SEER 数据库中射频消融治疗肝内胆管癌的生存结果:与放疗和切除术的比较。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028
Qian Yu, Amar Mahbubani, Daniel Kwak, Chih-Yi Liao, Anjana Pillai, Mikin Patel, Rakesh Navuluri, Brian Funaki, Osman Ahmed
{"title":"SEER 数据库中射频消融治疗肝内胆管癌的生存结果:与放疗和切除术的比较。","authors":"Qian Yu, Amar Mahbubani, Daniel Kwak, Chih-Yi Liao, Anjana Pillai, Mikin Patel, Rakesh Navuluri, Brian Funaki, Osman Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n=2653) or external beam radiotherapy (n=1068) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ablation group, atients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than the 2000-2009 subgroup (mOS 32 versus 21 months, HR: 0.50 [95%CI: 0.33-0.75], p=0.001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3cm versus >3cm, p=0.049) and tumor stage (p<0.001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95%CI: 74.8-88.4%), 43.5% (95%CI: 33.5-53.1%), and 23.7% (95%CI: 15.3-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS: 87.8% [95%CI: 78.6-93.3%]) demonstrated improved OS than regional (1-year OS: 81.3% [95%CI: 52.5-93.5%]) and distant disease (50.2% [95%CI: 34.0-78.8%], p<0.001). For tumors ≤3cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (p=0.561), although both were better than radiotherapy (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survival of iCCA patients who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered as front line compared to radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from the SEER Database: Comparison with Radiotherapy and Resection.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Yu, Amar Mahbubani, Daniel Kwak, Chih-Yi Liao, Anjana Pillai, Mikin Patel, Rakesh Navuluri, Brian Funaki, Osman Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n=2653) or external beam radiotherapy (n=1068) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ablation group, atients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than the 2000-2009 subgroup (mOS 32 versus 21 months, HR: 0.50 [95%CI: 0.33-0.75], p=0.001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3cm versus >3cm, p=0.049) and tumor stage (p<0.001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95%CI: 74.8-88.4%), 43.5% (95%CI: 33.5-53.1%), and 23.7% (95%CI: 15.3-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS: 87.8% [95%CI: 78.6-93.3%]) demonstrated improved OS than regional (1-year OS: 81.3% [95%CI: 52.5-93.5%]) and distant disease (50.2% [95%CI: 34.0-78.8%], p<0.001). For tumors ≤3cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (p=0.561), although both were better than radiotherapy (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survival of iCCA patients who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered as front line compared to radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.10.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用基于人群的数据库确定射频消融治疗肝内胆管癌(iCCA)的有效性:从 2000 年至 2020 年的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中提取数据,其中包括 194 名接受消融术治疗的 iCCA 患者。检索了患者的人口统计学特征、总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)。评估了与生存相关的因素。对消融术与手术切除术(n=2653)或体外放射治疗(n=1068)进行了比较:在消融组中,2010年后确诊并接受治疗的患者的OS比2000-2009年亚组的患者更高(mOS分别为32个月和21个月,HR:0.50 [95%CI:0.33-0.75],P=0.001)。与OS相关的其他因素包括肿瘤大小(≤3厘米对>3厘米,P=0.049)和肿瘤分期(P结论:在过去10年中,接受热消融术的iCCA患者的生存率有所提高。对于≤3厘米的肿瘤,消融术与切除术一样有效,但要仔细选择患者,在某些患者群体中,消融术可被视为放疗的前线。根据肿瘤大小和疾病分期选择患者可提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survival Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from the SEER Database: Comparison with Radiotherapy and Resection.

Purpose: To determine effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) using a population-based database.

Materials and methods: Data was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2020 to include 194 patients who underwent ablation for iCCA. Patient demographics, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were retrieved. Factors associated with survival were evaluated. Comparison between ablation and surgical resection (n=2653) or external beam radiotherapy (n=1068) were performed.

Results: In the ablation group, atients diagnosed and treated after 2010 demonstrated improved OS than the 2000-2009 subgroup (mOS 32 versus 21 months, HR: 0.50 [95%CI: 0.33-0.75], p=0.001). Additional factors associated with OS included tumor size (≤3cm versus >3cm, p=0.049) and tumor stage (p<0.001). For patients diagnosed after 2010, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 82.8% (95%CI: 74.8-88.4%), 43.5% (95%CI: 33.5-53.1%), and 23.7% (95%CI: 15.3-33.5%), respectively. Patients with local disease (1-year OS: 87.8% [95%CI: 78.6-93.3%]) demonstrated improved OS than regional (1-year OS: 81.3% [95%CI: 52.5-93.5%]) and distant disease (50.2% [95%CI: 34.0-78.8%], p<0.001). For tumors ≤3cm, ablation and surgical resection offered comparable survival benefits (p=0.561), although both were better than radiotherapy (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Survival of iCCA patients who underwent thermal ablation has improved over the last 10 years. For tumors ≤3cm, ablation could be as effective as resection with careful candidate selection, and may be considered as front line compared to radiotherapy in certain patient populations. Patient selection based on tumor size and disease stage could improve survival outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
942
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.
期刊最新文献
Risks of Aliquot Delivery of Conformable Embolic Material: Embolic Dislodgement Resulting in Non-target Embolization. A Decade Long Analysis of Healthcare Disparities and Uterine Artery Embolization: An Exploration of Social Determinants of Health. Attrition Rates in Interventional Radiology Integrated Residency Programs. Combining Radioembolization and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Quest for Synergy. Percutaneous Anterograde Varicocele Embolisation: Technique and Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1