通过优化保险预授权减少放射肿瘤学患者护理的延误:通过优化保险预授权减少放射肿瘤科患者护理延误

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Practical Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.002
Maxwell Tran, Bhisham Chera, Kevin Shrake, Bradley Depaoli, Edward Duffy Iii, Michael Hall, Justin Steinman, Stephanie Myers, Osagie Igiebor, Jay Callahan, Daniel McDonald, Jennifer Harper, Samuel Lewis Cooper
{"title":"通过优化保险预授权减少放射肿瘤学患者护理的延误:通过优化保险预授权减少放射肿瘤科患者护理延误","authors":"Maxwell Tran, Bhisham Chera, Kevin Shrake, Bradley Depaoli, Edward Duffy Iii, Michael Hall, Justin Steinman, Stephanie Myers, Osagie Igiebor, Jay Callahan, Daniel McDonald, Jennifer Harper, Samuel Lewis Cooper","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>Difficulties and delays in insurance pre-authorization (pre-auth) can negatively impact patient care, resulting in postponing, modifying, or even cancelling radiation therapy for patients. We aimed to perform a root cause analysis for pre-auth delays in our department and implement solutions to optimize our workflow. Our primary objectives were to decrease mean time for clinical treatment plan (CTP) completion, and for number of cases delayed/denied, by 50% each.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>We performed a root cause analysis for pre-auth delays, and used the PDSA & A3 quality improvement methods. We sampled ∼2 cases per disease site (19 cases from July - Aug 2022) to determine the baseline. Countermeasures included: 1) optimizing our CTP templates per disease site to contain the specific clinical information required for pre-auth, 2) formalizing earlier completion of CTPs in our Care Path®, and 3) formalizing the pre auth workflow in our Care Path®. We tracked various metrics, including mean time for CTP completion, % usage of our Care Path®, % usage of revised CTP templates, mean time until pre-auth initiated & completed, and % of cases delayed/denied. Two-tailed T-tests and Chi-squared tests were used to generate p-values comparing mean values and percentages, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>495 patients completed CT simulation in our department between October 2022 and February 2023. Mean time for CTP completion (Day 0 = day of CT simulation scheduling) improved from 16 days at baseline to 4 days (p<0.001). Care Path® usage improved from 16% to 97% (p<0.001), as did usage of our revised CTP templates, from 0% to 97% (p<0.001). The mean time from insurance pre-auth initiation to completion improved from 5 days to 1 day. The percent of cases that were delayed/denied was reduced significantly from 32% to 8% (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving timeliness and details of CTP documentation and pre-auth by using our Care Path® and optimizing CTP templates improved efficiency of insurance pre-auth completion and reduced the number of cases delayed/denied.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Patient Care Delays in Radiation Oncology Via Optimization of Insurance Pre-Authorization: Reducing Delays via Optimization of Pre-Auth.\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell Tran, Bhisham Chera, Kevin Shrake, Bradley Depaoli, Edward Duffy Iii, Michael Hall, Justin Steinman, Stephanie Myers, Osagie Igiebor, Jay Callahan, Daniel McDonald, Jennifer Harper, Samuel Lewis Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>Difficulties and delays in insurance pre-authorization (pre-auth) can negatively impact patient care, resulting in postponing, modifying, or even cancelling radiation therapy for patients. We aimed to perform a root cause analysis for pre-auth delays in our department and implement solutions to optimize our workflow. Our primary objectives were to decrease mean time for clinical treatment plan (CTP) completion, and for number of cases delayed/denied, by 50% each.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>We performed a root cause analysis for pre-auth delays, and used the PDSA & A3 quality improvement methods. We sampled ∼2 cases per disease site (19 cases from July - Aug 2022) to determine the baseline. Countermeasures included: 1) optimizing our CTP templates per disease site to contain the specific clinical information required for pre-auth, 2) formalizing earlier completion of CTPs in our Care Path®, and 3) formalizing the pre auth workflow in our Care Path®. We tracked various metrics, including mean time for CTP completion, % usage of our Care Path®, % usage of revised CTP templates, mean time until pre-auth initiated & completed, and % of cases delayed/denied. Two-tailed T-tests and Chi-squared tests were used to generate p-values comparing mean values and percentages, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>495 patients completed CT simulation in our department between October 2022 and February 2023. Mean time for CTP completion (Day 0 = day of CT simulation scheduling) improved from 16 days at baseline to 4 days (p<0.001). Care Path® usage improved from 16% to 97% (p<0.001), as did usage of our revised CTP templates, from 0% to 97% (p<0.001). The mean time from insurance pre-auth initiation to completion improved from 5 days to 1 day. The percent of cases that were delayed/denied was reduced significantly from 32% to 8% (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving timeliness and details of CTP documentation and pre-auth by using our Care Path® and optimizing CTP templates improved efficiency of insurance pre-auth completion and reduced the number of cases delayed/denied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目标:保险预授权(pre-auth)的困难和延误会对患者护理产生负面影响,导致患者推迟、修改甚至取消放射治疗。我们旨在对本部门预授权延误的根本原因进行分析,并实施优化工作流程的解决方案。我们的主要目标是将完成临床治疗计划(CTP)的平均时间和延迟/拒绝病例的数量各减少 50%:我们采用 PDSA 和 A3 质量改进方法,对批准前延误进行了根本原因分析。我们在每个病区抽取了 2 个病例(2022 年 7 月至 8 月共 19 个病例),以确定基线。对策包括1)优化每个疾病部位的 CTP 模板,使其包含预认证所需的特定临床信息;2)在 Care Path® 中正式规定提前完成 CTP;3)在 Care Path® 中正式规定预认证工作流程。我们跟踪了各种指标,包括完成 CTP 的平均时间、Care Path® 的使用率、修订后的 CTP 模板的使用率、启动和完成预审的平均时间以及延迟/拒绝病例的百分比。双尾 T 检验和卡方检验分别用于比较平均值和百分比的 P 值:2022年10月至2023年2月期间,495名患者在我科完成了CT模拟。CTP完成的平均时间(第0天=CT模拟安排日)从基线时的16天缩短至4天(P结论:通过使用我们的 Care Path® 和优化 CTP 模板,改善了 CTP 文件和预审的及时性和细节,提高了保险预审的完成效率,减少了延迟/拒绝病例的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reducing Patient Care Delays in Radiation Oncology Via Optimization of Insurance Pre-Authorization: Reducing Delays via Optimization of Pre-Auth.

