在创伤性脑损伤中使用 Khanna NuCrani 钢板进行动态开颅手术,作为使用固定钢板进行开颅手术的替代方案。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003244
Paul R Krafft, Ian Tafel, Anjali Khanna, Patrick Han, Rohit Khanna
{"title":"在创伤性脑损伤中使用 Khanna NuCrani 钢板进行动态开颅手术,作为使用固定钢板进行开颅手术的替代方案。","authors":"Paul R Krafft, Ian Tafel, Anjali Khanna, Patrick Han, Rohit Khanna","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Dynamic craniotomy as opposed to a fixed plate craniotomy provides cranial decompression with a controlled outward bone flap movement to accommodate postoperative cerebral swelling and/or hemorrhage. The objective of this study was to evaluate if fixation of the bone flap following a trauma craniotomy with dynamic plates provides any advantage over fixed plates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of our clinical series of 25 consecutive adult patients undergoing dynamic craniotomy with the Khanna NuCrani reversibly expandable bone flap fixation plates for the treatment of traumatic brain injury associated with mass lesions including subdural, epidural, and cerebral hematomas was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative cerebral swelling was encountered in 21 of 25 patients (84%), which was compensated for with outward bone flap movement in all these patients and associated decreased midline shift. Severe brain swelling with outward bone flap movement of 8 mm or more was noted in 40% of the patients. All patients had a normal intracranial pressure after surgery. None of the patients required any reoperations for hematoma evacuation, rescue decompressive craniectomies, cranioplasty, or complications related to wound healing. The bone flap retracted after the resolution of the brain swelling, and none of the patients reported cosmetic symptoms related to bone flap or wound healing. Overall, 84% (21 of 25) of the patients achieved a good outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Craniotomy bone flap fixation with dynamic plates is an alternative to craniotomy with fixed plates. The main advantage of dynamic craniotomy over a craniotomy with fixed plates is that it allows for immediate intracranial volume expansion with reversible outward bone flap migration in patients who may develop postoperative worsening brain swelling and/or hemorrhage, with decreased need for repeat surgeries and associated complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Craniotomy With Khanna NuCrani Plates as an Alternative to Craniotomy With Fixed Plates in Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Paul R Krafft, Ian Tafel, Anjali Khanna, Patrick Han, Rohit Khanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Dynamic craniotomy as opposed to a fixed plate craniotomy provides cranial decompression with a controlled outward bone flap movement to accommodate postoperative cerebral swelling and/or hemorrhage. The objective of this study was to evaluate if fixation of the bone flap following a trauma craniotomy with dynamic plates provides any advantage over fixed plates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of our clinical series of 25 consecutive adult patients undergoing dynamic craniotomy with the Khanna NuCrani reversibly expandable bone flap fixation plates for the treatment of traumatic brain injury associated with mass lesions including subdural, epidural, and cerebral hematomas was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative cerebral swelling was encountered in 21 of 25 patients (84%), which was compensated for with outward bone flap movement in all these patients and associated decreased midline shift. Severe brain swelling with outward bone flap movement of 8 mm or more was noted in 40% of the patients. All patients had a normal intracranial pressure after surgery. None of the patients required any reoperations for hematoma evacuation, rescue decompressive craniectomies, cranioplasty, or complications related to wound healing. The bone flap retracted after the resolution of the brain swelling, and none of the patients reported cosmetic symptoms related to bone flap or wound healing. Overall, 84% (21 of 25) of the patients achieved a good outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Craniotomy bone flap fixation with dynamic plates is an alternative to craniotomy with fixed plates. The main advantage of dynamic craniotomy over a craniotomy with fixed plates is that it allows for immediate intracranial volume expansion with reversible outward bone flap migration in patients who may develop postoperative worsening brain swelling and/or hemorrhage, with decreased need for repeat surgeries and associated complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003244\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:与固定钢板开颅术相比,动态开颅术可在控制骨瓣向外移动的情况下进行颅骨减压,以适应术后脑肿胀和/或出血。本研究的目的是评估使用动态钢板固定创伤开颅术后的骨瓣是否比固定钢板更有优势:方法:我们对连续 25 例接受动态开颅手术并使用 Khanna NuCrani 可逆扩张骨瓣固定板治疗创伤性脑损伤伴肿块病变(包括硬膜下、硬膜外和脑血肿)的成年患者的临床系列进行了回顾性研究:结果:25 例患者中有 21 例(84%)术后出现脑肿胀,所有这些患者都通过骨瓣外移得到了补偿,中线移位也随之减少。40%的患者出现了严重的脑肿胀,骨瓣外移达 8 毫米或更多。所有患者术后颅内压均正常。没有一名患者因血肿清除、减压开颅手术、颅骨成形术或伤口愈合相关并发症而需要再次手术。骨瓣在脑肿胀消退后回缩,没有患者报告与骨瓣或伤口愈合有关的外观症状。总体而言,84%的患者(25例中的21例)取得了良好的疗效:结论:用动态钢板固定开颅骨瓣是固定钢板开颅术的一种替代方法。与使用固定钢板的开颅手术相比,动态开颅手术的主要优势在于,对于术后可能出现脑肿胀加重和/或出血的患者,动态开颅手术可使颅内体积立即扩大,骨瓣可逆性外移,减少了重复手术的需要和相关并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamic Craniotomy With Khanna NuCrani Plates as an Alternative to Craniotomy With Fixed Plates in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background and objectives: Dynamic craniotomy as opposed to a fixed plate craniotomy provides cranial decompression with a controlled outward bone flap movement to accommodate postoperative cerebral swelling and/or hemorrhage. The objective of this study was to evaluate if fixation of the bone flap following a trauma craniotomy with dynamic plates provides any advantage over fixed plates.

Methods: A review of our clinical series of 25 consecutive adult patients undergoing dynamic craniotomy with the Khanna NuCrani reversibly expandable bone flap fixation plates for the treatment of traumatic brain injury associated with mass lesions including subdural, epidural, and cerebral hematomas was conducted.

Results: Postoperative cerebral swelling was encountered in 21 of 25 patients (84%), which was compensated for with outward bone flap movement in all these patients and associated decreased midline shift. Severe brain swelling with outward bone flap movement of 8 mm or more was noted in 40% of the patients. All patients had a normal intracranial pressure after surgery. None of the patients required any reoperations for hematoma evacuation, rescue decompressive craniectomies, cranioplasty, or complications related to wound healing. The bone flap retracted after the resolution of the brain swelling, and none of the patients reported cosmetic symptoms related to bone flap or wound healing. Overall, 84% (21 of 25) of the patients achieved a good outcome.

Conclusion: Craniotomy bone flap fixation with dynamic plates is an alternative to craniotomy with fixed plates. The main advantage of dynamic craniotomy over a craniotomy with fixed plates is that it allows for immediate intracranial volume expansion with reversible outward bone flap migration in patients who may develop postoperative worsening brain swelling and/or hemorrhage, with decreased need for repeat surgeries and associated complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade 1 International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K1 Study. Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade I International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K1 Study. Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade II International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K2 Study. Clinical Benefits of Photodynamic Therapy Using Talaporfin Sodium in Patients With Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Study of 100 Cases. Dynamic Craniotomy With Khanna NuCrani Plates as an Alternative to Craniotomy With Fixed Plates in Traumatic Brain Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1