通过主观充气技术评估儿科患者气管插管袖带压力:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02780-7
Darunee Sripadungkul, Nawaporn Tanasoontornsut, Prathana Wittayapairoch, Thitinuch Ruenhunsa, Peerapong Sangsungnern, Cattleya Kasemsiri, Nathee Maneewan, Sutida Boonkamjad
{"title":"通过主观充气技术评估儿科患者气管插管袖带压力:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Darunee Sripadungkul, Nawaporn Tanasoontornsut, Prathana Wittayapairoch, Thitinuch Ruenhunsa, Peerapong Sangsungnern, Cattleya Kasemsiri, Nathee Maneewan, Sutida Boonkamjad","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02780-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are commonly used in pediatric patients, with the gold standard for measuring cuff pressure being a cuff pressure manometer. However, this equipment is not always available in every operating room. Subjective inflation techniques, such as the minimal occluding volume (MOV) technique and the stethoscope-guided (Steth) technique, offer convenient and safe alternatives to standard methods but do not provide quantitative measurements. This study aimed to evaluate ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective techniques (MOV and Steth) in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. We included healthy pediatric patients aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with a cuffed ETT. The primary objective of this study was to compare the mean ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective inflation techniques (MOV and Steth method). The secondary objectives include identifying factors associated with inappropriate inflation and evaluating post-intubation complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four pediatric patients were analyzed. The overall mean ETT cuff pressure was 26.52 ± 8.68 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The target was achieved in 46.88% of patients, with overinflation in 32.81% and underinflation in 20.31%. The mean ETT cuff pressure in the MOV group was 27.77 ± 8.89 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and in the Steth group was 25.33 ± 8.34 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, with a non-significant mean difference of 2.44 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95% CI [-1.89, 6.77], p = 0.264). The mean volume of air inflated in the MOV group was 0.78 ± 0.25 ml, and in the Steth group was 0.68 ± 0.22 ml, with a non-significant mean difference of 0.10 ml (95% CI [-0.01, 0.22], p = 0.084). Younger age, lower weight, and shorter height were significantly associated with an increased risk of overinflation. An ETT size with an internal diameter (ID) of 5 mm was significantly associated with an increased risk of underinflation. No post-intubation complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subjective inflation techniques (MOV or Steth) achieve target ETT cuff pressures in less than 50%, and carry the risks of both overinflation and underinflation, even without post-intubation complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>TCTR20211016001 (registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry on October 16, 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evaluation of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in pediatric patients by subjective inflation techniques: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Darunee Sripadungkul, Nawaporn Tanasoontornsut, Prathana Wittayapairoch, Thitinuch Ruenhunsa, Peerapong Sangsungnern, Cattleya Kasemsiri, Nathee Maneewan, Sutida Boonkamjad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-024-02780-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are commonly used in pediatric patients, with the gold standard for measuring cuff pressure being a cuff pressure manometer. However, this equipment is not always available in every operating room. Subjective inflation techniques, such as the minimal occluding volume (MOV) technique and the stethoscope-guided (Steth) technique, offer convenient and safe alternatives to standard methods but do not provide quantitative measurements. This study aimed to evaluate ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective techniques (MOV and Steth) in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. We included healthy pediatric patients aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with a cuffed ETT. The primary objective of this study was to compare the mean ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective inflation techniques (MOV and Steth method). The secondary objectives include identifying factors associated with inappropriate inflation and evaluating post-intubation complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four pediatric patients were analyzed. The overall mean ETT cuff pressure was 26.52 ± 8.68 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The target was achieved in 46.88% of patients, with overinflation in 32.81% and underinflation in 20.31%. The mean ETT cuff pressure in the MOV group was 27.77 ± 8.89 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and in the Steth group was 25.33 ± 8.34 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, with a non-significant mean difference of 2.44 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95% CI [-1.89, 6.77], p = 0.264). The mean volume of air inflated in the MOV group was 0.78 ± 0.25 ml, and in the Steth group was 0.68 ± 0.22 ml, with a non-significant mean difference of 0.10 ml (95% CI [-0.01, 0.22], p = 0.084). Younger age, lower weight, and shorter height were significantly associated with an increased risk of overinflation. An ETT size with an internal diameter (ID) of 5 mm was significantly associated with an increased risk of underinflation. No post-intubation complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subjective inflation techniques (MOV or Steth) achieve target ETT cuff pressures in less than 50%, and carry the risks of both overinflation and underinflation, even without post-intubation complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>TCTR20211016001 (registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry on October 16, 2021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536933/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02780-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02780-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:袖带气管插管(ETT)常用于儿科患者,测量袖带压力的黄金标准是袖带压力计。然而,并非每个手术室都有这种设备。主观充气技术,如最小闭塞容积(MOV)技术和听诊器引导(Steth)技术,提供了替代标准方法的方便、安全的方法,但不能提供定量测量。本研究旨在评估儿科患者使用两种主观技术(MOV 和 Steth)时 ETT 袖带的压力和充气量:这项前瞻性观察研究在泰国孔敬大学医学院麻醉学系进行。研究对象包括 2 至 7 岁的健康儿科患者,他们都是在全身麻醉下使用带袖带的 ETT 接受择期手术的。本研究的主要目的是比较两种主观充气技术(MOV 法和 Steth 法)的平均 ETT 袖带压力和充气量。次要目标包括确定与充气不当相关的因素以及评估插管后并发症:对 64 名儿科患者进行了分析。总体平均 ETT 袖带压力为 26.52 ± 8.68 cmH2O。46.88%的患者达到了目标值,32.81%的患者充气过度,20.31%的患者充气不足。MOV 组的平均 ETT 袖带压力为 27.77 ± 8.89 cmH2O,Steth 组为 25.33 ± 8.34 cmH2O,平均差异为 2.44 cmH2O(95% CI [-1.89, 6.77],P = 0.264),差异不显著。MOV 组的平均充气量为 0.78 ± 0.25 毫升,Steth 组为 0.68 ± 0.22 毫升,平均差异为 0.10 毫升,不显著(95% CI [-0.01, 0.22],p = 0.084)。年龄较小、体重较轻和身高较矮与过度充气风险增加有显著相关性。内径(ID)为 5 毫米的 ETT 与充气不足风险增加有显著相关性。没有插管后并发症的报告:结论:即使没有插管后并发症,主观充气技术(MOV 或 Steth)达到 ETT 袖带目标压力的比例也不到 50%,并且存在充气过度和充气不足的风险:试验注册:TCTR20211016001(2021 年 10 月 16 日在泰国临床试验注册处注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evaluation of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in pediatric patients by subjective inflation techniques: a prospective observational study.

