基于协议分析的设计思维工作坊研究:图书馆使用场景案例研究

Qing Sheng , Nan Liu , Chenlu Zhou , Suhan Li , Zihao Wang
{"title":"基于协议分析的设计思维工作坊研究:图书馆使用场景案例研究","authors":"Qing Sheng ,&nbsp;Nan Liu ,&nbsp;Chenlu Zhou ,&nbsp;Suhan Li ,&nbsp;Zihao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadr.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Design thinking has a broad range of applications beyond the design field, such as in libraries. However, significant differences remain between designers and non-designers in using design thinking tools for innovation. This study investigated these distinctions by examining the design thinking process. In a design thinking workshop focused on library usage, we recruited three groups of participants consisting of both designers and non-designers, who were assigned the same tasks and conducted similar activities. Through protocol analysis, significant cognitive differences between designers and non-designers in the design thinking process were found to involve information intention, long-term memory, working memory, creative thinking, and externalization. We concluded that the involvement of a designer is optimal for non-designers when using design thinking for innovation, particularly during the problem-framing stage. Additionally, we summarized the challenges faced by non-designers in utilizing design thinking for innovation and provided recommendations for improving design thinking workshops, including considerations for time management and staff allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100031,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Design Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 63-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on design thinking workshop based on protocol analysis: A case study of library usage scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Qing Sheng ,&nbsp;Nan Liu ,&nbsp;Chenlu Zhou ,&nbsp;Suhan Li ,&nbsp;Zihao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijadr.2024.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Design thinking has a broad range of applications beyond the design field, such as in libraries. However, significant differences remain between designers and non-designers in using design thinking tools for innovation. This study investigated these distinctions by examining the design thinking process. In a design thinking workshop focused on library usage, we recruited three groups of participants consisting of both designers and non-designers, who were assigned the same tasks and conducted similar activities. Through protocol analysis, significant cognitive differences between designers and non-designers in the design thinking process were found to involve information intention, long-term memory, working memory, creative thinking, and externalization. We concluded that the involvement of a designer is optimal for non-designers when using design thinking for innovation, particularly during the problem-framing stage. Additionally, we summarized the challenges faced by non-designers in utilizing design thinking for innovation and provided recommendations for improving design thinking workshops, including considerations for time management and staff allocation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Design Research\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Design Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978252400015X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978252400015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计思维在设计领域之外也有广泛的应用,比如图书馆。然而,在使用设计思维工具进行创新方面,设计师和非设计师之间仍然存在着明显的差异。本研究通过考察设计思维过程来研究这些区别。在一次以图书馆使用为主题的设计思维研讨会上,我们招募了三组参与者,其中既有设计师也有非设计师,他们被分配了相同的任务,并开展了类似的活动。通过协议分析,我们发现设计者和非设计者在设计思维过程中存在明显的认知差异,涉及信息意向、长期记忆、工作记忆、创造性思维和外化。我们得出结论,在使用设计思维进行创新时,尤其是在问题框架阶段,设计师的参与对非设计师来说是最佳选择。此外,我们还总结了非设计师在利用设计思维进行创新时所面临的挑战,并提出了改进设计思维研讨会的建议,包括对时间管理和人员分配的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on design thinking workshop based on protocol analysis: A case study of library usage scenarios
Design thinking has a broad range of applications beyond the design field, such as in libraries. However, significant differences remain between designers and non-designers in using design thinking tools for innovation. This study investigated these distinctions by examining the design thinking process. In a design thinking workshop focused on library usage, we recruited three groups of participants consisting of both designers and non-designers, who were assigned the same tasks and conducted similar activities. Through protocol analysis, significant cognitive differences between designers and non-designers in the design thinking process were found to involve information intention, long-term memory, working memory, creative thinking, and externalization. We concluded that the involvement of a designer is optimal for non-designers when using design thinking for innovation, particularly during the problem-framing stage. Additionally, we summarized the challenges faced by non-designers in utilizing design thinking for innovation and provided recommendations for improving design thinking workshops, including considerations for time management and staff allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring opportunities for online pharmacy design for Moroccan citizens Withdrawal notice to: The five-factor model, social network, and social influence in instant messaging groups [Adv. Des. Res. 2 (2024) 14–25] Design interventions for sustainable eating: Case studies across UK and China Design as an agent of narratives: A matrix and framework for incorporating narratives into design processes Effects of color temperature and time gradients on visual fatigue recovery in closed cabin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1