爬楼梯干预能降低餐后高血糖,但不能降低认知功能:一项随机交叉试验的结果。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Physiology & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114726
Eswaran Tpm Thirunavukarasu, Manaswi Reddy, Baskaran Chandrasekaran, Arun G Maiya, Chythra R Rao
{"title":"爬楼梯干预能降低餐后高血糖,但不能降低认知功能:一项随机交叉试验的结果。","authors":"Eswaran Tpm Thirunavukarasu, Manaswi Reddy, Baskaran Chandrasekaran, Arun G Maiya, Chythra R Rao","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged sitting can negatively impact postprandial glucose levels and cognitive functions. Stair climbing interventions have potential to mitigate these risks however remains unexplored. The present study aimed to explore the effects of stair climbing bouts on postprandial glucose and cognitive functions during prolonged sitting. Twenty-eight sedentary young adults (aged 20 - 30 years) underwent two intervention visits after standardized lunch for two hours: (1) STAIR: the participants climbed two flight of stairs for two minutes every 30 minutes; (2) SIT: the participants continued to sit. Blood glucose was measured using capillary finger prick method while attention function was measured using computer-based cognitive tests at baseline, end of 1st hour and 2nd hour. Significant interaction (F<sub>2, 54</sub> = 15.96, p <0.001) was observed for conditions and time. During STAIR visit, significant changes in postprandial glucose at 1<sup>st</sup> hour (β = - 2.6 mmol/dl, p <0.001) and 2<sup>nd</sup> hour (β = 3.0 mmol/dl, p <0.001). No significant difference in the attention functions with time and conditions was observed. Stair climbing interruptions may be a promising solution to prevent high glycemic excursion occurring during prolonged sitting following postprandial sessions. However, the clinical benefits of stair climbing on attention functions remain unconvinced.</p>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"114726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stair climbing interventions reduce postprandial hyperglycemia but not cognitive functions: findings of a randomized cross-over trial.\",\"authors\":\"Eswaran Tpm Thirunavukarasu, Manaswi Reddy, Baskaran Chandrasekaran, Arun G Maiya, Chythra R Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prolonged sitting can negatively impact postprandial glucose levels and cognitive functions. Stair climbing interventions have potential to mitigate these risks however remains unexplored. The present study aimed to explore the effects of stair climbing bouts on postprandial glucose and cognitive functions during prolonged sitting. Twenty-eight sedentary young adults (aged 20 - 30 years) underwent two intervention visits after standardized lunch for two hours: (1) STAIR: the participants climbed two flight of stairs for two minutes every 30 minutes; (2) SIT: the participants continued to sit. Blood glucose was measured using capillary finger prick method while attention function was measured using computer-based cognitive tests at baseline, end of 1st hour and 2nd hour. Significant interaction (F<sub>2, 54</sub> = 15.96, p <0.001) was observed for conditions and time. During STAIR visit, significant changes in postprandial glucose at 1<sup>st</sup> hour (β = - 2.6 mmol/dl, p <0.001) and 2<sup>nd</sup> hour (β = 3.0 mmol/dl, p <0.001). No significant difference in the attention functions with time and conditions was observed. Stair climbing interruptions may be a promising solution to prevent high glycemic excursion occurring during prolonged sitting following postprandial sessions. However, the clinical benefits of stair climbing on attention functions remain unconvinced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"114726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

久坐会对餐后血糖水平和认知功能产生负面影响。爬楼梯干预措施具有减轻这些风险的潜力,但仍有待探索。本研究旨在探讨长时间坐着时爬楼梯对餐后血糖和认知功能的影响。28 名久坐不动的年轻人(20 - 30 岁)在标准午餐后接受了两个小时的干预访问:(1)STAIR:参与者每 30 分钟爬两层楼梯两分钟;(2)SIT:参与者继续坐着。在基线、第 1 小时结束和第 2 小时时,采用毛细血管指刺法测量血糖,并使用基于计算机的认知测试测量注意力功能。显著的交互作用(F2,54 = 15.96,P 第 1 小时(β = - 2.6 mmol/dl,P 第 2 小时(β = 3.0 mmol/dl,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stair climbing interventions reduce postprandial hyperglycemia but not cognitive functions: findings of a randomized cross-over trial.

Prolonged sitting can negatively impact postprandial glucose levels and cognitive functions. Stair climbing interventions have potential to mitigate these risks however remains unexplored. The present study aimed to explore the effects of stair climbing bouts on postprandial glucose and cognitive functions during prolonged sitting. Twenty-eight sedentary young adults (aged 20 - 30 years) underwent two intervention visits after standardized lunch for two hours: (1) STAIR: the participants climbed two flight of stairs for two minutes every 30 minutes; (2) SIT: the participants continued to sit. Blood glucose was measured using capillary finger prick method while attention function was measured using computer-based cognitive tests at baseline, end of 1st hour and 2nd hour. Significant interaction (F2, 54 = 15.96, p <0.001) was observed for conditions and time. During STAIR visit, significant changes in postprandial glucose at 1st hour (β = - 2.6 mmol/dl, p <0.001) and 2nd hour (β = 3.0 mmol/dl, p <0.001). No significant difference in the attention functions with time and conditions was observed. Stair climbing interruptions may be a promising solution to prevent high glycemic excursion occurring during prolonged sitting following postprandial sessions. However, the clinical benefits of stair climbing on attention functions remain unconvinced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to ‘Deep learning dives: Predicting anxiety in Zebrafish through novel tank assay analysis’ Physiology & Behavior (2024), 114696 The effect of blue light on cognitive function at workplaces: A systematic review Editorial Board Network structure of sleep quality and its bridging association with anhedonia in adolescent major depression disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1