Qian Yu, Amar Mahbubani, Daniel Kwak, Chih-Yi Liao, Anjana Pillai, Mikin Patel, Rakesh Navuluri, Brian Funaki, Osman Ahmed
{"title":"SEER 数据库中射频消融治疗肝内胆管癌的生存结果:与放疗和切除术的比较。","authors":"Qian Yu, Amar Mahbubani, Daniel Kwak, Chih-Yi Liao, Anjana Pillai, Mikin Patel, Rakesh Navuluri, Brian Funaki, Osman Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n=2653) or external beam radiotherapy (n=1068) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ablation group, atients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than the 2000-2009 subgroup (mOS 32 versus 21 months, HR: 0.50 [95%CI: 0.33-0.75], p=0.001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3cm versus >3cm, p=0.049) and tumor stage (p<0.001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95%CI: 74.8-88.4%), 43.5% (95%CI: 33.5-53.1%), and 23.7% (95%CI: 15.3-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS: 87.8% [95%CI: 78.6-93.3%]) demonstrated improved OS than regional (1-year OS: 81.3% [95%CI: 52.5-93.5%]) and distant disease (50.2% [95%CI: 34.0-78.8%], p<0.001). For tumors ≤3cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (p=0.561), although both were better than radiotherapy (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survival of iCCA patients who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered as front line compared to radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from the SEER Database: Comparison with Radiotherapy and Resection.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Yu, Amar Mahbubani, Daniel Kwak, Chih-Yi Liao, Anjana Pillai, Mikin Patel, Rakesh Navuluri, Brian Funaki, Osman Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n=2653) or external beam radiotherapy (n=1068) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ablation group, atients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than the 2000-2009 subgroup (mOS 32 versus 21 months, HR: 0.50 [95%CI: 0.33-0.75], p=0.001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3cm versus >3cm, p=0.049) and tumor stage (p<0.001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95%CI: 74.8-88.4%), 43.5% (95%CI: 33.5-53.1%), and 23.7% (95%CI: 15.3-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS: 87.8% [95%CI: 78.6-93.3%]) demonstrated improved OS than regional (1-year OS: 81.3% [95%CI: 52.5-93.5%]) and distant disease (50.2% [95%CI: 34.0-78.8%], p<0.001). For tumors ≤3cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (p=0.561), although both were better than radiotherapy (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survival of iCCA patients who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered as front line compared to radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from the SEER Database: Comparison with Radiotherapy and Resection.
Purpose: To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.
Materials and methods: Data was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n=2653) or external beam radiotherapy (n=1068) were performed.
Results: In the ablation group, atients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than the 2000-2009 subgroup (mOS 32 versus 21 months, HR: 0.50 [95%CI: 0.33-0.75], p=0.001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3cm versus >3cm, p=0.049) and tumor stage (p<0.001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95%CI: 74.8-88.4%), 43.5% (95%CI: 33.5-53.1%), and 23.7% (95%CI: 15.3-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS: 87.8% [95%CI: 78.6-93.3%]) demonstrated improved OS than regional (1-year OS: 81.3% [95%CI: 52.5-93.5%]) and distant disease (50.2% [95%CI: 34.0-78.8%], p<0.001). For tumors ≤3cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (p=0.561), although both were better than radiotherapy (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: Survival of iCCA patients who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered as front line compared to radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.
期刊介绍:
JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.