探索腹部整形手术中预康复和康复的使用、结果、障碍和促进因素:范围界定综述。

{"title":"探索腹部整形手术中预康复和康复的使用、结果、障碍和促进因素:范围界定综述。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review aimed to map the literature on prehabilitation and rehabilitation in adults undergoing abdominoplasty, identifying gaps and areas for future research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review followed the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews and was registered on the Open Science Framework platform (<span><span>https://osf.io/m4k5s</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). The search for studies was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, LILACS, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. The search strategy used the PCC approach: P: abdominoplasty surgery; C: prehabilitation or rehabilitation interventions; C: patient-related outcomes, hospital outcomes, safety outcomes, mortality, intervention description, feasibility of intervention selection and delivery, reported barriers and facilitators, and various study designs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 2444 references examined, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, predominantly consisting of small clinical trials. The most frequent surgical approach was combined abdominoplasty, present in 58.3% of the studies. Physiotherapists integrated with the prehabilitation and/or rehabilitation team in 33.3% of cases. Notably, 75% of the studies focused on postoperative rehabilitation, with lymphatic drainage techniques being the most common intervention, appearing in 41.7% of the studies. 33.3% of the studies mentioned respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure as postoperative occurrences. Some gaps were identified, including insufficiently detailed reports of interventions and diversity in the type and timing of outcome measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review highlights the lack of data on the effects of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing abdominoplasty, due to the diversity of measures and variable assessment times, emphasizing the need for standardization and multicenter studies to determine optimal interventions and their impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the use, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in abdominoplasty surgeries: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review aimed to map the literature on prehabilitation and rehabilitation in adults undergoing abdominoplasty, identifying gaps and areas for future research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review followed the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews and was registered on the Open Science Framework platform (<span><span>https://osf.io/m4k5s</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). The search for studies was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, LILACS, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. The search strategy used the PCC approach: P: abdominoplasty surgery; C: prehabilitation or rehabilitation interventions; C: patient-related outcomes, hospital outcomes, safety outcomes, mortality, intervention description, feasibility of intervention selection and delivery, reported barriers and facilitators, and various study designs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 2444 references examined, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, predominantly consisting of small clinical trials. The most frequent surgical approach was combined abdominoplasty, present in 58.3% of the studies. Physiotherapists integrated with the prehabilitation and/or rehabilitation team in 33.3% of cases. Notably, 75% of the studies focused on postoperative rehabilitation, with lymphatic drainage techniques being the most common intervention, appearing in 41.7% of the studies. 33.3% of the studies mentioned respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure as postoperative occurrences. Some gaps were identified, including insufficiently detailed reports of interventions and diversity in the type and timing of outcome measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review highlights the lack of data on the effects of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing abdominoplasty, due to the diversity of measures and variable assessment times, emphasizing the need for standardization and multicenter studies to determine optimal interventions and their impacts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005813\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本综述旨在梳理有关成人腹部整形术前康复和康复的文献,找出差距和未来研究领域:本综述遵循《范围界定综述 PRISMA 指南》,并在开放科学框架平台 (https://osf.io/m4k5s) 上注册。研究检索在以下电子数据库中进行:PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Science、PEDro、LILACS、The Cochrane Library 和 CINAHL。搜索策略采用 PCC 方法:P:腹部整形手术;C:康复前或康复干预;C:患者相关结果、医院结果、安全结果、死亡率、干预描述、干预选择和实施的可行性、报告的障碍和促进因素以及各种研究设计:在2444篇参考文献中,有12篇符合纳入标准,主要是小型临床试验。最常见的手术方法是腹部联合整形术,占研究总数的 58.3%。物理治疗师与康复前和/或康复团队相结合的案例占 33.3%。值得注意的是,75%的研究侧重于术后康复,其中淋巴引流技术是最常见的干预措施,出现在41.7%的研究中。33.3%的研究提到术后会出现呼吸系统并发症,如肺不张、肺炎和呼吸衰竭。研究还发现了一些不足之处,包括干预措施的报告不够详细以及结果测量的类型和时间的多样性:本综述强调,由于测量方法的多样性和评估时间的不确定性,腹部整形术患者术前康复和康复效果方面缺乏数据,因此需要进行标准化和多中心研究,以确定最佳干预措施及其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the use, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in abdominoplasty surgeries: A scoping review

Objective

This review aimed to map the literature on prehabilitation and rehabilitation in adults undergoing abdominoplasty, identifying gaps and areas for future research.

Methods

The review followed the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews and was registered on the Open Science Framework platform (https://osf.io/m4k5s). The search for studies was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, LILACS, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. The search strategy used the PCC approach: P: abdominoplasty surgery; C: prehabilitation or rehabilitation interventions; C: patient-related outcomes, hospital outcomes, safety outcomes, mortality, intervention description, feasibility of intervention selection and delivery, reported barriers and facilitators, and various study designs.

Results

Among the 2444 references examined, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, predominantly consisting of small clinical trials. The most frequent surgical approach was combined abdominoplasty, present in 58.3% of the studies. Physiotherapists integrated with the prehabilitation and/or rehabilitation team in 33.3% of cases. Notably, 75% of the studies focused on postoperative rehabilitation, with lymphatic drainage techniques being the most common intervention, appearing in 41.7% of the studies. 33.3% of the studies mentioned respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure as postoperative occurrences. Some gaps were identified, including insufficiently detailed reports of interventions and diversity in the type and timing of outcome measurements.

Conclusions

This review highlights the lack of data on the effects of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing abdominoplasty, due to the diversity of measures and variable assessment times, emphasizing the need for standardization and multicenter studies to determine optimal interventions and their impacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The impact of cosmetic tourism across one year on an NHS breast surgery unit The roles of extracranial intravascular lesion, vasodilation-induced neural entrapment, and arteriolysis in migraine treatment Nail reconstruction using an osteo-onychocutaneous flap with the dorsal digital artery of the hallux as the pedicle: Techniques and anatomical insights Reduction mammaplasty relieves depression in women with macromastia: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1