切除口腔鳞状细胞癌的边缘深度比作为独立预后因素: 一项全国性队列研究。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107102
Hanpon Klibngern , Chung-Jan Kang , Li-Yu Lee , Shu-Hang Ng , Chien-Yu Lin , Kang-Hsing Fan , Wen-Cheng Chen , Jin-Ching Lin , Yao-Te Tsai , Shu-Ru Lee , Chih-Yen Chien , Chun-Hung Hua , Cheng-Ping Wang , Tsung-Ming Chen , Shyuang-Der Terng , Chi-Ying Tsai , Hung-Ming Wang , Chia-Hsun Hsieh , Chih-Hua Yeh , Chih-Hung Lin , Chun-Ta Liao
{"title":"切除口腔鳞状细胞癌的边缘深度比作为独立预后因素: 一项全国性队列研究。","authors":"Hanpon Klibngern ,&nbsp;Chung-Jan Kang ,&nbsp;Li-Yu Lee ,&nbsp;Shu-Hang Ng ,&nbsp;Chien-Yu Lin ,&nbsp;Kang-Hsing Fan ,&nbsp;Wen-Cheng Chen ,&nbsp;Jin-Ching Lin ,&nbsp;Yao-Te Tsai ,&nbsp;Shu-Ru Lee ,&nbsp;Chih-Yen Chien ,&nbsp;Chun-Hung Hua ,&nbsp;Cheng-Ping Wang ,&nbsp;Tsung-Ming Chen ,&nbsp;Shyuang-Der Terng ,&nbsp;Chi-Ying Tsai ,&nbsp;Hung-Ming Wang ,&nbsp;Chia-Hsun Hsieh ,&nbsp;Chih-Hua Yeh ,&nbsp;Chih-Hung Lin ,&nbsp;Chun-Ta Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prognostic significance of margin-to-depth ratio (MDR) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains unclear, particularly in comparison to traditional margin status. We aimed to examine the association between MDR and clinical outcomes in a large Taiwanese cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 18,324 patients with first primary OCSCC were categorized by margin status: positive (1013), &lt;5 mm (8371), and ≥ 5 mm (8940). Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) served as the main outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After excluding patients with positive margins (MDR = 0), the optimal MDR cutoff value for DSS and OS was 0.6. Patients with MDR &gt; 0.6 showed significantly better 5-year DSS and OS rates (87 %, 81 %) compared to those with MDR ≤ 0.6 (71 %, 63 %) and MDR = 0 (53 %, 43 %). Multivariable analysis identified MDR ≤ 0.6 as independently associated with both DSS and OS in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34/1.32). This finding was consistent in the subgroups with surgical margins &lt; 5 mm (HR = 1.39 for DSS and 1.38 for OS) and margins ≥ 5 mm (HR = 1.21 for both DSS and OS). In subgroups with surgical margins &lt; 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm, an MDR &gt; 0.6 was associated with better survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An MDR (cutoff: 0.6) is independently associated with prognosis in OCSCC, offering improved risk stratification compared to margin status alone. While MDR may guide surgical margin modification, further research is needed to determine whether MDR could serve as a postoperative indicator for adjuvant therapy in patients with close or clear margins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 107102"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Margin-to-depth ratio as an independent prognostic factor in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Hanpon Klibngern ,&nbsp;Chung-Jan Kang ,&nbsp;Li-Yu Lee ,&nbsp;Shu-Hang Ng ,&nbsp;Chien-Yu Lin ,&nbsp;Kang-Hsing Fan ,&nbsp;Wen-Cheng Chen ,&nbsp;Jin-Ching Lin ,&nbsp;Yao-Te Tsai ,&nbsp;Shu-Ru Lee ,&nbsp;Chih-Yen Chien ,&nbsp;Chun-Hung Hua ,&nbsp;Cheng-Ping Wang ,&nbsp;Tsung-Ming Chen ,&nbsp;Shyuang-Der Terng ,&nbsp;Chi-Ying Tsai ,&nbsp;Hung-Ming Wang ,&nbsp;Chia-Hsun Hsieh ,&nbsp;Chih-Hua Yeh ,&nbsp;Chih-Hung Lin ,&nbsp;Chun-Ta Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prognostic significance of margin-to-depth ratio (MDR) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains unclear, particularly in comparison to traditional margin status. We aimed to examine the association between MDR and clinical outcomes in a large Taiwanese cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 18,324 patients with first primary OCSCC were categorized by margin status: positive (1013), &lt;5 mm (8371), and ≥ 5 mm (8940). Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) served as the main outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After excluding patients with positive margins (MDR = 0), the optimal MDR cutoff value for DSS and OS was 0.6. Patients with MDR &gt; 0.6 showed significantly better 5-year DSS and OS rates (87 %, 81 %) compared to those with MDR ≤ 0.6 (71 %, 63 %) and MDR = 0 (53 %, 43 %). Multivariable analysis identified MDR ≤ 0.6 as independently associated with both DSS and OS in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34/1.32). This finding was consistent in the subgroups with surgical margins &lt; 5 mm (HR = 1.39 for DSS and 1.38 for OS) and margins ≥ 5 mm (HR = 1.21 for both DSS and OS). In subgroups with surgical margins &lt; 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm, an MDR &gt; 0.6 was associated with better survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An MDR (cutoff: 0.6) is independently associated with prognosis in OCSCC, offering improved risk stratification compared to margin status alone. While MDR may guide surgical margin modification, further research is needed to determine whether MDR could serve as a postoperative indicator for adjuvant therapy in patients with close or clear margins.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524004202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524004202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口腔鳞状细胞癌(OCSCC)边缘深度比(MDR)的预后意义仍不明确,尤其是与传统的边缘状态相比。我们的目的是在一个大型台湾队列中研究 MDR 与临床预后之间的关系:方法:共对 18,324 例首次原发性 OCSCC 患者按边缘状态进行了分类:阳性(1013 例)、阴性(1013 例)、阳性(1013 例)、阴性(1013 例)和阳性(1013 例):排除边缘阳性(MDR = 0)患者后,DSS 和 OS 的最佳 MDR 临界值为 0.6。与 MDR ≤ 0.6(71%,63%)和 MDR = 0(53%,43%)的患者相比,MDR > 0.6 的患者的 5 年 DSS 和 OS 率明显更高(87%,81%)。多变量分析发现,在整个队列中,MDR≤0.6与DSS和OS均有独立相关性(危险比[HR] = 1.34/1.32)。这一结果在手术切缘为0.6的亚组中也是一致的,因为0.6与更好的生存结果相关:结论:MDR(临界值:0.6)与OCSCC的预后密切相关,与单纯的边缘状态相比,MDR能更好地进行风险分层。虽然MDR可以指导手术切缘的修改,但还需要进一步研究,以确定MDR是否可以作为切缘紧密或清晰患者术后辅助治疗的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Margin-to-depth ratio as an independent prognostic factor in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study

