{"title":"A 型乳腺癌保乳手术后放弃放疗:LUMINA研究","authors":"Alison Laws, Muriel Brackstone, May Lynn Quan","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The modern generation of trials evaluating the role of adjuvant radiation have turned to genomic profiling as a further risk stratification tool. The LUMINA trial by Whelan et al, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, applied Ki67 testing to identify those with luminal A disease and evaluated locoregional outcomes with Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and endocrine therapy (ET) alone. This paper was reviewed at the Canadian Association of General Surgeons' \"Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery\" (EBRS) webinar series. Here, we present the EBRS panel's methodologic review and clinical commentary. The LUMINA study demonstrated very low rates of Local Recurrence (LR) in low-risk patients with luminal A biologic subtype treated with BCS and ET alone without radiation. While the LUMINA study was rigorously designed and executed, there are significant pragmatic limitations to the implementation of the proposed approach using their protocol. We advocate that there is no \"one size fits all\" approach to early ER+ breast cancer. Choice of treatment strategy should strongly consider patient goals and preferences, with need for incorporation of Quality of Life and patient-reported endpoints into future studies evaluating this population to help guide these nuanced decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omitting Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery in Luminal A Breast Cancer: The LUMINA Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Laws, Muriel Brackstone, May Lynn Quan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The modern generation of trials evaluating the role of adjuvant radiation have turned to genomic profiling as a further risk stratification tool. The LUMINA trial by Whelan et al, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, applied Ki67 testing to identify those with luminal A disease and evaluated locoregional outcomes with Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and endocrine therapy (ET) alone. This paper was reviewed at the Canadian Association of General Surgeons' \\\"Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery\\\" (EBRS) webinar series. Here, we present the EBRS panel's methodologic review and clinical commentary. The LUMINA study demonstrated very low rates of Local Recurrence (LR) in low-risk patients with luminal A biologic subtype treated with BCS and ET alone without radiation. While the LUMINA study was rigorously designed and executed, there are significant pragmatic limitations to the implementation of the proposed approach using their protocol. We advocate that there is no \\\"one size fits all\\\" approach to early ER+ breast cancer. Choice of treatment strategy should strongly consider patient goals and preferences, with need for incorporation of Quality of Life and patient-reported endpoints into future studies evaluating this population to help guide these nuanced decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
新一代评估辅助放射作用的试验已转向基因组分析,将其作为进一步的风险分层工具。惠兰等人在《新英格兰医学杂志》(New England Journal of Medicine)上发表的 LUMINA 试验应用 Ki67 检测来识别管腔 A 型疾病患者,并评估了保乳手术(BCS)和单纯内分泌治疗(ET)的局部疗效。加拿大普通外科医生协会的 "外科循证审查"(EBRS)系列网络研讨会对这篇论文进行了审查。在此,我们将介绍 EBRS 小组的方法学审查和临床评论。LUMINA 研究表明,在接受 BCS 和 ET 单独治疗而不接受放射治疗的腔道 A 生物亚型低风险患者中,局部复发(LR)率非常低。虽然 LUMINA 研究的设计和实施都很严谨,但使用其方案实施所建议的方法存在很大的实际局限性。我们主张,早期ER+乳腺癌没有 "放之四海而皆准 "的治疗方法。在选择治疗策略时,应充分考虑患者的目标和偏好,并在未来评估该人群的研究中纳入生活质量和患者报告终点,以帮助指导这些微妙的决策。
Omitting Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery in Luminal A Breast Cancer: The LUMINA Study.
The modern generation of trials evaluating the role of adjuvant radiation have turned to genomic profiling as a further risk stratification tool. The LUMINA trial by Whelan et al, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, applied Ki67 testing to identify those with luminal A disease and evaluated locoregional outcomes with Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and endocrine therapy (ET) alone. This paper was reviewed at the Canadian Association of General Surgeons' "Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery" (EBRS) webinar series. Here, we present the EBRS panel's methodologic review and clinical commentary. The LUMINA study demonstrated very low rates of Local Recurrence (LR) in low-risk patients with luminal A biologic subtype treated with BCS and ET alone without radiation. While the LUMINA study was rigorously designed and executed, there are significant pragmatic limitations to the implementation of the proposed approach using their protocol. We advocate that there is no "one size fits all" approach to early ER+ breast cancer. Choice of treatment strategy should strongly consider patient goals and preferences, with need for incorporation of Quality of Life and patient-reported endpoints into future studies evaluating this population to help guide these nuanced decisions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.