近期重度抑郁障碍青少年的神经认知功能障碍:一项横断面比较研究。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1007/s00787-024-02599-0
Olga Bienek, Kelly Allott, Linda Antonucci, Alessandro Bertolino, Carolina Bonivento, Stephan Borgwardt, Paolo Brambilla, Katharine Chisholm, Udo Dannlowski, Theresa K Lichtenstein, Joseph Kambeitz, Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Rebekka Lencer, Siân Lowri Griffiths, Eleonora Maggioni, Eva Meisenzahl, Christos Pantelis, Marlene Rosen, Stephan Ruhrmann, Raimo K R Salokangas, Alexandra Stainton, Marian Surmann, Rachel Upthegrove, Julian Wenzel, Stephen J Wood, Georg Romer, Jörg Michael Müller
{"title":"近期重度抑郁障碍青少年的神经认知功能障碍:一项横断面比较研究。","authors":"Olga Bienek, Kelly Allott, Linda Antonucci, Alessandro Bertolino, Carolina Bonivento, Stephan Borgwardt, Paolo Brambilla, Katharine Chisholm, Udo Dannlowski, Theresa K Lichtenstein, Joseph Kambeitz, Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Rebekka Lencer, Siân Lowri Griffiths, Eleonora Maggioni, Eva Meisenzahl, Christos Pantelis, Marlene Rosen, Stephan Ruhrmann, Raimo K R Salokangas, Alexandra Stainton, Marian Surmann, Rachel Upthegrove, Julian Wenzel, Stephen J Wood, Georg Romer, Jörg Michael Müller","doi":"10.1007/s00787-024-02599-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the neurocognitive deficits associated with the first episode of major depressive disorder (recent onset depression, ROD) in adolescents as compared to adult patients. Cross-sectional neurocognitive data from the baseline assessments of the PRONIA study with N = 650 (55.31% females) were analyzed. Based on a principal component analysis of eleven neurocognitive tests, we constructed an overall neurocognitive performance (NP) score. We examined mean score differences in NP between the groups of healthy controls (HC) and ROD and between adolescents (15-21 years) and adults (22-40 years) within a GLM approach. This accounts for unbalanced data with focus on interaction effects while controlling for effects of medication and educational years. Our results show lower NP for the ROD as compared to the HC group (d = - 0.29, p = .046) and lower NP for the adolescent group as compared to the adult group (d = - 0.29; p < .039). There was no interaction between these two group effects (F = 1.11; p = .29). Our findings suggest that the detrimental effect of ROD on neurocognitive functioning is comparable in adolescent and adult patients, since lower scores in adolescent patients are explained by effects of age and education. Neurocognitive impairment is an under addressed issue in clinical treatment guidelines for adolescent MDD. We suggest efficient monitoring in clinical practice by using an aggregate of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and the Trail Making Test B, which highly correlated with the overall score of NP (r = 0.82).</p>","PeriodicalId":11856,"journal":{"name":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurocognitive dysfunction in adolescents with recent onset major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Olga Bienek, Kelly Allott, Linda Antonucci, Alessandro Bertolino, Carolina Bonivento, Stephan Borgwardt, Paolo Brambilla, Katharine Chisholm, Udo Dannlowski, Theresa K Lichtenstein, Joseph Kambeitz, Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Rebekka Lencer, Siân Lowri Griffiths, Eleonora Maggioni, Eva Meisenzahl, Christos Pantelis, Marlene Rosen, Stephan Ruhrmann, Raimo K R Salokangas, Alexandra Stainton, Marian Surmann, Rachel Upthegrove, Julian Wenzel, Stephen J Wood, Georg Romer, Jörg Michael Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00787-024-02599-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the neurocognitive deficits associated with the first episode of major depressive disorder (recent onset depression, ROD) in adolescents as compared to adult patients. Cross-sectional neurocognitive data from the baseline assessments of the PRONIA study with N = 650 (55.31% females) were analyzed. Based on a principal component analysis of eleven neurocognitive tests, we constructed an overall neurocognitive performance (NP) score. We examined mean score differences in NP between the groups of healthy controls (HC) and ROD and between adolescents (15-21 years) and adults (22-40 years) within a GLM approach. This accounts for unbalanced data with focus on interaction effects while controlling for effects of medication and educational years. Our