面对面:比较 ChatGPT 与人类在人脸匹配方面的表现。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Perception Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1177/03010066241295992
Robin S S Kramer
{"title":"面对面:比较 ChatGPT 与人类在人脸匹配方面的表现。","authors":"Robin S S Kramer","doi":"10.1177/03010066241295992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ChatGPT's large language model, GPT-4V, has been trained on vast numbers of image-text pairs and is therefore capable of processing visual input. This model operates very differently from current state-of-the-art neural networks designed specifically for face perception and so I chose to investigate whether ChatGPT could also be applied to this domain. With this aim, I focussed on the task of face matching, that is, deciding whether two photographs showed the same person or not. Across six different tests, ChatGPT demonstrated performance that was comparable with human accuracies despite being a domain-general 'virtual assistant' rather than a specialised tool for face processing. This perhaps surprising result identifies a new avenue for exploration in this field, while further research should explore the boundaries of ChatGPT's ability, along with how its errors may relate to those made by humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"3010066241295992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face to face: Comparing ChatGPT with human performance on face matching.\",\"authors\":\"Robin S S Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03010066241295992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ChatGPT's large language model, GPT-4V, has been trained on vast numbers of image-text pairs and is therefore capable of processing visual input. This model operates very differently from current state-of-the-art neural networks designed specifically for face perception and so I chose to investigate whether ChatGPT could also be applied to this domain. With this aim, I focussed on the task of face matching, that is, deciding whether two photographs showed the same person or not. Across six different tests, ChatGPT demonstrated performance that was comparable with human accuracies despite being a domain-general 'virtual assistant' rather than a specialised tool for face processing. This perhaps surprising result identifies a new avenue for exploration in this field, while further research should explore the boundaries of ChatGPT's ability, along with how its errors may relate to those made by humans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perception\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3010066241295992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066241295992\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066241295992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT 的大型语言模型 GPT-4V 已在大量图像-文本对上进行过训练,因此能够处理视觉输入。该模型的运行方式与目前专为人脸感知设计的最先进的神经网络截然不同,因此我选择研究 ChatGPT 是否也能应用于这一领域。为此,我重点研究了人脸匹配任务,即判断两张照片显示的是否是同一个人。在六个不同的测试中,尽管 ChatGPT 是一个通用领域的 "虚拟助手",而不是一个专门处理人脸的工具,但其表现却与人类的准确率不相上下。这一令人惊讶的结果为该领域的探索开辟了一条新途径,而进一步的研究则应探索 ChatGPT 的能力边界,以及它的错误与人类错误之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Face to face: Comparing ChatGPT with human performance on face matching.

ChatGPT's large language model, GPT-4V, has been trained on vast numbers of image-text pairs and is therefore capable of processing visual input. This model operates very differently from current state-of-the-art neural networks designed specifically for face perception and so I chose to investigate whether ChatGPT could also be applied to this domain. With this aim, I focussed on the task of face matching, that is, deciding whether two photographs showed the same person or not. Across six different tests, ChatGPT demonstrated performance that was comparable with human accuracies despite being a domain-general 'virtual assistant' rather than a specialised tool for face processing. This perhaps surprising result identifies a new avenue for exploration in this field, while further research should explore the boundaries of ChatGPT's ability, along with how its errors may relate to those made by humans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Re-examining our evolutionary propensities toward snakes: Insights from children's inattentional blindness. Face to face: Comparing ChatGPT with human performance on face matching. The overestimation of gaze for horizontal, vertical, and diagonal fixation points. Crossmodal to unimodal transfer of temporal perceptual learning. The Ames room and the misunderstood versions and depictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1