Purpose/objectives: Difficulties and delays in insurance pre-authorization (pre-auth) can negatively impact patient care, resulting in postponing, modifying, or even cancelling radiation therapy for patients. We aimed to perform a root cause analysis for pre-auth delays in our department and implement solutions to optimize our workflow. Our primary objectives were to decrease mean time for clinical treatment plan (CTP) completion, and for number of cases delayed/denied, by 50% each.

Materials/methods: We performed a root cause analysis for pre-auth delays, and used the PDSA & A3 quality improvement methods. We sampled ∼2 cases per disease site (19 cases from July - Aug 2022) to determine the baseline. Countermeasures included: 1) optimizing our CTP templates per disease site to contain the specific clinical information required for pre-auth, 2) formalizing earlier completion of CTPs in our Care Path®, and 3) formalizing the pre auth workflow in our Care Path®. We tracked various metrics, including mean time for CTP completion, % usage of our Care Path®, % usage of revised CTP templates, mean time until pre-auth initiated & completed, and % of cases delayed/denied. Two-tailed T-tests and Chi-squared tests were used to generate p-values comparing mean values and percentages, respectively.

Results: 495 patients completed CT simulation in our department between October 2022 and February 2023. Mean time for CTP completion (Day 0 = day of CT simulation scheduling) improved from 16 days at baseline to 4 days (p<0.001). Care Path® usage improved from 16% to 97% (p<0.001), as did usage of our revised CTP templates, from 0% to 97% (p<0.001). The mean time from insurance pre-auth initiation to completion improved from 5 days to 1 day. The percent of cases that were delayed/denied was reduced significantly from 32% to 8% (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Improving timeliness and details of CTP documentation and pre-auth by using our Care Path® and optimizing CTP templates improved efficiency of insurance pre-auth completion and reduced the number of cases delayed/denied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
期刊最新文献
Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Table of Contents Editorial Board Being an Oncologist—How I Evolved Order From Chaos: The Benefits of Standardized Nomenclature in Radiation Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1