Herleen Rai, Kyle Forsythe, Nyle Smith, Heather Smetana, Melissa A Neally, Christi Marshall, Ivo M B Francischetti, Paul M Ness, Evan M Bloch, Aaron A R Tobian, Elizabeth P Crowe
{"title":"将分离血小板作为库存短缺的应急措施。","authors":"Herleen Rai, Kyle Forsythe, Nyle Smith, Heather Smetana, Melissa A Neally, Christi Marshall, Ivo M B Francischetti, Paul M Ness, Evan M Bloch, Aaron A R Tobian, Elizabeth P Crowe","doi":"10.1111/trf.18055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Splitting apheresis platelet (PLT) units increase available inventory during shortages. The impact of prolonged storage in gas-impermeable aliquot bags on PLT quality in vitro and transfusion outcomes in patients remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We assessed in vitro PLT quality and thromboelastography (TEG) in PLTs stored for 8 or 24 h in aliquot bags compared with baseline (T0). Retrospective assessment of response (PLT increment and corrected count increment (CCI)) was conducted among adults (≥18 years) transfused with split platelet units from January 2021 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed in PLT and white blood cell (WBC) counts, mean platelet volume, or TEG parameters during storage, except for an increase in TEG R time (mean ± SD) at 24 h (6.1 ± 0.5 min) compared to T0 (4.4 ± 0.8 min), p = 0.0031 one-way ANOVA. Eighty-one patients were transfused 119 split units with a median [IQR] PLT yield of 2.1 × 10<sup>11</sup>[1.9 × 10<sup>11</sup> to 2.3 × 10<sup>11</sup>] and storage duration of 1.6[0.7-9.1] h. The overall median PLT count increment was 6.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>/uL and CCI was 5.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>, correlating negatively with split unit storage duration (Spearman rho = -0.218, p = 0.017). Compared with split transfusions of pathogen-reduced (PR) PLTs, non-PR splits were associated with higher median platelet count increments (7.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL vs. 4.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL, p = 0.0263 Mann-Whitney U) and higher CCIs (6.5 × 10<sup>3</sup> vs. 3.9 × 10<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.0116 Mann-Whitney U) despite no differences in PLT yields (2.1 × 10<sup>11</sup>/μL vs. 2.1 × 10<sup>11</sup>/μL).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Storing PLTs in aliquot bags for 8 or 24 h does not adversely affect their quality in vitro. Splitting apheresis PLTs are feasible for adult transfusions during shortages. It may be advisable to prioritize non-PR PLTs for splitting given improved patient responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Splitting apheresis platelets as a contingency measure for inventory shortages.\",\"authors\":\"Herleen Rai, Kyle Forsythe, Nyle Smith, Heather Smetana, Melissa A Neally, Christi Marshall, Ivo M B Francischetti, Paul M Ness, Evan M Bloch, Aaron A R Tobian, Elizabeth P Crowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Splitting apheresis platelet (PLT) units increase available inventory during shortages. The impact of prolonged storage in gas-impermeable aliquot bags on PLT quality in vitro and transfusion outcomes in patients remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We assessed in vitro PLT quality and thromboelastography (TEG) in PLTs stored for 8 or 24 h in aliquot bags compared with baseline (T0). Retrospective assessment of response (PLT increment and corrected count increment (CCI)) was conducted among adults (≥18 years) transfused with split platelet units from January 2021 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed in PLT and white blood cell (WBC) counts, mean platelet volume, or TEG parameters during storage, except for an increase in TEG R time (mean ± SD) at 24 h (6.1 ± 0.5 min) compared to T0 (4.4 ± 0.8 min), p = 0.0031 one-way ANOVA. Eighty-one patients were transfused 119 split units with a median [IQR] PLT yield of 2.1 × 10<sup>11</sup>[1.9 × 10<sup>11</sup> to 2.3 × 10<sup>11</sup>] and storage duration of 1.6[0.7-9.1] h. The overall median PLT count increment was 6.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>/uL and CCI was 5.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>, correlating negatively with split unit storage duration (Spearman rho = -0.218, p = 0.017). Compared with split transfusions of pathogen-reduced (PR) PLTs, non-PR splits were associated with higher median platelet count increments (7.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL vs. 4.0 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL, p = 0.0263 Mann-Whitney U) and higher CCIs (6.5 × 10<sup>3</sup> vs. 3.9 × 10<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.0116 Mann-Whitney U) despite no differences in PLT yields (2.1 × 10<sup>11</sup>/μL vs. 2.1 × 10<sup>11</sup>/μL).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Storing PLTs in aliquot bags for 8 or 24 h does not adversely affect their quality in vitro. Splitting apheresis PLTs are feasible for adult transfusions during shortages. It may be advisable to prioritize non-PR PLTs for splitting given improved patient responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Splitting apheresis platelets as a contingency measure for inventory shortages.
Background: Splitting apheresis platelet (PLT) units increase available inventory during shortages. The impact of prolonged storage in gas-impermeable aliquot bags on PLT quality in vitro and transfusion outcomes in patients remains uncertain.
Study design and methods: We assessed in vitro PLT quality and thromboelastography (TEG) in PLTs stored for 8 or 24 h in aliquot bags compared with baseline (T0). Retrospective assessment of response (PLT increment and corrected count increment (CCI)) was conducted among adults (≥18 years) transfused with split platelet units from January 2021 to June 2022.
Results: No differences were observed in PLT and white blood cell (WBC) counts, mean platelet volume, or TEG parameters during storage, except for an increase in TEG R time (mean ± SD) at 24 h (6.1 ± 0.5 min) compared to T0 (4.4 ± 0.8 min), p = 0.0031 one-way ANOVA. Eighty-one patients were transfused 119 split units with a median [IQR] PLT yield of 2.1 × 1011[1.9 × 1011 to 2.3 × 1011] and storage duration of 1.6[0.7-9.1] h. The overall median PLT count increment was 6.0 × 103/uL and CCI was 5.0 × 103, correlating negatively with split unit storage duration (Spearman rho = -0.218, p = 0.017). Compared with split transfusions of pathogen-reduced (PR) PLTs, non-PR splits were associated with higher median platelet count increments (7.0 × 103/μL vs. 4.0 × 103/μL, p = 0.0263 Mann-Whitney U) and higher CCIs (6.5 × 103 vs. 3.9 × 103, p = 0.0116 Mann-Whitney U) despite no differences in PLT yields (2.1 × 1011/μL vs. 2.1 × 1011/μL).
Discussion: Storing PLTs in aliquot bags for 8 or 24 h does not adversely affect their quality in vitro. Splitting apheresis PLTs are feasible for adult transfusions during shortages. It may be advisable to prioritize non-PR PLTs for splitting given improved patient responses.
期刊介绍:
TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.