推进澳大利亚肉牛和肉羊排放账户的量化 - 碳汇和排放热点在实现净零排放的道路上展开激烈角逐

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104168
Dominique Bowen Butchart , Karen Michelle Christie-Whitehead , Geoff Roberts , Rowan Eisner , Hayden Reinke , Sineka Munidasa , Ainslie Macdonald , Vaughan Higgins , Natalie Doran-Browne , Matthew Tom Harrison
{"title":"推进澳大利亚肉牛和肉羊排放账户的量化 - 碳汇和排放热点在实现净零排放的道路上展开激烈角逐","authors":"Dominique Bowen Butchart ,&nbsp;Karen Michelle Christie-Whitehead ,&nbsp;Geoff Roberts ,&nbsp;Rowan Eisner ,&nbsp;Hayden Reinke ,&nbsp;Sineka Munidasa ,&nbsp;Ainslie Macdonald ,&nbsp;Vaughan Higgins ,&nbsp;Natalie Doran-Browne ,&nbsp;Matthew Tom Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Rapid decarbonisation is required to mitigate climate change. An overdependence on land-based carbon capture threatens food production, indigenous and local rights, biodiversity, and climate overshoot. Accurate emissions estimates are important for tracking progress towards net zero goals and efficiently determining land requirements to balance un-avoided emissions.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Here we examine spatiotemporal greenhouse gas profiles of Australia's national beef cattle and sheep production including the primary categories allocated by the Australian red meat industry. We assess performance at finer regional disaggregation and incorporate spatially referenced forest carbon cycling. The capacity of National Greenhouse Inventory estimates to represent mitigation progress is explored, and limitations of land-based offset pathways are discussed.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We combine emission accounting methods with biophysical models to quantify spatially explicit trends in emissions accounts. Annual estimates are produced from 2011 to 2020 across 46 regions representing &gt;99.5 % of Australia's beef cattle and sheep production.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We reveal net emissions have reduced from 158 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2011 to 50 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2020. Reductions are associated with declining forest loss whereas other direct sources such as enteric methane are relatively stable and reflect animal numbers rather than practice change. Our results highlight the power of regionally disaggregated emissions assessments by novelly revealing 12 grazing regions have surpassed net zero accounts in 2020. The scale of forest emission flux suggests strategic forest source-sink shifts have the potential to offset interim beef cattle and sheep emissions. However, access to forest offsets are likely to become competitive and the extent to which net zero objectives can draw on afforestation pathways will be limited by social, environmental and economic constraints. Medium to long-term achievement and maintenance of net zero emission profiles will require progress to be made in reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions. Our spatially explicit methods and investigation of National Greenhouse Inventory inputs indicate greater accuracy in industry estimates may be achieved. We recommend direct emission avoidance pathways including halted deforestation and enteric methane avoidance are prioritised rather than relying on offsets to balance accounts.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Our assessment informs the beef cattle and sheep industries and relevant government organisations of method advancement opportunities to improve the accuracy of national emission estimates, track progress towards net zero commitments and promote efficiency in land-based carbon capture and storage requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 104168"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing quantification of Australia's beef cattle and sheep emissions accounts - Carbon sinks and emissions hot spots battle it out en route to net zero\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Bowen Butchart ,&nbsp;Karen Michelle Christie-Whitehead ,&nbsp;Geoff Roberts ,&nbsp;Rowan Eisner ,&nbsp;Hayden Reinke ,&nbsp;Sineka Munidasa ,&nbsp;Ainslie Macdonald ,&nbsp;Vaughan Higgins ,&nbsp;Natalie Doran-Browne ,&nbsp;Matthew Tom Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Rapid decarbonisation is required to mitigate climate change. An overdependence on land-based carbon capture threatens food production, indigenous and local rights, biodiversity, and climate overshoot. Accurate emissions estimates are important for tracking progress towards net zero goals and efficiently determining land requirements to balance un-avoided emissions.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Here we examine spatiotemporal greenhouse gas profiles of Australia's national beef cattle and sheep production including the primary categories allocated by the Australian red meat industry. We assess performance at finer regional disaggregation and incorporate spatially referenced forest carbon cycling. The capacity of National Greenhouse Inventory estimates to represent mitigation progress is explored, and limitations of land-based offset pathways are discussed.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We combine emission accounting methods with biophysical models to quantify spatially explicit trends in emissions accounts. Annual estimates are produced from 2011 to 2020 across 46 regions representing &gt;99.5 % of Australia's beef cattle and sheep production.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We reveal net emissions have reduced from 158 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2011 to 50 Mt. CO<sub>2</sub>-e in 2020. Reductions are associated with declining forest loss whereas other direct sources such as enteric methane are relatively stable and reflect animal numbers rather than practice change. Our results highlight the power of regionally disaggregated emissions assessments by novelly revealing 12 grazing regions have surpassed net zero accounts in 2020. The scale of forest emission flux suggests strategic forest source-sink shifts have the potential to offset interim beef cattle and sheep emissions. However, access to forest offsets are likely to become competitive and the extent to which net zero objectives can draw on afforestation pathways will be limited by social, environmental and economic constraints. Medium to long-term achievement and maintenance of net zero emission profiles will require progress to be made in reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions. Our spatially explicit methods and investigation of National Greenhouse Inventory inputs indicate greater accuracy in industry estimates may be achieved. We recommend direct emission avoidance pathways including halted deforestation and enteric methane avoidance are prioritised rather than relying on offsets to balance accounts.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Our assessment informs the beef cattle and sheep industries and relevant government organisations of method advancement opportunities to improve the accuracy of national emission estimates, track progress towards net zero commitments and promote efficiency in land-based carbon capture and storage requirements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003184\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内容提要为减缓气候变化,必须迅速实现脱碳。过度依赖陆地碳捕获会威胁到粮食生产、土著和地方权利、生物多样性和气候过剩。准确的排放估算对于跟踪实现净零排放目标的进展以及有效确定土地需求以平衡未避免的排放非常重要。我们评估了更精细的区域分类性能,并纳入了空间参考森林碳循环。我们探讨了国家温室气体清单估算值代表减缓进展的能力,并讨论了基于土地的抵消途径的局限性。从 2011 年到 2020 年,我们对 46 个地区进行了年度估算,这些地区代表了澳大利亚 99.5% 的肉牛和绵羊生产。CO2-e 降至 2020 年的 5000 万吨。排放量的减少与森林损失的减少有关,而其他直接来源(如肠道甲烷)则相对稳定,反映了动物数量而非实践的变化。我们的结果突出了按地区分列的排放评估的力量,新颖地揭示了 12 个放牧地区在 2020 年已超过净零账户。森林排放通量的规模表明,战略性森林源汇转移有可能抵消肉牛和肉羊的临时排放量。然而,森林抵消的获取可能会变得具有竞争性,净零排放目标利用植树造林途径的程度将受到社会、环境和经济制约因素的限制。中长期实现和保持净零排放需要在减少直接温室气体排放方面取得进展。我们的空间明确方法和对国家温室气体清单输入的调查表明,可以提高行业估算的准确性。我们建议优先考虑避免直接排放的途径,包括停止毁林和避免肠道甲烷排放,而不是依靠抵消来平衡账目。我们的评估为肉牛和肉羊行业及相关政府组织提供了方法改进的机会,以提高国家排放估算的准确性,跟踪实现净零排放承诺的进展,并提高陆基碳捕集与封存要求的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing quantification of Australia's beef cattle and sheep emissions accounts - Carbon sinks and emissions hot spots battle it out en route to net zero

