增强脂质纳米颗粒中的 RNA 封装定量:RiboGreen 试验中 Triton X-100 的可持续替代品。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114571
David Schultz , Rasmus D. Münter , Alex M. Cantín , Paul J. Kempen , Nadin Jahnke , Thomas L. Andresen , Jens B. Simonsen , Andrew J. Urquhart
{"title":"增强脂质纳米颗粒中的 RNA 封装定量:RiboGreen 试验中 Triton X-100 的可持续替代品。","authors":"David Schultz ,&nbsp;Rasmus D. Münter ,&nbsp;Alex M. Cantín ,&nbsp;Paul J. Kempen ,&nbsp;Nadin Jahnke ,&nbsp;Thomas L. Andresen ,&nbsp;Jens B. Simonsen ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Urquhart","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To quantify concentration and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of mRNA in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) the RiboGreen assay is extensively used. As part of this assay, a surfactant is used to release mRNA from LNPs for detection with the RiboGreen dye. So far, the surfactant of choice has been Triton X-100, which is harmful to human health and the environment. Alternatives to Triton X-100 are therefore needed, but surprisingly no such effort has yet been described in the literature. Here we show how three, less harmful, surfactants (Brij 93, Zwittergent 3–14 and Tween 20) compare to Triton X-100 for releasing mRNA from LNPs for detection with the RiboGreen assay. We found that Zwittergent 3–14 and Tween 20 at high concentrations (0.5 %) are at the minimum as effective as Triton X-100 at high concentration (0.5 %) across three different mRNA-LNP formulations. Interestingly, Tween 20 was the most effective at releasing mRNA from LNPs, across all concentration ranges explored (0.0025 %, 0.01 %, 0.1 % and to 0.5 % (v/v)) highlighting its potency at solubilizing the three different LNP formulations. Our results show that Tween 20 can be used as an alternative to Triton X-100 in the RiboGreen assay, resulting in more accurate quantification of the total mRNA concentration and EE%, as well as making the assay more environmentally friendly. Such improvement could potentially increase the likelihood of identifying therapeutically attractive hard-to-solubilize LNP-mRNA formulations that would be discharged when using Triton X-100 due to their apparent low EE values, as well as ensure more accurate mRNA dosing in both in vitro and in vivo studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12024,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 114571"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing RNA encapsulation quantification in lipid nanoparticles: Sustainable alternatives to Triton X-100 in the RiboGreen assay\",\"authors\":\"David Schultz ,&nbsp;Rasmus D. Münter ,&nbsp;Alex M. Cantín ,&nbsp;Paul J. Kempen ,&nbsp;Nadin Jahnke ,&nbsp;Thomas L. Andresen ,&nbsp;Jens B. Simonsen ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Urquhart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To quantify concentration and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of mRNA in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) the RiboGreen assay is extensively used. As part of this assay, a surfactant is used to release mRNA from LNPs for detection with the RiboGreen dye. So far, the surfactant of choice has been Triton X-100, which is harmful to human health and the environment. Alternatives to Triton X-100 are therefore needed, but surprisingly no such effort has yet been described in the literature. Here we show how three, less harmful, surfactants (Brij 93, Zwittergent 3–14 and Tween 20) compare to Triton X-100 for releasing mRNA from LNPs for detection with the RiboGreen assay. We found that Zwittergent 3–14 and Tween 20 at high concentrations (0.5 %) are at the minimum as effective as Triton X-100 at high concentration (0.5 %) across three different mRNA-LNP formulations. Interestingly, Tween 20 was the most effective at releasing mRNA from LNPs, across all concentration ranges explored (0.0025 %, 0.01 %, 0.1 % and to 0.5 % (v/v)) highlighting its potency at solubilizing the three different LNP formulations. Our results show that Tween 20 can be used as an alternative to Triton X-100 in the RiboGreen assay, resulting in more accurate quantification of the total mRNA concentration and EE%, as well as making the assay more environmentally friendly. Such improvement could potentially increase the likelihood of identifying therapeutically attractive hard-to-solubilize LNP-mRNA formulations that would be discharged when using Triton X-100 due to their apparent low EE values, as well as ensure more accurate mRNA dosing in both in vitro and in vivo studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641124003977\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641124003977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了量化脂质纳米粒子(LNPs)中 mRNA 的浓度和封装效率(EE),RiboGreen 分析法被广泛使用。