{"title":"最小化多重依赖风险下的惩罚性目标达成概率","authors":"Ying Huang, Jun Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We consider a robust optimal investment and reinsurance problem with multiple dependent risks for an Ambiguity-Averse Insurer (AAI), who wishes to minimize the probability that the value of the wealth process reaches a low barrier before a high goal. We assume that the insurer can purchase per-loss reinsurance for every class of insurance business and invest its surplus in a risk-free asset and a risky asset. Using the technique of stochastic control theory and solving the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, we derive the robust optimal investment-reinsurance strategy and the associated value function. We conclude that the robust optimal investment-reinsurance strategy coincides with the one without model ambiguity, but the value function differs. We also illustrate our results by numerical examples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing the penalized goal-reaching probability with multiple dependent risks\",\"authors\":\"Ying Huang, Jun Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We consider a robust optimal investment and reinsurance problem with multiple dependent risks for an Ambiguity-Averse Insurer (AAI), who wishes to minimize the probability that the value of the wealth process reaches a low barrier before a high goal. We assume that the insurer can purchase per-loss reinsurance for every class of insurance business and invest its surplus in a risk-free asset and a risky asset. Using the technique of stochastic control theory and solving the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, we derive the robust optimal investment-reinsurance strategy and the associated value function. We conclude that the robust optimal investment-reinsurance strategy coincides with the one without model ambiguity, but the value function differs. We also illustrate our results by numerical examples.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224002566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224002566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimizing the penalized goal-reaching probability with multiple dependent risks
We consider a robust optimal investment and reinsurance problem with multiple dependent risks for an Ambiguity-Averse Insurer (AAI), who wishes to minimize the probability that the value of the wealth process reaches a low barrier before a high goal. We assume that the insurer can purchase per-loss reinsurance for every class of insurance business and invest its surplus in a risk-free asset and a risky asset. Using the technique of stochastic control theory and solving the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, we derive the robust optimal investment-reinsurance strategy and the associated value function. We conclude that the robust optimal investment-reinsurance strategy coincides with the one without model ambiguity, but the value function differs. We also illustrate our results by numerical examples.