{"title":"[民主德国的有组织虐待--受害者视角的二次分析]。","authors":"Philipp Laue, Bernhard Strauß","doi":"10.1055/a-2422-0496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Organiszed abuse (OA) is a form of long-lasting, mostly sexualized violence against children, youth, or women by networked perpetrators for financial and power-related enrichment. Individual reports and historical analyses imply this violence could have taken place in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This study is the first to shed light on OA in the GDR from the perspective of those affected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N=10 confidential hearings and written reports of victims of sexualized violence in childhood and adolescence in the GDR, which were made available by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in Germany, were analyzed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OA was described with multiple forms of sexualized, physical and psychological violence. Those affected place OA in different contexts, with other categories (perpetrators, duration/frequency of violence, motives) sometimes dependent on these. The consequences for victims are both short- and long-term in nature and occur on both health (especially psychopathological) and psychosocial levels up to the present. There were no indications of further GDR-specific characteristics of OA.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reports of victims enable the perspective of \"experienced knowledge\", which has its limit where descriptions presuppose the knowledge of perpetrators (e. g., motives for violence, characteristics of violence structure). Possible political-ideological features of violence could not be discussed due to considering OA as an \"ideology-free\" phenomenon (in contrast to e. g. ritual abuse). In addition to definitional distinctions between different phenomena of violence, a multiperspective and multiprofessional approach is necessary to guarantee a historically sensitive continuation of research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":" ","pages":"9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Organised abuse in the GDR - A Secondary Analysis of the Victims' Perspective].\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Laue, Bernhard Strauß\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2422-0496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Organiszed abuse (OA) is a form of long-lasting, mostly sexualized violence against children, youth, or women by networked perpetrators for financial and power-related enrichment. Individual reports and historical analyses imply this violence could have taken place in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This study is the first to shed light on OA in the GDR from the perspective of those affected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N=10 confidential hearings and written reports of victims of sexualized violence in childhood and adolescence in the GDR, which were made available by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in Germany, were analyzed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OA was described with multiple forms of sexualized, physical and psychological violence. Those affected place OA in different contexts, with other categories (perpetrators, duration/frequency of violence, motives) sometimes dependent on these. The consequences for victims are both short- and long-term in nature and occur on both health (especially psychopathological) and psychosocial levels up to the present. There were no indications of further GDR-specific characteristics of OA.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reports of victims enable the perspective of \\\"experienced knowledge\\\", which has its limit where descriptions presuppose the knowledge of perpetrators (e. g., motives for violence, characteristics of violence structure). Possible political-ideological features of violence could not be discussed due to considering OA as an \\\"ideology-free\\\" phenomenon (in contrast to e. g. ritual abuse). In addition to definitional distinctions between different phenomena of violence, a multiperspective and multiprofessional approach is necessary to guarantee a historically sensitive continuation of research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723796/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2422-0496\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2422-0496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:有组织虐待(OA)是一种长期存在的暴力形式,主要是网络犯罪者为获得经济和权力利益而对儿童、青年或妇女实施的性暴力。个人报告和历史分析表明,这种暴力行为可能发生在德意志民主共和国(GDR)。本研究首次从受影响者的角度揭示了民主德国的 OA 问题:采用内容结构化定性内容分析法,对德国儿童性虐待独立调查组提供的民主德国童年和青少年时期性暴力受害者的保密听证会和书面报告(10 份)进行了分析:对 OA 的描述包括多种形式的性暴力、身体暴力和心理暴力。受影响者将 OA 置于不同的背景中,其他类别(施暴者、暴力持续时间/频率、动机)有时取决于这些背景。对受害者造成的后果既有短期的,也有长期的,既有健康方面的(特别是精神病理方面的),也有社会心理方面的,直到现在。没有迹象表明 OA 具有其他民主德国特有的特征:讨论:受害者的报告提供了 "经验知识 "的视角,但这种视角有其局限性,因为描述的前提是对施暴者的了解(如暴力动机、暴力结构的特点)。由于将 OA 视为 "无意识形态 "现象(与仪式虐待等不同),因此无法讨论暴力可能具有的政治意识形态特征。除了从定义上区分不同的暴力现象外,还必须采取多角度和多专业的方法,以保证研究工作能继续保持对历史的敏感性。
[Organised abuse in the GDR - A Secondary Analysis of the Victims' Perspective].
Objective: Organiszed abuse (OA) is a form of long-lasting, mostly sexualized violence against children, youth, or women by networked perpetrators for financial and power-related enrichment. Individual reports and historical analyses imply this violence could have taken place in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This study is the first to shed light on OA in the GDR from the perspective of those affected.
Methods: N=10 confidential hearings and written reports of victims of sexualized violence in childhood and adolescence in the GDR, which were made available by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in Germany, were analyzed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.
Results: OA was described with multiple forms of sexualized, physical and psychological violence. Those affected place OA in different contexts, with other categories (perpetrators, duration/frequency of violence, motives) sometimes dependent on these. The consequences for victims are both short- and long-term in nature and occur on both health (especially psychopathological) and psychosocial levels up to the present. There were no indications of further GDR-specific characteristics of OA.
Discussion: The reports of victims enable the perspective of "experienced knowledge", which has its limit where descriptions presuppose the knowledge of perpetrators (e. g., motives for violence, characteristics of violence structure). Possible political-ideological features of violence could not be discussed due to considering OA as an "ideology-free" phenomenon (in contrast to e. g. ritual abuse). In addition to definitional distinctions between different phenomena of violence, a multiperspective and multiprofessional approach is necessary to guarantee a historically sensitive continuation of research.