建议。尽管聊天机器人大有可为,但人们对其戒烟功效和内在机制知之甚少。我们开发了戒烟机器人 QuitBot,这是一个由两到三分钟对话组成的戒烟程序,对话主题包括戒烟动机、设定戒烟日期、选择戒烟药物、应对诱因、维持戒烟以及从复吸中恢复。QuitBot 采用对话互动的方式,由专家编辑的大型语言模型提供支持,允许用户提出问题并获得个性化的戒烟指导。在此,我们报告了一项随机临床试验的设计和执行情况,该试验比较了QuitBot(n = 760)和Smokefree TXT(SFT)短信项目(n = 760),并进行了为期12个月的随访。两种干预都包括42天的内容,涉及戒烟动机、应对诱因的技巧和预防复吸。QuitBot 和 SFT 的主要区别在于 QuitBot 的沟通和参与功能。本研究旨在确定:QuitBot 的戒烟率是否高于 SFT;治疗联盟过程和参与是否是戒烟结果的基础机制。此外,我们还将探讨包括信任、社会支持和人口统计学在内的基线因素是否会影响 QuitBot 的疗效。试验注册号ClinicalTrials.govNCT04308759。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of a conversational chatbot for cigarette smoking cessation: Protocol of the QuitBot full-scale randomized controlled trial
Globally, cigarette smoking results in over 8 million premature annual deaths. Addressing this issue requires high-impact, cost-effective population-level interventions for smoking cessation. Conversational chatbots offer a potential solution given the recent advancements in machine learning and large language models. Chatbots can deliver supportive, empathetic behaviors, personalized responses, and timely advice tailored to users' needs that is engaging through therapeutic conversations aimed at creating lasting social-emotional connections. Despite their promise, little is known about the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of chatbots for cigarette smoking cessation. We developed QuitBot, a quit smoking program of two to three-minute conversations covering topics ranging from motivations to quit, setting a quit date, choosing cessation medications, coping with triggers, maintaining abstinence, and recovering from a relapse. QuitBot employs conversational interactions, powered by an expert-curated large language model, allowing users to ask questions and receive personalized guidance on quitting smoking. Here, we report the design and execution of a randomized clinical trial comparing QuitBot (n = 760) against Smokefree TXT (SFT) text messaging program (n = 760), with a 12-month follow-up period. Both interventions include 42-days of content on motivations to quit, skills to cope with triggers, and relapse prevention. The key distinction between QuitBot and SFT is that QuitBot has communication and engagement features. This study aims to determine: whether QuitBot yields higher quit rates than SFT; and whether therapeutic alliance processes and engagement are mechanisms underlying cessation outcomes. Additionally, we will explore whether baseline factors including trust, social support, and demographics, moderate the efficacy of QuitBot.
Trial Registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04308759
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Integrative data analysis of clinical trials network studies to examine the impact of psychosocial treatments for Black people who use cocaine: Study protocol' [Contemporary Clinical Trials 133 (2023) 107329]. A new way to address missing data in late-stage clinical trials. A peer support intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP randomized pilot trial design and methods outline. An evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) in a youth outpatient eating disorders service: A protocol paper. Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1