Dominique Bowen Butchart , Karen Michelle Christie-Whitehead , Geoff Roberts , Rowan Eisner , Hayden Reinke , Sineka Munidasa , Ainslie Macdonald , Vaughan Higgins , Natalie Doran-Browne , Matthew Tom Harrison
{"title":"推进澳大利亚肉牛和肉羊排放账户的量化 - 碳汇和排放热点在实现净零排放的道路上展开激烈角逐","authors":"Dominique Bowen Butchart , Karen Michelle Christie-Whitehead , Geoff Roberts , Rowan Eisner , Hayden Reinke , Sineka Munidasa , Ainslie Macdonald , Vaughan Higgins , Natalie Doran-Browne , Matthew Tom Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Rapid decarbonisation is required to mitigate climate change. An overdependence on land-based carbon capture threatens food production, indigenous and local rights, biodiversity, and climate overshoot. Accurate emissions estimates are important for tracking progress towards net zero goals and efficiently determining land requirements to balance un-avoided emissions.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Here we examine spatiotemporal greenhouse gas profiles of Australia's national beef cattle and sheep production including the primary categories allocated by the Australian red meat industry. We assess performance at finer regional disaggregation and incorporate spatially referenced forest carbon cycling. The capacity of National Greenhouse Inventory estimates to represent mitigation progress is explored, and limitations of land-based offset pathways are discussed.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We combine emission accounting methods with biophysical models to quantify spatially explicit trends in emissions accounts. Annual estimates are produced from 2011 to 2020 across 46 regions representing >99.5 % of Australia's beef cattle and sheep production.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We reveal net emissions have reduced from 158 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2011 to 50 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2020. Reductions are associated with declining forest loss whereas other direct sources such as enteric methane are relatively stable and reflect animal numbers rather than practice change. Our results highlight the power of regionally disaggregated emissions assessments by novelly revealing 12 grazing regions have surpassed net zero accounts in 2020. The scale of forest emission flux suggests strategic forest source-sink shifts have the potential to offset interim beef cattle and sheep emissions. However, access to forest offsets are likely to become competitive and the extent to which net zero objectives can draw on afforestation pathways will be limited by social, environmental and economic constraints. Medium to long-term achievement and maintenance of net zero emission profiles will require progress to be made in reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions. Our spatially explicit methods and investigation of National Greenhouse Inventory inputs indicate greater accuracy in industry estimates may be achieved. We recommend direct emission avoidance pathways including halted deforestation and enteric methane avoidance are prioritised rather than relying on offsets to balance accounts.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Our assessment informs the beef cattle and sheep industries and relevant government organisations of method advancement opportunities to improve the accuracy of national emission estimates, track progress towards net zero commitments and promote efficiency in land-based carbon capture and storage requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 104168"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing quantification of Australia's beef cattle and sheep emissions accounts - Carbon sinks and emissions hot spots battle it out en route to net zero\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Bowen Butchart , Karen Michelle Christie-Whitehead , Geoff Roberts , Rowan Eisner , Hayden Reinke , Sineka Munidasa , Ainslie Macdonald , Vaughan Higgins , Natalie Doran-Browne , Matthew Tom Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Rapid decarbonisation is required to mitigate climate change. An overdependence on land-based carbon capture threatens food production, indigenous and local rights, biodiversity, and climate overshoot. Accurate emissions estimates are important for tracking progress towards net zero goals and efficiently determining land requirements to balance un-avoided emissions.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Here we examine spatiotemporal greenhouse gas profiles of Australia's national beef cattle and sheep production including the primary categories allocated by the Australian red meat industry. We assess performance at finer regional disaggregation and incorporate spatially referenced forest carbon cycling. The capacity of National Greenhouse Inventory estimates to represent mitigation progress is explored, and limitations of land-based offset pathways are discussed.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We combine emission accounting methods with biophysical models to quantify spatially explicit trends in emissions accounts. Annual estimates are produced from 2011 to 2020 across 46 regions representing >99.5 % of Australia's beef cattle and sheep production.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We reveal net emissions have reduced from 158 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2011 to 50 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2020. Reductions are associated with declining forest loss whereas other direct sources such as enteric methane are relatively stable and reflect animal numbers rather than practice change. Our results highlight the power of regionally disaggregated emissions assessments by novelly revealing 12 grazing regions have surpassed net zero accounts in 2020. The scale of forest emission flux suggests strategic forest source-sink shifts have the potential to offset interim beef cattle and sheep emissions. However, access to forest offsets are likely to become competitive and the extent to which net zero objectives can draw on afforestation pathways will be limited by social, environmental and economic constraints. Medium to long-term achievement and maintenance of net zero emission profiles will require progress to be made in reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions. Our spatially explicit methods and investigation of National Greenhouse Inventory inputs indicate greater accuracy in industry estimates may be achieved. We recommend direct emission avoidance pathways including halted deforestation and enteric methane avoidance are prioritised rather than relying on offsets to balance accounts.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Our assessment informs the beef cattle and sheep industries and relevant government organisations of method advancement opportunities to improve the accuracy of national emission estimates, track progress towards net zero commitments and promote efficiency in land-based carbon capture and storage requirements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003184\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing quantification of Australia's beef cattle and sheep emissions accounts - Carbon sinks and emissions hot spots battle it out en route to net zero
CONTEXT
Rapid decarbonisation is required to mitigate climate change. An overdependence on land-based carbon capture threatens food production, indigenous and local rights, biodiversity, and climate overshoot. Accurate emissions estimates are important for tracking progress towards net zero goals and efficiently determining land requirements to balance un-avoided emissions.
OBJECTIVE
Here we examine spatiotemporal greenhouse gas profiles of Australia's national beef cattle and sheep production including the primary categories allocated by the Australian red meat industry. We assess performance at finer regional disaggregation and incorporate spatially referenced forest carbon cycling. The capacity of National Greenhouse Inventory estimates to represent mitigation progress is explored, and limitations of land-based offset pathways are discussed.
METHODS
We combine emission accounting methods with biophysical models to quantify spatially explicit trends in emissions accounts. Annual estimates are produced from 2011 to 2020 across 46 regions representing >99.5 % of Australia's beef cattle and sheep production.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
We reveal net emissions have reduced from 158 Mt. CO2-e in 2011 to 50 Mt. CO2-e in 2020. Reductions are associated with declining forest loss whereas other direct sources such as enteric methane are relatively stable and reflect animal numbers rather than practice change. Our results highlight the power of regionally disaggregated emissions assessments by novelly revealing 12 grazing regions have surpassed net zero accounts in 2020. The scale of forest emission flux suggests strategic forest source-sink shifts have the potential to offset interim beef cattle and sheep emissions. However, access to forest offsets are likely to become competitive and the extent to which net zero objectives can draw on afforestation pathways will be limited by social, environmental and economic constraints. Medium to long-term achievement and maintenance of net zero emission profiles will require progress to be made in reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions. Our spatially explicit methods and investigation of National Greenhouse Inventory inputs indicate greater accuracy in industry estimates may be achieved. We recommend direct emission avoidance pathways including halted deforestation and enteric methane avoidance are prioritised rather than relying on offsets to balance accounts.
SIGNIFICANCE
Our assessment informs the beef cattle and sheep industries and relevant government organisations of method advancement opportunities to improve the accuracy of national emission estimates, track progress towards net zero commitments and promote efficiency in land-based carbon capture and storage requirements.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.