CONTEXT

Rapid decarbonisation is required to mitigate climate change. An overdependence on land-based carbon capture threatens food production, indigenous and local rights, biodiversity, and climate overshoot. Accurate emissions estimates are important for tracking progress towards net zero goals and efficiently determining land requirements to balance un-avoided emissions.

OBJECTIVE

Here we examine spatiotemporal greenhouse gas profiles of Australia's national beef cattle and sheep production including the primary categories allocated by the Australian red meat industry. We assess performance at finer regional disaggregation and incorporate spatially referenced forest carbon cycling. The capacity of National Greenhouse Inventory estimates to represent mitigation progress is explored, and limitations of land-based offset pathways are discussed.

METHODS

We combine emission accounting methods with biophysical models to quantify spatially explicit trends in emissions accounts. Annual estimates are produced from 2011 to 2020 across 46 regions representing >99.5 % of Australia's beef cattle and sheep production.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We reveal net emissions have reduced from 158 Mt. CO2-e in 2011 to 50 Mt. CO2-e in 2020. Reductions are associated with declining forest loss whereas other direct sources such as enteric methane are relatively stable and reflect animal numbers rather than practice change. Our results highlight the power of regionally disaggregated emissions assessments by novelly revealing 12 grazing regions have surpassed net zero accounts in 2020. The scale of forest emission flux suggests strategic forest source-sink shifts have the potential to offset interim beef cattle and sheep emissions. However, access to forest offsets are likely to become competitive and the extent to which net zero objectives can draw on afforestation pathways will be limited by social, environmental and economic constraints. Medium to long-term achievement and maintenance of net zero emission profiles will require progress to be made in reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions. Our spatially explicit methods and investigation of National Greenhouse Inventory inputs indicate greater accuracy in industry estimates may be achieved. We recommend direct emission avoidance pathways including halted deforestation and enteric methane avoidance are prioritised rather than relying on offsets to balance accounts.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our assessment informs the beef cattle and sheep industries and relevant government organisations of method advancement opportunities to improve the accuracy of national emission estimates, track progress towards net zero commitments and promote efficiency in land-based carbon capture and storage requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
On-farm water quality: Co-design of result-based indicators Editorial Board Silvopastoral system as a climate-smart alternative for beef production: Enteric methane emission neutralization and animal thermal comfort increase Strengthening livestock systems through Sorghum-based fodder value chain innovations in southern India Seed certification, certified seeds use and yield outcomes in Nigeria: Insights from nationally-representative farm panel data and seed company location data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1