使用 R6 对含有缺陷的光滑管道弯头进行结构完整性评估的指南

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105353
Yuebao Lei
{"title":"使用 R6 对含有缺陷的光滑管道弯头进行结构完整性评估的指南","authors":"Yuebao Lei","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, guidance for fracture assessment of defective elbows using the R6 failure assessment diagram (FAD) method has been included in R6 Revision 4 Amendment 13 (2023). This paper provides an overview of the new guidance and supporting validation. The guidance is validated using 75 cases of 3-D finite element (FE) elastic-plastic <em>J</em> results of smooth pipe elbows of various geometries with axial/circumferential internal/external semi-elliptical/extended/fully-circumferential surface cracks under internal pressure, in-plane/out-of-plane bending moment, torsion and various load combinations, by comparing the FE-based Option 3 failure assessment curves (FAC) with the R6 Option 2 FAC. The results show that, for 74 out of 75 cases, the FE-based Option 3 data points are above the R6 Option 2 FAC with reasonable conservatism when the guidance for evaluating the elbow stress intensity factor and limit load is followed. In other words, following the new guidance can lead to reasonably conservative assessment results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54946,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 105353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidance for structural integrity assessment of smooth pipe elbows containing defects using R6\",\"authors\":\"Yuebao Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recently, guidance for fracture assessment of defective elbows using the R6 failure assessment diagram (FAD) method has been included in R6 Revision 4 Amendment 13 (2023). This paper provides an overview of the new guidance and supporting validation. The guidance is validated using 75 cases of 3-D finite element (FE) elastic-plastic <em>J</em> results of smooth pipe elbows of various geometries with axial/circumferential internal/external semi-elliptical/extended/fully-circumferential surface cracks under internal pressure, in-plane/out-of-plane bending moment, torsion and various load combinations, by comparing the FE-based Option 3 failure assessment curves (FAC) with the R6 Option 2 FAC. The results show that, for 74 out of 75 cases, the FE-based Option 3 data points are above the R6 Option 2 FAC with reasonable conservatism when the guidance for evaluating the elbow stress intensity factor and limit load is followed. In other words, following the new guidance can lead to reasonably conservative assessment results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030801612400231X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030801612400231X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,使用 R6 失效评估图 (FAD) 方法对有缺陷的弯头进行断裂评估的指南已纳入 R6 修订版 4 第 13 修正案(2023 年)。本文概述了新指南和支持性验证。通过比较基于有限元的方案 3 失效评估曲线 (FAC) 和 R6 方案 2 失效评估曲线 (FAC),使用 75 个三维有限元 (FE) 弹性-塑性 J 结果验证了该指南,这些三维有限元 (FE) 结果是各种几何形状的光滑管道弯头在内部压力、平面内/平面外弯矩、扭转和各种载荷组合作用下出现轴向/环向内部/外部半椭圆形/延伸/全环形表面裂纹的结果。结果表明,在 75 个案例中,有 74 个案例的基于 FE 的方案 3 数据点高于 R6 方案 2 的 FAC,并且在评估肘部应力强度因子和极限载荷时遵循了合理的保守原则。换句话说,遵循新指南可以得到合理保守的评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guidance for structural integrity assessment of smooth pipe elbows containing defects using R6
Recently, guidance for fracture assessment of defective elbows using the R6 failure assessment diagram (FAD) method has been included in R6 Revision 4 Amendment 13 (2023). This paper provides an overview of the new guidance and supporting validation. The guidance is validated using 75 cases of 3-D finite element (FE) elastic-plastic J results of smooth pipe elbows of various geometries with axial/circumferential internal/external semi-elliptical/extended/fully-circumferential surface cracks under internal pressure, in-plane/out-of-plane bending moment, torsion and various load combinations, by comparing the FE-based Option 3 failure assessment curves (FAC) with the R6 Option 2 FAC. The results show that, for 74 out of 75 cases, the FE-based Option 3 data points are above the R6 Option 2 FAC with reasonable conservatism when the guidance for evaluating the elbow stress intensity factor and limit load is followed. In other words, following the new guidance can lead to reasonably conservative assessment results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
17 months
期刊介绍: Pressure vessel engineering technology is of importance in many branches of industry. This journal publishes the latest research results and related information on all its associated aspects, with particular emphasis on the structural integrity assessment, maintenance and life extension of pressurised process engineering plants. The anticipated coverage of the International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping ranges from simple mass-produced pressure vessels to large custom-built vessels and tanks. Pressure vessels technology is a developing field, and contributions on the following topics will therefore be welcome: • Pressure vessel engineering • Structural integrity assessment • Design methods • Codes and standards • Fabrication and welding • Materials properties requirements • Inspection and quality management • Maintenance and life extension • Ageing and environmental effects • Life management Of particular importance are papers covering aspects of significant practical application which could lead to major improvements in economy, reliability and useful life. While most accepted papers represent the results of original applied research, critical reviews of topical interest by world-leading experts will also appear from time to time. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping is indispensable reading for engineering professionals involved in the energy, petrochemicals, process plant, transport, aerospace and related industries; for manufacturers of pressure vessels and ancillary equipment; and for academics pursuing research in these areas.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced creep lifetime in P91 steel weldments via stabilizing tempered martensite structure Study on stress concentration and fatigue life of tubing with slip indentation Failure mechanisms of fusion-bonded reinforcement joints in reinforced thermoplastic pipes under uniaxial tensile conditions A comprehensive finite element framework for modeling of PEX-Al-PEX composite pipes Effects of different types of corrosion on seismic performance of circular hollow section T-joints subjected to coupling load
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1