关于全髋关节置换术后使用限制和辅助设备的建议:指南修订版。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2412185
Alessandra Ruspi, Davide De Leo, Francesco Scandelli, Valeria Tosetto, Silvia Dosella, Lorenzo Di Mento, Massimo De Donato, Cristiano Sconza, Francesco Rosa, Berardo Di Matteo, Federico Della Rocca, Elena Azzolini, Guido Grappiolo, Holger Schünemann, Roberto Gatti
{"title":"关于全髋关节置换术后使用限制和辅助设备的建议:指南修订版。","authors":"Alessandra Ruspi, Davide De Leo, Francesco Scandelli, Valeria Tosetto, Silvia Dosella, Lorenzo Di Mento, Massimo De Donato, Cristiano Sconza, Francesco Rosa, Berardo Di Matteo, Federico Della Rocca, Elena Azzolini, Guido Grappiolo, Holger Schünemann, Roberto Gatti","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2412185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Movement restrictions and assistive devices have traditionally been recommended to prevent hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Considering the advancements in THA surgery, a review of treatment recommendations is worthwhile. The aim of this study was to investigate whether unrestricted protocol (without movement restrictions and assistive devices) should be recommended for THA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiprofessional panel used the GRADE-Adolopment to develop the present recommendations, following the GIN-McMaster-Guideline-Development-Tool. We selected guideline topic and target audience, formulated clinical questions and prioritised outcomes. For the first question, a source guideline was identified and adoloped, whereas the second question required a de-novo recommendation. Therefore, the GRADE-Evidence-Profile and the Evidence-to-Decision framework were completed. Finally, the panel discussed and formulated the final recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hip dislocation was defined as critical outcome. No between-groups differences in the early dislocation rates were found: without movement restrictions, 1623 patients, RR 0.44 (CI<sub>95</sub> 0.16-1.20); without assistive devices, 4426 patients, RR 0.75 (CI<sub>95</sub> 0.52-1.08). Finally, considering small desirable health effects and trivial undesirable health effects of the intervention, we integrated two \"conditional-recommendations\" in favour of an unrestricted protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through GRADE-adolopment approach new recommendations to provide an evidence-based guidance after THA have been formulated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations on the use of restrictions and assistive devices after total hip arthroplasty: an adolopment of guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Ruspi, Davide De Leo, Francesco Scandelli, Valeria Tosetto, Silvia Dosella, Lorenzo Di Mento, Massimo De Donato, Cristiano Sconza, Francesco Rosa, Berardo Di Matteo, Federico Della Rocca, Elena Azzolini, Guido Grappiolo, Holger Schünemann, Roberto Gatti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2024.2412185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Movement restrictions and assistive devices have traditionally been recommended to prevent hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Considering the advancements in THA surgery, a review of treatment recommendations is worthwhile. The aim of this study was to investigate whether unrestricted protocol (without movement restrictions and assistive devices) should be recommended for THA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiprofessional panel used the GRADE-Adolopment to develop the present recommendations, following the GIN-McMaster-Guideline-Development-Tool. We selected guideline topic and target audience, formulated clinical questions and prioritised outcomes. For the first question, a source guideline was identified and adoloped, whereas the second question required a de-novo recommendation. Therefore, the GRADE-Evidence-Profile and the Evidence-to-Decision framework were completed. Finally, the panel discussed and formulated the final recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hip dislocation was defined as critical outcome. No between-groups differences in the early dislocation rates were found: without movement restrictions, 1623 patients, RR 0.44 (CI<sub>95</sub> 0.16-1.20); without assistive devices, 4426 patients, RR 0.75 (CI<sub>95</sub> 0.52-1.08). Finally, considering small desirable health effects and trivial undesirable health effects of the intervention, we integrated two \\\"conditional-recommendations\\\" in favour of an unrestricted protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through GRADE-adolopment approach new recommendations to provide an evidence-based guidance after THA have been formulated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2412185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2412185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为预防全髋关节置换术(THA)后髋关节脱位,传统上建议采用活动限制和辅助装置。考虑到全髋关节置换手术的进步,对治疗建议进行回顾是值得的。本研究的目的是探讨是否应向全髋关节置换术患者推荐无限制方案(无运动限制和辅助设备):方法:一个多专业小组按照 GIN-McMaster 指南制定工具,使用 GRADE-Adolopment 制定了本建议。我们选择了指南主题和目标受众,提出了临床问题,并对结果进行了优先排序。对于第一个问题,我们确定并补充了源指南,而第二个问题则需要重新提出建议。因此,完成了 GRADE-证据档案和 "从证据到决定 "框架。最后,专家组讨论并制定了最终建议:髋关节脱位被定义为关键结果。在早期脱位率方面未发现组间差异:无运动限制,1623 例患者,RR 0.44(CI95 0.16-1.20);无辅助设备,4426 例患者,RR 0.75(CI95 0.52-1.08)。最后,考虑到干预措施对健康的理想影响较小,而对健康的不良影响较小,我们整合了两个 "有条件的建议",赞成采用非限制性方案:结论:通过GRADE-adolopment方法,我们提出了新的建议,为THA术后提供循证指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations on the use of restrictions and assistive devices after total hip arthroplasty: an adolopment of guidelines.

Purpose: Movement restrictions and assistive devices have traditionally been recommended to prevent hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Considering the advancements in THA surgery, a review of treatment recommendations is worthwhile. The aim of this study was to investigate whether unrestricted protocol (without movement restrictions and assistive devices) should be recommended for THA patients.

Methods: A multiprofessional panel used the GRADE-Adolopment to develop the present recommendations, following the GIN-McMaster-Guideline-Development-Tool. We selected guideline topic and target audience, formulated clinical questions and prioritised outcomes. For the first question, a source guideline was identified and adoloped, whereas the second question required a de-novo recommendation. Therefore, the GRADE-Evidence-Profile and the Evidence-to-Decision framework were completed. Finally, the panel discussed and formulated the final recommendations.

Results: Hip dislocation was defined as critical outcome. No between-groups differences in the early dislocation rates were found: without movement restrictions, 1623 patients, RR 0.44 (CI95 0.16-1.20); without assistive devices, 4426 patients, RR 0.75 (CI95 0.52-1.08). Finally, considering small desirable health effects and trivial undesirable health effects of the intervention, we integrated two "conditional-recommendations" in favour of an unrestricted protocol.

Conclusion: Through GRADE-adolopment approach new recommendations to provide an evidence-based guidance after THA have been formulated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"More than effort, it's dedicating time and perseverance." experiences of physical activity and physical exercise in stroke survivor with high functional capacity: a qualitative study. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Exploring perspectives on implementing the World Health Assembly's Resolution for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Switzerland: a representative rehabilitation stakeholder survey. The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1