利用常规患者数据估算参考变化值:一种新颖的病理数据库方法。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvae166
Eirik Åsen Røys, Kristin Viste, Ralf Kellmann, Nora Alicia Guldhaug, Bashir Alaour, Marit Sverresdotter Sylte, Janniche Torsvik, Heidi Strand, Michael Marber, Torbjørn Omland, Elvar Theodorsson, Graham Ross Dallas Jones, Kristin Moberg Aakre
{"title":"利用常规患者数据估算参考变化值:一种新颖的病理数据库方法。","authors":"Eirik Åsen Røys, Kristin Viste, Ralf Kellmann, Nora Alicia Guldhaug, Bashir Alaour, Marit Sverresdotter Sylte, Janniche Torsvik, Heidi Strand, Michael Marber, Torbjørn Omland, Elvar Theodorsson, Graham Ross Dallas Jones, Kristin Moberg Aakre","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reference change value (RCV) is calculated by combining the within-subject biological variation (CVI) and local analytical variation (CVA). These calculations do not account for the variation seen in preanalytical conditions in routine practice or CVI in patients presenting for treatment. As a result, the RCVs may not reflect routine practice or align with clinicians' experiences. We propose a novel RCV approach based on routine patient data that is potentially more clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the refineR algorithm to determine RCVs using serial patient data extracted from a local Laboratory Information System (LIS). The model was applied to biomarkers with a range of result ratio distributions varying from normal to log-normal. Results were compared against conventional formula-based RCVs using CVI estimates from a state-of-the-art biological variation study. Monte Carlo simulations were also used to validate the LIS data approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RCVs estimated from LIS data were: 11-deoxycortisol (men): -70%/+196%, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (men): -49%/+100%, albumin: -10%/+11%, androstenedione (men): -47%/+96%, cortisol (men): -54%/+51%, cortisone (men): -32%/+51%, creatinine: -16%/+14%, phosphate (women): -23%/+29%, phosphate (men): -27%/+29%, testosterone (men): -38%/+60%. The formula-based RCV estimates showed similar but slightly lower results, and the Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the applicability of the new approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCVs may be estimated from patient results without prior assumptions about the shape of the ratios between serial results. Laboratories can determine RCVs based on local practice and population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Reference Change Values Using Routine Patient Data: A Novel Pathology Database Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Eirik Åsen Røys, Kristin Viste, Ralf Kellmann, Nora Alicia Guldhaug, Bashir Alaour, Marit Sverresdotter Sylte, Janniche Torsvik, Heidi Strand, Michael Marber, Torbjørn Omland, Elvar Theodorsson, Graham Ross Dallas Jones, Kristin Moberg Aakre\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvae166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reference change value (RCV) is calculated by combining the within-subject biological variation (CVI) and local analytical variation (CVA). These calculations do not account for the variation seen in preanalytical conditions in routine practice or CVI in patients presenting for treatment. As a result, the RCVs may not reflect routine practice or align with clinicians' experiences. We propose a novel RCV approach based on routine patient data that is potentially more clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the refineR algorithm to determine RCVs using serial patient data extracted from a local Laboratory Information System (LIS). The model was applied to biomarkers with a range of result ratio distributions varying from normal to log-normal. Results were compared against conventional formula-based RCVs using CVI estimates from a state-of-the-art biological variation study. Monte Carlo simulations were also used to validate the LIS data approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RCVs estimated from LIS data were: 11-deoxycortisol (men): -70%/+196%, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (men): -49%/+100%, albumin: -10%/+11%, androstenedione (men): -47%/+96%, cortisol (men): -54%/+51%, cortisone (men): -32%/+51%, creatinine: -16%/+14%, phosphate (women): -23%/+29%, phosphate (men): -27%/+29%, testosterone (men): -38%/+60%. The formula-based RCV estimates showed similar but slightly lower results, and the Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the applicability of the new approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCVs may be estimated from patient results without prior assumptions about the shape of the ratios between serial results. Laboratories can determine RCVs based on local practice and population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae166\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:参考变化值 (RCV) 是结合受试者内生物变异 (CVI) 和局部分析变异 (CVA) 计算得出的。这些计算方法没有考虑到常规做法中分析前条件的变化或接受治疗的患者的 CVI。因此,RCV 可能无法反映常规做法或与临床医生的经验不符。我们提出了一种基于常规患者数据的新型 RCV 方法,该方法可能更贴近临床:本研究使用 refineR 算法,利用从当地实验室信息系统(LIS)中提取的患者序列数据确定 RCV。该模型适用于具有从正态到对数正态分布的一系列结果比值的生物标记物。利用最新生物变异研究的 CVI 估计值,将结果与传统的基于公式的 RCV 进行了比较。蒙特卡罗模拟也用于验证 LIS 数据方法:结果:根据 LIS 数据估算出的 RCV 为11-脱氧皮质醇(男性):-70%/+196%,17-羟孕酮(男性):-49%/+100%,白蛋白:-10%/+11%,雄烯二酮(男性):-47%/+96%,皮质醇(男性):-54%/+51%,可的松(男性):-32%/+51%,肌酐:-16%/+14%,磷酸盐(女性):-23%/+29%,磷酸盐(男性):-27%/+29%,睾酮(男性):-38%/+60%.基于公式的 RCV 估值显示出相似但略低的结果,蒙特卡罗模拟证实了新方法的适用性:结论:RCV 可根据患者结果估算,而无需事先假设序列结果之间的比率形状。实验室可根据当地的实践和人口情况确定 RCV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating Reference Change Values Using Routine Patient Data: A Novel Pathology Database Approach.

Background: The reference change value (RCV) is calculated by combining the within-subject biological variation (CVI) and local analytical variation (CVA). These calculations do not account for the variation seen in preanalytical conditions in routine practice or CVI in patients presenting for treatment. As a result, the RCVs may not reflect routine practice or align with clinicians' experiences. We propose a novel RCV approach based on routine patient data that is potentially more clinically relevant.

Methods: This study used the refineR algorithm to determine RCVs using serial patient data extracted from a local Laboratory Information System (LIS). The model was applied to biomarkers with a range of result ratio distributions varying from normal to log-normal. Results were compared against conventional formula-based RCVs using CVI estimates from a state-of-the-art biological variation study. Monte Carlo simulations were also used to validate the LIS data approach.

Results: The RCVs estimated from LIS data were: 11-deoxycortisol (men): -70%/+196%, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (men): -49%/+100%, albumin: -10%/+11%, androstenedione (men): -47%/+96%, cortisol (men): -54%/+51%, cortisone (men): -32%/+51%, creatinine: -16%/+14%, phosphate (women): -23%/+29%, phosphate (men): -27%/+29%, testosterone (men): -38%/+60%. The formula-based RCV estimates showed similar but slightly lower results, and the Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the applicability of the new approach.

Conclusions: RCVs may be estimated from patient results without prior assumptions about the shape of the ratios between serial results. Laboratories can determine RCVs based on local practice and population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Gene Panels Have a Superior Diagnostic Yield for Inherited Rare Diseases Relative to Static Panels Xylazine Pharmacokinetics in Patients Testing Positive for Fentanyl and Xylazine. Prospective and External Validation of an Ensemble Learning Approach to Sensitively Detect Intravenous Fluid Contamination in Basic Metabolic Panels Niacin and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: Deciphering the Paradox. Alzheimer Disease Blood-Based Biomarkers: Translation from Research into Clinical Use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1