脂肪测量能否增强甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对美国成年人代谢综合征的预测能力?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity research & clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orcp.2024.11.001
Alaina C. Glasgow , Andrew R. Heckel , Wonhee Cho, Joon Young Kim
{"title":"脂肪测量能否增强甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对美国成年人代谢综合征的预测能力?","authors":"Alaina C. Glasgow ,&nbsp;Andrew R. Heckel ,&nbsp;Wonhee Cho,&nbsp;Joon Young Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.orcp.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Insulin resistance is a hallmark feature of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn). The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is considered a reliable surrogate measure of insulin resistance. However, the efficacy of the TyG-index combined with adiposity measures for identifying MetSyn in U.S. adults is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the present cross-sectional study, 2746 men and women from the 2017–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with physical and laboratory characteristics were included. Predictive powers (estimated by the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic [ROC-AUC]) of TyG-index combined with adiposity for MetSyn were compared with other traditional surrogate markers of insulin resistance including the TyG index, homeostatic assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), 1/fasting insulin, and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Predictive power of TyG-WHtR (ROC-AUC: 0.875) for MetSyn was highest, followed by TyG-WC (0.866), TyG-BMI (0.845), TyG index (0.832), HOMA-IR (0.820), QUICKI (0.820) and 1/fasting insulin (0.786). TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC showed significantly higher ROC-AUCs compared with TyG-index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>TyG index combined with adiposity metrics is more effective in predicting MetSyn when compared to insulin resistance surrogates (TyG index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI) which has been widely used in large cohort observational studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19408,"journal":{"name":"Obesity research & clinical practice","volume":"18 5","pages":"Pages 343-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can adiposity measures enhance the predictive power of the triglyceride-glucose index for metabolic syndrome in adults in the United States?\",\"authors\":\"Alaina C. Glasgow ,&nbsp;Andrew R. Heckel ,&nbsp;Wonhee Cho,&nbsp;Joon Young Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orcp.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Insulin resistance is a hallmark feature of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn). The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is considered a reliable surrogate measure of insulin resistance. However, the efficacy of the TyG-index combined with adiposity measures for identifying MetSyn in U.S. adults is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the present cross-sectional study, 2746 men and women from the 2017–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with physical and laboratory characteristics were included. Predictive powers (estimated by the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic [ROC-AUC]) of TyG-index combined with adiposity for MetSyn were compared with other traditional surrogate markers of insulin resistance including the TyG index, homeostatic assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), 1/fasting insulin, and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Predictive power of TyG-WHtR (ROC-AUC: 0.875) for MetSyn was highest, followed by TyG-WC (0.866), TyG-BMI (0.845), TyG index (0.832), HOMA-IR (0.820), QUICKI (0.820) and 1/fasting insulin (0.786). TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC showed significantly higher ROC-AUCs compared with TyG-index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>TyG index combined with adiposity metrics is more effective in predicting MetSyn when compared to insulin resistance surrogates (TyG index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI) which has been widely used in large cohort observational studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity research & clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 343-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity research & clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871403X24003946\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity research & clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871403X24003946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰岛素抵抗是代谢综合征(MetSyn)的标志性特征:胰岛素抵抗是代谢综合征(MetSyn)的标志性特征。甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数被认为是胰岛素抵抗的可靠替代指标。然而,TyG 指数与脂肪测量相结合对识别美国成年人 MetSyn 的有效性尚不清楚:在本横断面研究中,纳入了 2017-2020 年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)中具有体格和实验室特征的 2746 名男性和女性。研究人员将TyG指数结合脂肪率对MetSyn的预测能力(通过接收器操作特征曲线下面积[ROC-AUC]估算)与其他传统的胰岛素抵抗替代标记物进行了比较,包括TyG指数、胰岛素抵抗的稳态评估(HOMA-IR)、1/空腹胰岛素和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI):结果:TyG-WHtR对MetSyn的预测能力最高(ROC-AUC:0.875),其次是TyG-WC(0.866)、TyG-BMI(0.845)、TyG指数(0.832)、HOMA-IR(0.820)、QUICKI(0.820)和1/空腹胰岛素(0.786)。与TyG指数、HOMA-IR、1/空腹胰岛素和QUICKI相比,TyG-WHtR和TyG-WC的ROC-AUCs明显更高(P≤0.001):与胰岛素抵抗代用指标(TyG指数、HOMA-IR、1/空腹胰岛素和QUICKI)相比,TyG指数结合脂肪指标能更有效地预测MetSyn。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can adiposity measures enhance the predictive power of the triglyceride-glucose index for metabolic syndrome in adults in the United States?

Background

Insulin resistance is a hallmark feature of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn). The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is considered a reliable surrogate measure of insulin resistance. However, the efficacy of the TyG-index combined with adiposity measures for identifying MetSyn in U.S. adults is unknown.

Methods

In the present cross-sectional study, 2746 men and women from the 2017–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with physical and laboratory characteristics were included. Predictive powers (estimated by the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic [ROC-AUC]) of TyG-index combined with adiposity for MetSyn were compared with other traditional surrogate markers of insulin resistance including the TyG index, homeostatic assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), 1/fasting insulin, and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI).

Results

Predictive power of TyG-WHtR (ROC-AUC: 0.875) for MetSyn was highest, followed by TyG-WC (0.866), TyG-BMI (0.845), TyG index (0.832), HOMA-IR (0.820), QUICKI (0.820) and 1/fasting insulin (0.786). TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC showed significantly higher ROC-AUCs compared with TyG-index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

TyG index combined with adiposity metrics is more effective in predicting MetSyn when compared to insulin resistance surrogates (TyG index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI) which has been widely used in large cohort observational studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity research & clinical practice
Obesity research & clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Obesity Research & Clinical Practice (ORCP) is to publish high quality clinical and basic research relating to the epidemiology, mechanism, complications and treatment of obesity and the complication of obesity. Studies relating to the Asia Oceania region are particularly welcome, given the increasing burden of obesity in Asia Pacific, compounded by specific regional population-based and genetic issues, and the devastating personal and economic consequences. The journal aims to expose health care practitioners, clinical researchers, basic scientists, epidemiologists, and public health officials in the region to all areas of obesity research and practice. In addition to original research the ORCP publishes reviews, patient reports, short communications, and letters to the editor (including comments on published papers). The proceedings and abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Asia Oceania Association for the Study of Obesity is published as a supplement each year.
期刊最新文献
Is single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (SADI) an effective option for conversional surgery following sleeve gastrectomy? A comprehensive review and revised scope of current literature Effects of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring on body weight and glycemic variability in individuals with overweight and impaired glucose tolerance or mild diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial Evaluating osteopontin as a biomarker of obesity related complications before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Insights into diet, psychological distress, and personality traits among patients with lower-extremity lymphedema and overweight/obesity in comparison to patients with lifestyle-induced overweight/obesity and patients with normal body weight Influence of waist circumference measurement site on the cardiometabolic risk factors in Korean adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1