将渗透过程纳入混合降尺度方法,估算地下土壤湿度

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102875
Mo Zhang , Yong Ge , Jianghao Wang
{"title":"将渗透过程纳入混合降尺度方法,估算地下土壤湿度","authors":"Mo Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong Ge ,&nbsp;Jianghao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil moisture is a key variable in the water, energy, and carbon cycles. Mapping sub-surface soil moisture with fine spatial resolution requires integrating downscaling approaches and process-based models. However, the effectiveness of hybrid methods, such as regression kriging (RK), in enhancing soil moisture estimates through process-based parameter predictions remains inconclusive. This study aims to integrate infiltration processes into downscaling models to predict 1-km multi-layer soil moisture, while comparing performance of nonlinear and linear models, and evaluating RK improvements. Random forests (RF) and generalized linear model (GLM) were used to downscale surface soil moisture (0–5 cm) from 36-km Soil Moisture Active Passive satellite products to 1 km across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Next, the soil moisture analytical relationship (SMAR) model was applied to simulate infiltration processes and obtain site-scale parameters. RK variants (RFRK and GLMRK) were applied to jointly predict the spatial distribution of multiple infiltration parameters, which were used in SMAR at 1-km grids to estimate sub-surface soil moisture (5–40 cm). The results showed that parameter calibration significantly enhanced sub-surface soil moisture simulation, reducing root mean square error (RMSE) by 61.2 % to 69.8 %, from 0.09 to 0.03. RF outperformed GLM across all depth intervals, providing higher prediction accuracy (average RMSE, RF: 0.07; GLM: 0.09). Moreover, RK enhanced the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (RFRK: 0.34; GLMRK: 0.28) and coefficient of determination (RFRK: 0.5; GLMRK: 0.38) by 7.7 %–13.3 % and 2.2 %–2.4 %. This study provides a reference for mapping multi-layer soil moisture through the integration of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches in regional-scale study areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating infiltration processes in hybrid downscaling methods to estimate sub-surface soil moisture\",\"authors\":\"Mo Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong Ge ,&nbsp;Jianghao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Soil moisture is a key variable in the water, energy, and carbon cycles. Mapping sub-surface soil moisture with fine spatial resolution requires integrating downscaling approaches and process-based models. However, the effectiveness of hybrid methods, such as regression kriging (RK), in enhancing soil moisture estimates through process-based parameter predictions remains inconclusive. This study aims to integrate infiltration processes into downscaling models to predict 1-km multi-layer soil moisture, while comparing performance of nonlinear and linear models, and evaluating RK improvements. Random forests (RF) and generalized linear model (GLM) were used to downscale surface soil moisture (0–5 cm) from 36-km Soil Moisture Active Passive satellite products to 1 km across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Next, the soil moisture analytical relationship (SMAR) model was applied to simulate infiltration processes and obtain site-scale parameters. RK variants (RFRK and GLMRK) were applied to jointly predict the spatial distribution of multiple infiltration parameters, which were used in SMAR at 1-km grids to estimate sub-surface soil moisture (5–40 cm). The results showed that parameter calibration significantly enhanced sub-surface soil moisture simulation, reducing root mean square error (RMSE) by 61.2 % to 69.8 %, from 0.09 to 0.03. RF outperformed GLM across all depth intervals, providing higher prediction accuracy (average RMSE, RF: 0.07; GLM: 0.09). Moreover, RK enhanced the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (RFRK: 0.34; GLMRK: 0.28) and coefficient of determination (RFRK: 0.5; GLMRK: 0.38) by 7.7 %–13.3 % and 2.2 %–2.4 %. This study provides a reference for mapping multi-layer soil moisture through the integration of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches in regional-scale study areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124004175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124004175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤水分是水、能量和碳循环中的一个关键变量。要绘制具有精细空间分辨率的地下土壤水分图,需要将降尺度方法与基于过程的模型相结合。然而,混合方法(如回归克里金法(RK))在通过基于过程的参数预测来提高土壤水分估计值方面的有效性仍无定论。本研究旨在将渗透过程纳入降尺度模型,以预测 1 千米多层土壤水分,同时比较非线性和线性模型的性能,并评估 RK 的改进。使用随机森林(RF)和广义线性模型(GLM)将青藏高原 36 公里土壤水分主动被动卫星产品的表层土壤水分(0-5 厘米)降尺至 1 公里。然后,应用土壤水分分析关系(SMAR)模型模拟入渗过程并获得站点尺度参数。应用 RK 变体(RFRK 和 GLMRK)联合预测多个入渗参数的空间分布,这些参数被用于 SMAR 的 1 千米网格,以估算地下土壤水分(5-40 厘米)。结果表明,参数校准显著增强了次表层土壤水分模拟,将均方根误差(RMSE)从 0.09 降至 0.03,降低了 61.2% 至 69.8%。在所有深度区间,RF 的表现都优于 GLM,预测精度更高(平均均方根误差,RF:0.07;GLM:0.09)。此外,RK 提高了纳什-苏特克利夫效率系数(RFRK:0.34;GLMRK:0.28)和决定系数(RFRK:0.5;GLMRK:0.38),分别为 7.7 %-13.3 % 和 2.2 %-2.4 %。这项研究为在区域尺度研究区域通过数据驱动和知识驱动相结合的方法绘制多层土壤水分图提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating infiltration processes in hybrid downscaling methods to estimate sub-surface soil moisture
Soil moisture is a key variable in the water, energy, and carbon cycles. Mapping sub-surface soil moisture with fine spatial resolution requires integrating downscaling approaches and process-based models. However, the effectiveness of hybrid methods, such as regression kriging (RK), in enhancing soil moisture estimates through process-based parameter predictions remains inconclusive. This study aims to integrate infiltration processes into downscaling models to predict 1-km multi-layer soil moisture, while comparing performance of nonlinear and linear models, and evaluating RK improvements. Random forests (RF) and generalized linear model (GLM) were used to downscale surface soil moisture (0–5 cm) from 36-km Soil Moisture Active Passive satellite products to 1 km across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Next, the soil moisture analytical relationship (SMAR) model was applied to simulate infiltration processes and obtain site-scale parameters. RK variants (RFRK and GLMRK) were applied to jointly predict the spatial distribution of multiple infiltration parameters, which were used in SMAR at 1-km grids to estimate sub-surface soil moisture (5–40 cm). The results showed that parameter calibration significantly enhanced sub-surface soil moisture simulation, reducing root mean square error (RMSE) by 61.2 % to 69.8 %, from 0.09 to 0.03. RF outperformed GLM across all depth intervals, providing higher prediction accuracy (average RMSE, RF: 0.07; GLM: 0.09). Moreover, RK enhanced the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (RFRK: 0.34; GLMRK: 0.28) and coefficient of determination (RFRK: 0.5; GLMRK: 0.38) by 7.7 %–13.3 % and 2.2 %–2.4 %. This study provides a reference for mapping multi-layer soil moisture through the integration of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches in regional-scale study areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
期刊最新文献
The retrospective double-entry of a long-term ecological dataset Integrating infiltration processes in hybrid downscaling methods to estimate sub-surface soil moisture A deep learning pipeline for time-lapse camera monitoring of insects and their floral environments A complete framework for hyperbolic acoustic localization with application to northern bobwhite covey calls Impacts of LULC changes on runoff from rivers through a coupled SWAT and BiLSTM model: A case study in Zhanghe River Basin, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1