大肠杆菌 Nissle 1917 与糖的结合对肠道微生物群的调节:一项使用无宿主系统的试验研究,反映了对人际微生物群的影响。

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2024.1452784
Kiran Heer, Manpreet Kaur, Dwinder Sidhu, Priyankar Dey, Saumya Raychaudhuri
{"title":"大肠杆菌 Nissle 1917 与糖的结合对肠道微生物群的调节:一项使用无宿主系统的试验研究,反映了对人际微生物群的影响。","authors":"Kiran Heer, Manpreet Kaur, Dwinder Sidhu, Priyankar Dey, Saumya Raychaudhuri","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1452784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The differential effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic formulations on human health are dictated by the inter-individual gut microbial profile. The effects of probiotics such as <i>Escherichia coli</i> Nissle 1917 (ECN) on gut microbiota may vary according to the microbiome profiles of individuals and may be influenced by the presence of certain carbohydrates, which can impact microbial community structure and treatment results.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Processed fecal samples from donors having contrasting lifestyles, dietary patterns, and disease histories were mixed with 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL ECN with or without 1% (w/v) sugars (glucose, galactose, or rice starch) in a host-free system. Post-incubation, 16 s rRNA sequencing was performed. Microbial diversity and taxonomic abundance were computed in relation to the probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic treatment effects and interpersonal microbiome variance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Baseline gut microbial profiles showed significant inter-individual variations. ECN treatment alone had a limited impact on the inter-personal gut microbial diversity and abundance. Prebiotics caused a substantial enrichment in Actinobacteria, but there were differences in the responses at the order and genus levels, with enrichment shown in <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, <i>Collinsella</i>, and <i>Megasphaera</i>. Subject B exhibited enrichment in Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria, but subject A showed more diversified taxonomic alterations as a consequence of the synbiotic treatments. Despite negligible difference in the <i>α</i>-diversity, probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic treatments independently resulted in distinct segregation in microbial communities at the <i>β</i>-diversity level. The core microbiota was altered only under prebiotic and synbiotic treatment. Significant correlations primarily for minor phyla were identified under prebiotic and synbiotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interindividual microbiome composition strongly influences the effectiveness of personalized diet and treatment plans. The responsiveness to dietary strategies varies according to individual microbiome profiles influenced by health, diet, and lifestyle. Therefore, tailored approaches that consider individual microbiome compositions are crucial for maximizing gut health and treatment results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"11 ","pages":"1452784"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modulation of gut microbiome in response to the combination of <i>Escherichia coli</i> Nissle 1917 and sugars: a pilot study using host-free system reflecting impact on interpersonal microbiome.\",\"authors\":\"Kiran Heer, Manpreet Kaur, Dwinder Sidhu, Priyankar Dey, Saumya Raychaudhuri\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2024.1452784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The differential effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic formulations on human health are dictated by the inter-individual gut microbial profile. The effects of probiotics such as <i>Escherichia coli</i> Nissle 1917 (ECN) on gut microbiota may vary according to the microbiome profiles of individuals and may be influenced by the presence of certain carbohydrates, which can impact microbial community structure and treatment results.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Processed fecal samples from donors having contrasting lifestyles, dietary patterns, and disease histories were mixed with 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL ECN with or without 1% (w/v) sugars (glucose, galactose, or rice starch) in a host-free system. Post-incubation, 16 s rRNA sequencing was performed. Microbial diversity and taxonomic abundance were computed in relation to the probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic treatment effects and interpersonal microbiome variance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Baseline gut microbial profiles showed significant inter-individual variations. ECN treatment alone had a limited impact on the inter-personal gut microbial diversity and abundance. Prebiotics caused a substantial enrichment in Actinobacteria, but there were differences in the responses at the order and genus levels, with enrichment shown in <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, <i>Collinsella</i>, and <i>Megasphaera</i>. Subject B exhibited enrichment in Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria, but subject A showed more diversified taxonomic alterations as a consequence of the synbiotic treatments. Despite negligible difference in the <i>α</i>-diversity, probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic treatments independently resulted in distinct segregation in microbial communities at the <i>β</i>-diversity level. The core microbiota was altered only under prebiotic and synbiotic treatment. Significant correlations primarily for minor phyla were identified under prebiotic and synbiotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interindividual microbiome composition strongly influences the effectiveness of personalized diet and treatment plans. The responsiveness to dietary strategies varies according to individual microbiome profiles influenced by health, diet, and lifestyle. Therefore, tailored approaches that consider individual microbiome compositions are crucial for maximizing gut health and treatment results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1452784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1452784\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1452784","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:益生菌、益生菌和合成益生菌配方对人体健康的不同影响取决于个体间的肠道微生物特征。益生菌(如大肠埃希氏菌 Nissle 1917(ECN))对肠道微生物群的影响可能因个体的微生物群特征而异,也可能受某些碳水化合物的影响,从而影响微生物群落结构和治疗效果:方法:在无宿主系统中,将具有不同生活方式、饮食模式和疾病史的供体的粪便样本与 5 × 106 CFU/mL ECN(含或不含 1%(w/v)糖类(葡萄糖、半乳糖或大米淀粉))混合。培养后,进行 16 s rRNA 测序。计算微生物多样性和分类丰度与益生菌、益生元和合成益生元处理效果以及人际微生物组变异的关系:结果:基线肠道微生物图谱显示出显著的个体间差异。单独使用 ECN 对个体间肠道微生物多样性和丰度的影响有限。益生元使放线菌大量富集,但在菌目和菌属水平上的反应存在差异,双歧杆菌、柯林斯菌和 Megasphaera 出现富集。受试者 B 表现出对变形菌和蓝细菌的富集,但受试者 A 在合成生物处理后表现出更多样化的分类改变。尽管α-多样性的差异微乎其微,但益生菌、益生菌和合成益生菌处理在β-多样性水平上分别导致了不同的微生物群落分离。只有益生菌和合成益生菌处理才改变了核心微生物群。在益生菌和合成益生菌处理过程中,发现了主要针对小系统的显著相关性:结论:个体间微生物组的组成对个性化饮食和治疗方案的效果有很大影响。受健康、饮食和生活方式影响的个体微生物组特征不同,对饮食策略的反应也不同。因此,考虑个体微生物组组成的定制方法对于最大限度地提高肠道健康和治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modulation of gut microbiome in response to the combination of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and sugars: a pilot study using host-free system reflecting impact on interpersonal microbiome.

