美国和欧洲重度抑郁症和酒精使用障碍患病率性别差异的宏观决定因素。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.082
Daniel Hagen , Clare Bambra , Danielle C. Ompad , Emily Goldmann
{"title":"美国和欧洲重度抑郁症和酒精使用障碍患病率性别差异的宏观决定因素。","authors":"Daniel Hagen ,&nbsp;Clare Bambra ,&nbsp;Danielle C. Ompad ,&nbsp;Emily Goldmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are leading psychiatric causes of burden of disease. Although research has found pronounced gender differences in these disorders, the magnitude of these differences varies substantially between settings. However, integrated analyses of both disorders are lacking, limiting the comparability of findings. Moreover, few studies conceptualize political and socio-cultural characteristics as separate macro-level determinants of gender differences. This paper analyzes the association between gender differences in the prevalence of <em>both</em> MDD and AUD with social policy expenditures and indicators of gender equality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data for adults from the U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2006/2008 (<em>n</em> = 234,020) and the European Social Survey 2014 (<em>n</em> = 30,416) were used. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted using modified Poisson regression models adjusted for individual-level and macro-level covariates; multiplicative and additive interaction were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Social policy expenditures and support for gender equality were negatively associated with gender differences in AUD in Europe (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), with the male excess prevalence varying between 26.1 % at lowest and 9.4 % at highest observed levels of expenditures, and between 23.3 % at lowest and 6.8 % at highest levels of gender equality. In the U.S., state-level reproductive rights were negatively associated with gender differences in AUD (<em>p</em> = 0.036). No equivalent effects were observed for gender differences in MDD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The prevalence of AUD among men and women tends to converge in settings with higher levels of social policy generosity and gender equality, respectively. This effect does not seem to apply to gender differences in MDD in either setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"370 ","pages":"Pages 301-312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macro-level determinants of gender differences in the prevalence of major depression and alcohol use disorder in the United States and across Europe\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Hagen ,&nbsp;Clare Bambra ,&nbsp;Danielle C. Ompad ,&nbsp;Emily Goldmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are leading psychiatric causes of burden of disease. Although research has found pronounced gender differences in these disorders, the magnitude of these differences varies substantially between settings. However, integrated analyses of both disorders are lacking, limiting the comparability of findings. Moreover, few studies conceptualize political and socio-cultural characteristics as separate macro-level determinants of gender differences. This paper analyzes the association between gender differences in the prevalence of <em>both</em> MDD and AUD with social policy expenditures and indicators of gender equality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data for adults from the U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2006/2008 (<em>n</em> = 234,020) and the European Social Survey 2014 (<em>n</em> = 30,416) were used. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted using modified Poisson regression models adjusted for individual-level and macro-level covariates; multiplicative and additive interaction were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Social policy expenditures and support for gender equality were negatively associated with gender differences in AUD in Europe (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), with the male excess prevalence varying between 26.1 % at lowest and 9.4 % at highest observed levels of expenditures, and between 23.3 % at lowest and 6.8 % at highest levels of gender equality. In the U.S., state-level reproductive rights were negatively associated with gender differences in AUD (<em>p</em> = 0.036). No equivalent effects were observed for gender differences in MDD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The prevalence of AUD among men and women tends to converge in settings with higher levels of social policy generosity and gender equality, respectively. This effect does not seem to apply to gender differences in MDD in either setting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\"370 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 301-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724017798\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724017798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和酒精使用障碍(AUD)是造成疾病负担的主要精神原因。尽管研究发现这两种疾病存在明显的性别差异,但差异的程度在不同环境下却有很大不同。然而,目前还缺乏对这两种疾病的综合分析,从而限制了研究结果的可比性。此外,很少有研究将政治和社会文化特征视为性别差异的单独宏观决定因素。本文分析了 MDD 和 AUD 患病率的性别差异与社会政策支出和性别平等指标之间的关联:方法:采用美国行为风险因素监测系统 2006/2008 年(n = 234,020 人)和欧洲社会调查 2014 年(n = 30,416 人)的成人数据。使用修正的泊松回归模型进行了横截面分析,并对个人层面和宏观层面的协变量进行了调整;对乘法和加法交互作用进行了评估:在欧洲,社会政策支出和对性别平等的支持与 AUD 的性别差异呈负相关(P在社会政策慷慨程度和性别平等程度较高的环境中,男性和女性的 AUD 患病率趋于一致。这种效应似乎并不适用于这两种环境中 MDD 的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macro-level determinants of gender differences in the prevalence of major depression and alcohol use disorder in the United States and across Europe

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are leading psychiatric causes of burden of disease. Although research has found pronounced gender differences in these disorders, the magnitude of these differences varies substantially between settings. However, integrated analyses of both disorders are lacking, limiting the comparability of findings. Moreover, few studies conceptualize political and socio-cultural characteristics as separate macro-level determinants of gender differences. This paper analyzes the association between gender differences in the prevalence of both MDD and AUD with social policy expenditures and indicators of gender equality.

Methods

Data for adults from the U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2006/2008 (n = 234,020) and the European Social Survey 2014 (n = 30,416) were used. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted using modified Poisson regression models adjusted for individual-level and macro-level covariates; multiplicative and additive interaction were evaluated.

Results

Social policy expenditures and support for gender equality were negatively associated with gender differences in AUD in Europe (p < 0.001), with the male excess prevalence varying between 26.1 % at lowest and 9.4 % at highest observed levels of expenditures, and between 23.3 % at lowest and 6.8 % at highest levels of gender equality. In the U.S., state-level reproductive rights were negatively associated with gender differences in AUD (p = 0.036). No equivalent effects were observed for gender differences in MDD.

Conclusion

The prevalence of AUD among men and women tends to converge in settings with higher levels of social policy generosity and gender equality, respectively. This effect does not seem to apply to gender differences in MDD in either setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
A study on the plasma proteomics of different types of depressive disorders based on label-free data-independent acquisition proteomic technology. An ERP study characterizing how trait anxiety modulates proactive and reactive response inhibition independent of different emotional contexts. Gut microbiotas, inflammatory factors, and mental-behavioral disorders: A mendelian randomization study. Shadows of the past - Hierarchical regression analyses on the role of childhood maltreatment experiences for postpartum depression. Using dynamic graph convolutional network to identify individuals with major depression disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1