Elizabeth Hoon, Jessie Edwards, Philip Robinson, Debra Rowett, Nigel Stocks, Helen I Keen, Catherine L Hill
{"title":"痛风目前是如何治疗的?一项定性探索性研究。","authors":"Elizabeth Hoon, Jessie Edwards, Philip Robinson, Debra Rowett, Nigel Stocks, Helen I Keen, Catherine L Hill","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-09-23-6980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to understand how gout is currently managed in Australian primary care and to assess the level of interest in changing the delivery of care for gout.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This pragmatic qualitative study was conducted among Australian general practitioners (GPs), pharmacists and adults living with gout. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The key theme identified was that chronic gout has low priority compared to managing other conditions, and management is often responsive to patient action. Lack of confidence was expressed about medication regimens for multimorbidities. Regarding changing care delivery, there was widespread interest in enhancing pharmacists' role in providing medication reviews and guidance, but there were conflicting views between some pharmacists and GPs about clinical decisions and prescribing arrangements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Interpreting findings based on Wagner's chronic care model, it is apparent that there are multiple potential opportunities to change practice that might improve gout management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"53 11","pages":"864-871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is gout currently managed, and is there interest in changing the way we deliver care? A qualitative exploratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Hoon, Jessie Edwards, Philip Robinson, Debra Rowett, Nigel Stocks, Helen I Keen, Catherine L Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-09-23-6980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to understand how gout is currently managed in Australian primary care and to assess the level of interest in changing the delivery of care for gout.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This pragmatic qualitative study was conducted among Australian general practitioners (GPs), pharmacists and adults living with gout. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The key theme identified was that chronic gout has low priority compared to managing other conditions, and management is often responsive to patient action. Lack of confidence was expressed about medication regimens for multimorbidities. Regarding changing care delivery, there was widespread interest in enhancing pharmacists' role in providing medication reviews and guidance, but there were conflicting views between some pharmacists and GPs about clinical decisions and prescribing arrangements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Interpreting findings based on Wagner's chronic care model, it is apparent that there are multiple potential opportunities to change practice that might improve gout management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"53 11\",\"pages\":\"864-871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-09-23-6980\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-09-23-6980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How is gout currently managed, and is there interest in changing the way we deliver care? A qualitative exploratory study.
Background and objectives: This study aimed to understand how gout is currently managed in Australian primary care and to assess the level of interest in changing the delivery of care for gout.
Method: This pragmatic qualitative study was conducted among Australian general practitioners (GPs), pharmacists and adults living with gout. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: The key theme identified was that chronic gout has low priority compared to managing other conditions, and management is often responsive to patient action. Lack of confidence was expressed about medication regimens for multimorbidities. Regarding changing care delivery, there was widespread interest in enhancing pharmacists' role in providing medication reviews and guidance, but there were conflicting views between some pharmacists and GPs about clinical decisions and prescribing arrangements.
Discussion: Interpreting findings based on Wagner's chronic care model, it is apparent that there are multiple potential opportunities to change practice that might improve gout management.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.