Introduction: The differential effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic formulations on human health are dictated by the inter-individual gut microbial profile. The effects of probiotics such as Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (ECN) on gut microbiota may vary according to the microbiome profiles of individuals and may be influenced by the presence of certain carbohydrates, which can impact microbial community structure and treatment results.

Method: Processed fecal samples from donors having contrasting lifestyles, dietary patterns, and disease histories were mixed with 5 × 106 CFU/mL ECN with or without 1% (w/v) sugars (glucose, galactose, or rice starch) in a host-free system. Post-incubation, 16 s rRNA sequencing was performed. Microbial diversity and taxonomic abundance were computed in relation to the probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic treatment effects and interpersonal microbiome variance.

Result: Baseline gut microbial profiles showed significant inter-individual variations. ECN treatment alone had a limited impact on the inter-personal gut microbial diversity and abundance. Prebiotics caused a substantial enrichment in Actinobacteria, but there were differences in the responses at the order and genus levels, with enrichment shown in Bifidobacterium, Collinsella, and Megasphaera. Subject B exhibited enrichment in Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria, but subject A showed more diversified taxonomic alterations as a consequence of the synbiotic treatments. Despite negligible difference in the α-diversity, probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic treatments independently resulted in distinct segregation in microbial communities at the β-diversity level. The core microbiota was altered only under prebiotic and synbiotic treatment. Significant correlations primarily for minor phyla were identified under prebiotic and synbiotic treatment.

Conclusion: The interindividual microbiome composition strongly influences the effectiveness of personalized diet and treatment plans. The responsiveness to dietary strategies varies according to individual microbiome profiles influenced by health, diet, and lifestyle. Therefore, tailored approaches that consider individual microbiome compositions are crucial for maximizing gut health and treatment results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
期刊最新文献
Association between ideal cardiovascular health and bowel conditions among US adults. Association between serum carotenoids and hyperuricemia: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2001-2006. Editorial: Meat packaging and preservation: application of green nanoparticles and other bio-preservatives. How hand-made affects consumers' perceived nutritional quality of organic food. Impact of a virtual antenatal intervention for improved diet and iron intake in Kapilvastu district, Nepal - the VALID randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1