Background: Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are commonly used in pediatric patients, with the gold standard for measuring cuff pressure being a cuff pressure manometer. However, this equipment is not always available in every operating room. Subjective inflation techniques, such as the minimal occluding volume (MOV) technique and the stethoscope-guided (Steth) technique, offer convenient and safe alternatives to standard methods but do not provide quantitative measurements. This study aimed to evaluate ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective techniques (MOV and Steth) in pediatric patients.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. We included healthy pediatric patients aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with a cuffed ETT. The primary objective of this study was to compare the mean ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective inflation techniques (MOV and Steth method). The secondary objectives include identifying factors associated with inappropriate inflation and evaluating post-intubation complications.

Results: Sixty-four pediatric patients were analyzed. The overall mean ETT cuff pressure was 26.52 ± 8.68 cmH2O. The target was achieved in 46.88% of patients, with overinflation in 32.81% and underinflation in 20.31%. The mean ETT cuff pressure in the MOV group was 27.77 ± 8.89 cmH2O and in the Steth group was 25.33 ± 8.34 cmH2O, with a non-significant mean difference of 2.44 cmH2O (95% CI [-1.89, 6.77], p = 0.264). The mean volume of air inflated in the MOV group was 0.78 ± 0.25 ml, and in the Steth group was 0.68 ± 0.22 ml, with a non-significant mean difference of 0.10 ml (95% CI [-0.01, 0.22], p = 0.084). Younger age, lower weight, and shorter height were significantly associated with an increased risk of overinflation. An ETT size with an internal diameter (ID) of 5 mm was significantly associated with an increased risk of underinflation. No post-intubation complications were reported.

Conclusions: Subjective inflation techniques (MOV or Steth) achieve target ETT cuff pressures in less than 50%, and carry the risks of both overinflation and underinflation, even without post-intubation complications.

Trial registration: TCTR20211016001 (registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry on October 16, 2021).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1