Mushidur Rahman, Sophie L Russell, Nduka C Okwose, Charles J Steward, Helen Maddock, Prithwish Banerjee, Djordje G Jakovljevic
{"title":"健康人的心率变异性与心脏功能超声心动图指数之间的关系。","authors":"Mushidur Rahman, Sophie L Russell, Nduka C Okwose, Charles J Steward, Helen Maddock, Prithwish Banerjee, Djordje G Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the relationship between HRV and echocardiography indices of cardiac function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy individuals (N = 30) aged 33 ± 10 years old, underwent short-term resting HRV assessment and transthoracic echocardiography with speckle tracking analysis. Time domain - (i.e. R-R interval, root mean square of successive RR interval difference (RMSSD), standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) and frequency domain-measures of HRV (i.e. high-frequency power (HF), low-frequency power (LF), high-frequency normalised (HFnorm) and low-frequency normalised (LFnorm)). Echocardiography indices of cardiac function included; Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left- and right-ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS, and RV GLS), left atrial strain: left atrial reservoir (LA<sub>res</sub>), left atrial conduit (LA<sub>con</sub>) and left atrial contraction (LA<sub>CT</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values for HRV time-domain measures were: R-R (991 ± 176 ms), SDNN (50.9 ± 21.5 ms), and RMSSD (46.8 ± 29.4 ms); and frequency-domain: LF (727 ± 606 ms<sup>2</sup>), HF (415 ± 35 ms<sup>2</sup>), LFnorm (56 ± 19.4) and HFnorm (36.5 ± 18.8). Mean values for indices of cardiac function were LVEF (59.9% ± 2.8%), LV-GLS (19.2% ± 1.4%), RV-GLS (21.7% ± 2.7%), LA<sub>res</sub> (36.8% ± 6.99%), LA<sub>con</sub> (26.2% ± 6.95%) and LA<sub>CT</sub> (12.3% ± 3.56%). There was a significant negative relationship between HF and LV-GLS (r = -0.47, p = 0.01) and RMSSD and LVEF (r = -0.39, p = 0.03) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Heart rate variability measures such as high frequency power and RMSSD are associated with left ventricle systolic function in healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between heart rate variability and echocardiography indices of cardiac function in healthy individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Mushidur Rahman, Sophie L Russell, Nduka C Okwose, Charles J Steward, Helen Maddock, Prithwish Banerjee, Djordje G Jakovljevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cpf.12910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the relationship between HRV and echocardiography indices of cardiac function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy individuals (N = 30) aged 33 ± 10 years old, underwent short-term resting HRV assessment and transthoracic echocardiography with speckle tracking analysis. Time domain - (i.e. R-R interval, root mean square of successive RR interval difference (RMSSD), standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) and frequency domain-measures of HRV (i.e. high-frequency power (HF), low-frequency power (LF), high-frequency normalised (HFnorm) and low-frequency normalised (LFnorm)). Echocardiography indices of cardiac function included; Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left- and right-ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS, and RV GLS), left atrial strain: left atrial reservoir (LA<sub>res</sub>), left atrial conduit (LA<sub>con</sub>) and left atrial contraction (LA<sub>CT</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values for HRV time-domain measures were: R-R (991 ± 176 ms), SDNN (50.9 ± 21.5 ms), and RMSSD (46.8 ± 29.4 ms); and frequency-domain: LF (727 ± 606 ms<sup>2</sup>), HF (415 ± 35 ms<sup>2</sup>), LFnorm (56 ± 19.4) and HFnorm (36.5 ± 18.8). Mean values for indices of cardiac function were LVEF (59.9% ± 2.8%), LV-GLS (19.2% ± 1.4%), RV-GLS (21.7% ± 2.7%), LA<sub>res</sub> (36.8% ± 6.99%), LA<sub>con</sub> (26.2% ± 6.95%) and LA<sub>CT</sub> (12.3% ± 3.56%). There was a significant negative relationship between HF and LV-GLS (r = -0.47, p = 0.01) and RMSSD and LVEF (r = -0.39, p = 0.03) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Heart rate variability measures such as high frequency power and RMSSD are associated with left ventricle systolic function in healthy individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12910\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12910","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between heart rate variability and echocardiography indices of cardiac function in healthy individuals.
Purpose: This study evaluated the relationship between HRV and echocardiography indices of cardiac function.
Methods: Healthy individuals (N = 30) aged 33 ± 10 years old, underwent short-term resting HRV assessment and transthoracic echocardiography with speckle tracking analysis. Time domain - (i.e. R-R interval, root mean square of successive RR interval difference (RMSSD), standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) and frequency domain-measures of HRV (i.e. high-frequency power (HF), low-frequency power (LF), high-frequency normalised (HFnorm) and low-frequency normalised (LFnorm)). Echocardiography indices of cardiac function included; Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left- and right-ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS, and RV GLS), left atrial strain: left atrial reservoir (LAres), left atrial conduit (LAcon) and left atrial contraction (LACT).
Results: The mean values for HRV time-domain measures were: R-R (991 ± 176 ms), SDNN (50.9 ± 21.5 ms), and RMSSD (46.8 ± 29.4 ms); and frequency-domain: LF (727 ± 606 ms2), HF (415 ± 35 ms2), LFnorm (56 ± 19.4) and HFnorm (36.5 ± 18.8). Mean values for indices of cardiac function were LVEF (59.9% ± 2.8%), LV-GLS (19.2% ± 1.4%), RV-GLS (21.7% ± 2.7%), LAres (36.8% ± 6.99%), LAcon (26.2% ± 6.95%) and LACT (12.3% ± 3.56%). There was a significant negative relationship between HF and LV-GLS (r = -0.47, p = 0.01) and RMSSD and LVEF (r = -0.39, p = 0.03) respectively.
Conclusion: Heart rate variability measures such as high frequency power and RMSSD are associated with left ventricle systolic function in healthy individuals.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest.
Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