Background

The prognostic significance of margin-to-depth ratio (MDR) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains unclear, particularly in comparison to traditional margin status. We aimed to examine the association between MDR and clinical outcomes in a large Taiwanese cohort.

Methods

A total of 18,324 patients with first primary OCSCC were categorized by margin status: positive (1013), <5 mm (8371), and ≥ 5 mm (8940). Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) served as the main outcome measures.

Results

After excluding patients with positive margins (MDR = 0), the optimal MDR cutoff value for DSS and OS was 0.6. Patients with MDR > 0.6 showed significantly better 5-year DSS and OS rates (87 %, 81 %) compared to those with MDR ≤ 0.6 (71 %, 63 %) and MDR = 0 (53 %, 43 %). Multivariable analysis identified MDR ≤ 0.6 as independently associated with both DSS and OS in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34/1.32). This finding was consistent in the subgroups with surgical margins < 5 mm (HR = 1.39 for DSS and 1.38 for OS) and margins ≥ 5 mm (HR = 1.21 for both DSS and OS). In subgroups with surgical margins < 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm, an MDR > 0.6 was associated with better survival outcomes.

Conclusions

An MDR (cutoff: 0.6) is independently associated with prognosis in OCSCC, offering improved risk stratification compared to margin status alone. While MDR may guide surgical margin modification, further research is needed to determine whether MDR could serve as a postoperative indicator for adjuvant therapy in patients with close or clear margins.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral oncology
Oral oncology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck. Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Extensive necrosis of the tongue as a very early adverse event of head and neck radiotherapy". Comment on "Surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for cT1-T3 supraglottic laryngeal cancers: A systematic review". Selperctinib as neoadjuvant therapy for RET-altered papillary thyroid carcinoma: Two case reports. Association of race and ethnicity with quality of care among head and neck cancer patients in California. Immunotherapeutic strategies beyond the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - A scoping review on current developments in agents targeting TIM-3, TIGIT, LAG-3, and VISTA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1