商业价格及其对泌尿外科实践的影响:医疗保险男性的前列腺癌护理。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35633
Arnav Srivastava, Xiu Liu, Avinash Maganty, Samuel R Kaufman, Addison Shay, Mary Oerline, Christopher Dall, Kassem S Faraj, Andrew M Ryan, Brent K Hollenbeck, Vahakn B Shahinian
{"title":"商业价格及其对泌尿外科实践的影响:医疗保险男性的前列腺癌护理。","authors":"Arnav Srivastava, Xiu Liu, Avinash Maganty, Samuel R Kaufman, Addison Shay, Mary Oerline, Christopher Dall, Kassem S Faraj, Andrew M Ryan, Brent K Hollenbeck, Vahakn B Shahinian","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For men with prostate cancer, there is substantial variation in the use of conservative management, such as active surveillance. Commercial prices, which vary across urology practices, may afford incentives that foster physician behaviors associated with utilization. Such behaviors may \"spillover\" to the Medicare population and affect quality. This study evaluated the effects of practice-level commercial prices on health care utilization and quality in men with prostate cancer insured by traditional Medicare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a 20% Medicare sample, the authors identified men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2014-2019 (n = 44,653). Using commercial payments from the MarketScan database, they developed a practice-level commercial price index (ratio of commercial prices to Medicare prices). They examined the association of the price index with price standardized spending, overtreatment (treatment among those with >50% noncancer mortality within 10 years), and underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance (at least one prostate-specific antigen test and one confirmatory test-MRI, prostate biopsy, genomic test-within 12 months of diagnosis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practice-level commercial price indices varied from 1.34 (134% of Medicare prices), for practices in the bottom decile, to 3.00, for practices in the top decile. Increasing price index was associated with lower odds of overtreatment (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.97; p = .01), but not price standardized spending or underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Commercial prices vary markedly across urology practices. Among newly diagnosed men with traditional Medicare, those managed by practices with higher commercial price indices had lower odds of overtreatment, suggesting improved prostate cancer care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial prices and their influence on urology practices: Prostate cancer care among men with Medicare.\",\"authors\":\"Arnav Srivastava, Xiu Liu, Avinash Maganty, Samuel R Kaufman, Addison Shay, Mary Oerline, Christopher Dall, Kassem S Faraj, Andrew M Ryan, Brent K Hollenbeck, Vahakn B Shahinian\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For men with prostate cancer, there is substantial variation in the use of conservative management, such as active surveillance. Commercial prices, which vary across urology practices, may afford incentives that foster physician behaviors associated with utilization. Such behaviors may \\\"spillover\\\" to the Medicare population and affect quality. This study evaluated the effects of practice-level commercial prices on health care utilization and quality in men with prostate cancer insured by traditional Medicare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a 20% Medicare sample, the authors identified men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2014-2019 (n = 44,653). Using commercial payments from the MarketScan database, they developed a practice-level commercial price index (ratio of commercial prices to Medicare prices). They examined the association of the price index with price standardized spending, overtreatment (treatment among those with >50% noncancer mortality within 10 years), and underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance (at least one prostate-specific antigen test and one confirmatory test-MRI, prostate biopsy, genomic test-within 12 months of diagnosis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practice-level commercial price indices varied from 1.34 (134% of Medicare prices), for practices in the bottom decile, to 3.00, for practices in the top decile. Increasing price index was associated with lower odds of overtreatment (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.97; p = .01), but not price standardized spending or underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Commercial prices vary markedly across urology practices. Among newly diagnosed men with traditional Medicare, those managed by practices with higher commercial price indices had lower odds of overtreatment, suggesting improved prostate cancer care quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35633\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于男性前列腺癌患者来说,保守治疗(如主动监测)的使用存在很大差异。不同泌尿科诊所的商业价格各不相同,这可能会激励医生采取与使用相关的行为。这些行为可能会 "波及 "医疗保险人群并影响质量。本研究评估了诊所层面的商业价格对参加传统医疗保险的前列腺癌男性患者的医疗利用率和质量的影响:作者从 20% 的医疗保险样本中确定了 2014-2019 年间新诊断出前列腺癌的男性患者(n = 44653)。利用 MarketScan 数据库中的商业支付,他们制定了实践层面的商业价格指数(商业价格与医疗保险价格之比)。他们研究了价格指数与价格标准化支出、过度治疗(10 年内非癌症死亡率大于 50% 的患者接受治疗)以及积极监测中诊断检测使用不足(诊断后 12 个月内至少进行一次前列腺特异性抗原检测和一次确诊检测--MRI、前列腺活检、基因组检测)之间的关联:医疗机构的商业价格指数从最低十分位数的 1.34(医疗保险价格的 134%)到最高十分位数的 3.00 不等。价格指数的增加与过度治疗的几率降低有关(几率比,0.86;95% 置信区间,0.76-0.97;P = .01),但与价格标准化支出或积极监测中诊断检测使用不足无关:结论:不同泌尿科诊所的商业价格差异显著。结论:不同泌尿科诊所的商业价格差异显著。在新诊断的传统医疗保险男性患者中,商业价格指数较高的诊所管理的患者过度治疗的几率较低,这表明前列腺癌护理质量有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commercial prices and their influence on urology practices: Prostate cancer care among men with Medicare.

Background: For men with prostate cancer, there is substantial variation in the use of conservative management, such as active surveillance. Commercial prices, which vary across urology practices, may afford incentives that foster physician behaviors associated with utilization. Such behaviors may "spillover" to the Medicare population and affect quality. This study evaluated the effects of practice-level commercial prices on health care utilization and quality in men with prostate cancer insured by traditional Medicare.

Methods: From a 20% Medicare sample, the authors identified men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 2014-2019 (n = 44,653). Using commercial payments from the MarketScan database, they developed a practice-level commercial price index (ratio of commercial prices to Medicare prices). They examined the association of the price index with price standardized spending, overtreatment (treatment among those with >50% noncancer mortality within 10 years), and underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance (at least one prostate-specific antigen test and one confirmatory test-MRI, prostate biopsy, genomic test-within 12 months of diagnosis).

Results: Practice-level commercial price indices varied from 1.34 (134% of Medicare prices), for practices in the bottom decile, to 3.00, for practices in the top decile. Increasing price index was associated with lower odds of overtreatment (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.97; p = .01), but not price standardized spending or underuse of diagnostic testing in active surveillance.

Conclusions: Commercial prices vary markedly across urology practices. Among newly diagnosed men with traditional Medicare, those managed by practices with higher commercial price indices had lower odds of overtreatment, suggesting improved prostate cancer care quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-relevant outcomes in comprehensive cancer centers versus noncomprehensive cancer centers. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline update on palliative care for patients with cancer: Addressing the reality gap. Embrace with caution: The limitations of generative artificial intelligence in responding to patient health care queries. Expression of Concern. Global disparities in cancer care: Bridging the gap in affordability and access to medications between high and low-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1