results show lower NP for the ROD as compared to the HC group (d = - 0.29, p = .046) and lower NP for the adolescent group as compared to the adult group (d = - 0.29; p < .039). There was no interaction between these two group effects (F = 1.11; p = .29). Our findings suggest that the detrimental effect of ROD on neurocognitive functioning is comparable in adolescent and adult patients, since lower scores in adolescent patients are explained by effects of age and education. Neurocognitive impairment is an under addressed issue in clinical treatment guidelines for adolescent MDD. We suggest efficient monitoring in clinical practice by using an aggregate of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and the Trail Making Test B, which highly correlated with the overall score of NP (r = 0.82).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02599-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02599-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨与成年患者相比,青少年首次发作重度抑郁症(新近发病抑郁症,ROD)时的神经认知缺陷。研究分析了来自 PRONIA 研究基线评估的横断面神经认知数据,样本数为 650 人(55.31% 为女性)。在对 11 项神经认知测试进行主成分分析的基础上,我们得出了神经认知表现(NP)总分。我们采用 GLM 方法研究了健康对照组(HC)和 ROD 组之间以及青少年(15-21 岁)和成人(22-40 岁)之间的 NP 平均得分差异。这种方法考虑到了不平衡数据,在控制药物和教育年限影响的同时,重点关注了交互效应。我们的结果显示,与 HC 组相比,ROD 组的 NP 较低(d = - 0.29,p = .046),与成人组相比,青少年组的 NP 较低(d = - 0.29;p = .046)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neurocognitive dysfunction in adolescents with recent onset major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional comparative study.

The aim of this study was to examine the neurocognitive deficits associated with the first episode of major depressive disorder (recent onset depression, ROD) in adolescents as compared to adult patients. Cross-sectional neurocognitive data from the baseline assessments of the PRONIA study with N = 650 (55.31% females) were analyzed. Based on a principal component analysis of eleven neurocognitive tests, we constructed an overall neurocognitive performance (NP) score. We examined mean score differences in NP between the groups of healthy controls (HC) and ROD and between adolescents (15-21 years) and adults (22-40 years) within a GLM approach. This accounts for unbalanced data with focus on interaction effects while controlling for effects of medication and educational years. Our results show lower NP for the ROD as compared to the HC group (d = - 0.29, p = .046) and lower NP for the adolescent group as compared to the adult group (d = - 0.29; p < .039). There was no interaction between these two group effects (F = 1.11; p = .29). Our findings suggest that the detrimental effect of ROD on neurocognitive functioning is comparable in adolescent and adult patients, since lower scores in adolescent patients are explained by effects of age and education. Neurocognitive impairment is an under addressed issue in clinical treatment guidelines for adolescent MDD. We suggest efficient monitoring in clinical practice by using an aggregate of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and the Trail Making Test B, which highly correlated with the overall score of NP (r = 0.82).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry is Europe''s only peer-reviewed journal entirely devoted to child and adolescent psychiatry. It aims to further a broad understanding of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Empirical research is its foundation, and clinical relevance is its hallmark. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry welcomes in particular papers covering neuropsychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, genetics, neuroimaging, pharmacology, and related fields of interest. Contributions are encouraged from all around the world.
期刊最新文献
Body size estimation is influenced by actual-ideal body size discrepancy: a series of studies among Chinese adolescent girls. Correction: Associations between academic achievement and internalizing disorders in Swedish students aged 16 years between 1990 and 2018. Psychomotor development, emotional regulation, and executive functions in 2-years-old children after threatened preterm labour: a prospective cohort study. A nomogram for predicting non-suicide self-injury in youth depression patients: a longitudinal analysis. The patient and the family: investigating parental mental health problems, family functioning, and parent involvement in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1