65 年后重新审视和验证 Lassen 的大脑自动调节图:血管活性药物治疗对脑血流量的影响

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007280
Lingzhong Meng, Yanhua Sun, Mads Rasmussen, Nicole Bianca S Libiran, Semanti Naiken, Kylie S Meacham, Jacob D Schmidt, Niloy K Lahiri, Jiange Han, Ziyue Liu, David C Adams, Adrian W Gelb
{"title":"65 年后重新审视和验证 Lassen 的大脑自动调节图:血管活性药物治疗对脑血流量的影响","authors":"Lingzhong Meng, Yanhua Sun, Mads Rasmussen, Nicole Bianca S Libiran, Semanti Naiken, Kylie S Meacham, Jacob D Schmidt, Niloy K Lahiri, Jiange Han, Ziyue Liu, David C Adams, Adrian W Gelb","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Niels Lassen's seminal 1959 cerebral autoregulation plot, a cornerstone in understanding the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF), was based on preexisting literature. However, this work has faced criticism for selective data presentation, leading to inaccurate interpretation. This review revisits and validates Lassen's original plot using contemporary data published since 2000. Additionally, we aim to understand the impact of vasoactive drug treatments on CBF, as Lassen's referenced studies used various drugs for blood pressure manipulation. Our findings confirm Lassen's concept of a plateau where CBF remains relatively stable across a specific MAP range in awake humans with normal brains. However, significant variations in cerebral autoregulation among different populations are evident. In critically ill patients and those with traumatic brain injury, the autoregulatory plateau dissipates, necessitating tight blood pressure control to avoid inadequate or excessive cerebral perfusion. A plateau is observed in patients anesthetized with intravenous agents but not with volatile agents. Vasopressor treatments have population-dependent effects, with contemporary data showing increased CBF in critically ill patients but not in awake humans with normal brains. Vasopressor treatment results in a greater increase in CBF during volatile than intravenous anesthesia. Modern antihypertensives do not significantly impact CBF based on contemporary data, exerting a smaller impact on CBF compared to historical data. These insights underscore the importance of individualized blood pressure management guided by modern data in the context of cerebral autoregulation across varied patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lassen's Cerebral Autoregulation Plot Revisited and Validated 65 Years Later: Impacts of Vasoactive Drug Treatment on Cerebral Blood Flow.\",\"authors\":\"Lingzhong Meng, Yanhua Sun, Mads Rasmussen, Nicole Bianca S Libiran, Semanti Naiken, Kylie S Meacham, Jacob D Schmidt, Niloy K Lahiri, Jiange Han, Ziyue Liu, David C Adams, Adrian W Gelb\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Niels Lassen's seminal 1959 cerebral autoregulation plot, a cornerstone in understanding the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF), was based on preexisting literature. However, this work has faced criticism for selective data presentation, leading to inaccurate interpretation. This review revisits and validates Lassen's original plot using contemporary data published since 2000. Additionally, we aim to understand the impact of vasoactive drug treatments on CBF, as Lassen's referenced studies used various drugs for blood pressure manipulation. Our findings confirm Lassen's concept of a plateau where CBF remains relatively stable across a specific MAP range in awake humans with normal brains. However, significant variations in cerebral autoregulation among different populations are evident. In critically ill patients and those with traumatic brain injury, the autoregulatory plateau dissipates, necessitating tight blood pressure control to avoid inadequate or excessive cerebral perfusion. A plateau is observed in patients anesthetized with intravenous agents but not with volatile agents. Vasopressor treatments have population-dependent effects, with contemporary data showing increased CBF in critically ill patients but not in awake humans with normal brains. Vasopressor treatment results in a greater increase in CBF during volatile than intravenous anesthesia. Modern antihypertensives do not significantly impact CBF based on contemporary data, exerting a smaller impact on CBF compared to historical data. These insights underscore the importance of individualized blood pressure management guided by modern data in the context of cerebral autoregulation across varied patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007280\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼尔斯-拉森(Niels Lassen)于 1959 年发表了开创性的脑自动调节图,该图是理解平均动脉压(MAP)与脑血流量(CBF)之间关系的基石,它是基于已有的文献资料绘制的。然而,这项工作曾因数据表述的选择性而受到批评,导致解释不准确。本综述利用 2000 年以来发表的当代数据重新审视并验证了 Lassen 的原始图谱。此外,我们还旨在了解血管活性药物治疗对 CBF 的影响,因为 Lassen 引用的研究使用了各种药物来控制血压。我们的研究结果证实了 Lassen 的高原概念,即在清醒的正常人大脑中,CBF 在特定的 MAP 范围内保持相对稳定。然而,不同人群的大脑自动调节能力存在明显差异。在重症患者和脑外伤患者中,自动调节高原会消失,因此必须严格控制血压,以避免脑灌注不足或过量。使用静脉麻醉剂麻醉的患者会出现高原现象,而使用挥发性麻醉剂则不会。血管加压治疗的效果取决于人群,当代数据显示,危重病人的 CBF 增加,但大脑正常的清醒者的 CBF 却没有增加。与静脉麻醉相比,在挥发性麻醉过程中血管紧张素治疗会导致 CBF 更大的增加。根据当代数据,现代降压药对 CBF 的影响不大,与历史数据相比,对 CBF 的影响较小。这些见解强调了在不同患者群体的大脑自动调节背景下,以现代数据为指导进行个体化血压管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lassen's Cerebral Autoregulation Plot Revisited and Validated 65 Years Later: Impacts of Vasoactive Drug Treatment on Cerebral Blood Flow.

Niels Lassen's seminal 1959 cerebral autoregulation plot, a cornerstone in understanding the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF), was based on preexisting literature. However, this work has faced criticism for selective data presentation, leading to inaccurate interpretation. This review revisits and validates Lassen's original plot using contemporary data published since 2000. Additionally, we aim to understand the impact of vasoactive drug treatments on CBF, as Lassen's referenced studies used various drugs for blood pressure manipulation. Our findings confirm Lassen's concept of a plateau where CBF remains relatively stable across a specific MAP range in awake humans with normal brains. However, significant variations in cerebral autoregulation among different populations are evident. In critically ill patients and those with traumatic brain injury, the autoregulatory plateau dissipates, necessitating tight blood pressure control to avoid inadequate or excessive cerebral perfusion. A plateau is observed in patients anesthetized with intravenous agents but not with volatile agents. Vasopressor treatments have population-dependent effects, with contemporary data showing increased CBF in critically ill patients but not in awake humans with normal brains. Vasopressor treatment results in a greater increase in CBF during volatile than intravenous anesthesia. Modern antihypertensives do not significantly impact CBF based on contemporary data, exerting a smaller impact on CBF compared to historical data. These insights underscore the importance of individualized blood pressure management guided by modern data in the context of cerebral autoregulation across varied patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes Associated with a Patient Blood Management Program in Major Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Airway Evaluation in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis: A Prospective Cohort Study. A Little Blue Butterfly. A Paradigm for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Anesthesia Practice for Children with Autism for the Generalist Clinician. Association Between Two Muscle-Related Parameters and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Tumor Resection Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1