作为该检测方法的一部分,表面活性剂被用来从 LNPs 中释放 mRNA,以便用 RiboGreen 染料进行检测。迄今为止,首选的表面活性剂是 Triton X-100,它对人体健康和环境有害。因此,我们需要 Triton X-100 的替代品,但令人惊讶的是,文献中还没有这方面的描述。在这里,我们展示了三种危害较小的表面活性剂(Brij 93、Zwittergent 3-14 和 Tween 20)与 Triton X-100 相比,如何从 LNPs 中释放 mRNA,以便用 RiboGreen 检测法进行检测。我们发现,在三种不同的 mRNA-LNP 配方中,高浓度(0.5%)的 Zwittergent 3-14 和 Tween 20 与高浓度(0.5%)的 Triton X-100 的效果相当。有趣的是,在所探讨的所有浓度范围(0.0025%、0.01%、0.1% 至 0.5%(v/v))内,吐温 20 从 LNPs 中释放 mRNA 的效果最好,这凸显了它对三种不同 LNP 配方的增溶作用。我们的研究结果表明,在 RiboGreen 检测中,吐温 20 可替代 Triton X-100,从而更准确地量化总 mRNA 浓度和 EE%,并使检测更环保。这种改进有可能提高识别具有治疗吸引力的难以溶解的 LNP-mRNA 制剂的可能性,这些制剂在使用 Triton X-100 时会因其明显的低 EE 值而被排出,同时还能确保在体外和体内研究中的 mRNA 剂量更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing RNA encapsulation quantification in lipid nanoparticles: Sustainable alternatives to Triton X-100 in the RiboGreen assay
To quantify concentration and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of mRNA in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) the RiboGreen assay is extensively used. As part of this assay, a surfactant is used to release mRNA from LNPs for detection with the RiboGreen dye. So far, the surfactant of choice has been Triton X-100, which is harmful to human health and the environment. Alternatives to Triton X-100 are therefore needed, but surprisingly no such effort has yet been described in the literature. Here we show how three, less harmful, surfactants (Brij 93, Zwittergent 3–14 and Tween 20) compare to Triton X-100 for releasing mRNA from LNPs for detection with the RiboGreen assay. We found that Zwittergent 3–14 and Tween 20 at high concentrations (0.5 %) are at the minimum as effective as Triton X-100 at high concentration (0.5 %) across three different mRNA-LNP formulations. Interestingly, Tween 20 was the most effective at releasing mRNA from LNPs, across all concentration ranges explored (0.0025 %, 0.01 %, 0.1 % and to 0.5 % (v/v)) highlighting its potency at solubilizing the three different LNP formulations. Our results show that Tween 20 can be used as an alternative to Triton X-100 in the RiboGreen assay, resulting in more accurate quantification of the total mRNA concentration and EE%, as well as making the assay more environmentally friendly. Such improvement could potentially increase the likelihood of identifying therapeutically attractive hard-to-solubilize LNP-mRNA formulations that would be discharged when using Triton X-100 due to their apparent low EE values, as well as ensure more accurate mRNA dosing in both in vitro and in vivo studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
211
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics provides a medium for the publication of novel, innovative and hypothesis-driven research from the areas of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. Topics covered include for example: Design and development of drug delivery systems for pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals (small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids) Aspects of manufacturing process design Biomedical aspects of drug product design Strategies and formulations for controlled drug transport across biological barriers Physicochemical aspects of drug product development Novel excipients for drug product design Drug delivery and controlled release systems for systemic and local applications Nanomaterials for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes Advanced therapy medicinal products Medical devices supporting a distinct pharmacological effect.
期刊最新文献
Continuous twin-screw melt granulation of drug-loaded electrospun fibers. Homogeneity analysis of medicine tablets by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with multivariate methods. Antifungal peptide-loaded alginate microfiber wound dressing evaluated against Candida albicans in vitro and ex vivo Challenges in the development of long acting injectable multivesicular liposomes (DepoFoam® technology) Comparing effects of terpene-based deep eutectic solvent and solid microneedles on skin permeation of drugs with varying lipophilicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1