Emily Alpert, Joanne N Wood, Justine Shults, Daniel M Lindberg, Kristine A Campbell, Aashim Bhatia, James D Anderst, Angela Bachim, Rachel P Berger, Farah W Brink, Lori D Frasier, Nancy Harper, Natalie Laub, John Melville, Jan Leonard, M Katherine Henry
{"title":"在护理因虐待而接受亚专科评估的婴儿时使用神经影像学的差异:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Emily Alpert, Joanne N Wood, Justine Shults, Daniel M Lindberg, Kristine A Campbell, Aashim Bhatia, James D Anderst, Angela Bachim, Rachel P Berger, Farah W Brink, Lori D Frasier, Nancy Harper, Natalie Laub, John Melville, Jan Leonard, M Katherine Henry","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To quantify hospital-level variation in use of neuroimaging to screen for intracranial injury (ICI) among infants without overt signs or symptoms of head trauma undergoing subspecialty evaluations for physical abuse; (2) to assess for disproportionality in neuroimaging based on race/ethnicity and insurance type.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of infants age <12 months receiving subspecialty child abuse evaluations from 02/2021 - 12/2022 at 10 sites in CAPNET, a multicenter child abuse research network. Infants were included if they underwent a skeletal survey and lacked overt signs of possible ICI or blunt head injury. Outcome was completion of neuroimaging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between demographic, clinical, and hospital factors with neuroimaging use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,114 infants, 746 (67%) underwent neuroimaging ranging from 51% to 80% across CAPNET hospitals. In multivariable analysis, young age, presence of rib fracture(s), and site had significant associations with neuroimaging. Insurance type and race/ethnicity did not contribute significantly to the model. After adjustment for case-mix, there was significant variation across hospitals, with neuroimaging use ranging from 51% (95% CI: 43%, 59%) to 79% (95% CI 71%, 88%) CONCLUSION: We identified significant variation in neuroimaging use across CAPNET hospitals, highlighting the need for guideline development and care standardization during the care of infants undergoing abuse evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in use of neuroimaging in the care of infants undergoing subspecialty evaluations for abuse: A multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Alpert, Joanne N Wood, Justine Shults, Daniel M Lindberg, Kristine A Campbell, Aashim Bhatia, James D Anderst, Angela Bachim, Rachel P Berger, Farah W Brink, Lori D Frasier, Nancy Harper, Natalie Laub, John Melville, Jan Leonard, M Katherine Henry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To quantify hospital-level variation in use of neuroimaging to screen for intracranial injury (ICI) among infants without overt signs or symptoms of head trauma undergoing subspecialty evaluations for physical abuse; (2) to assess for disproportionality in neuroimaging based on race/ethnicity and insurance type.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of infants age <12 months receiving subspecialty child abuse evaluations from 02/2021 - 12/2022 at 10 sites in CAPNET, a multicenter child abuse research network. Infants were included if they underwent a skeletal survey and lacked overt signs of possible ICI or blunt head injury. Outcome was completion of neuroimaging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between demographic, clinical, and hospital factors with neuroimaging use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,114 infants, 746 (67%) underwent neuroimaging ranging from 51% to 80% across CAPNET hospitals. In multivariable analysis, young age, presence of rib fracture(s), and site had significant associations with neuroimaging. Insurance type and race/ethnicity did not contribute significantly to the model. After adjustment for case-mix, there was significant variation across hospitals, with neuroimaging use ranging from 51% (95% CI: 43%, 59%) to 79% (95% CI 71%, 88%) CONCLUSION: We identified significant variation in neuroimaging use across CAPNET hospitals, highlighting the need for guideline development and care standardization during the care of infants undergoing abuse evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.10.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.10.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variation in use of neuroimaging in the care of infants undergoing subspecialty evaluations for abuse: A multicenter study.
Objectives: (1) To quantify hospital-level variation in use of neuroimaging to screen for intracranial injury (ICI) among infants without overt signs or symptoms of head trauma undergoing subspecialty evaluations for physical abuse; (2) to assess for disproportionality in neuroimaging based on race/ethnicity and insurance type.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of infants age <12 months receiving subspecialty child abuse evaluations from 02/2021 - 12/2022 at 10 sites in CAPNET, a multicenter child abuse research network. Infants were included if they underwent a skeletal survey and lacked overt signs of possible ICI or blunt head injury. Outcome was completion of neuroimaging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between demographic, clinical, and hospital factors with neuroimaging use.
Results: Of 1,114 infants, 746 (67%) underwent neuroimaging ranging from 51% to 80% across CAPNET hospitals. In multivariable analysis, young age, presence of rib fracture(s), and site had significant associations with neuroimaging. Insurance type and race/ethnicity did not contribute significantly to the model. After adjustment for case-mix, there was significant variation across hospitals, with neuroimaging use ranging from 51% (95% CI: 43%, 59%) to 79% (95% CI 71%, 88%) CONCLUSION: We identified significant variation in neuroimaging use across CAPNET hospitals, highlighting the need for guideline development and care standardization during the care of infants undergoing abuse evaluations.
期刊介绍:
Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.