Danijela Vidaković , Ntambwe Albert Serge Mayombo , Andrea Burfeid Castellanos , Michael Kloster , Bánk Beszteri
{"title":"将硅藻代谢标定作为评估多瑙河两大支流水质的工具","authors":"Danijela Vidaković , Ntambwe Albert Serge Mayombo , Andrea Burfeid Castellanos , Michael Kloster , Bánk Beszteri","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the effectiveness of digital microscopic and molecular analysis (<em>rbcL</em> and 18S markers) in assessing diatom community composition and water quality in two international rivers (Sava and Tisa rivers). Also, two different approaches were applied for calculating diatom indices: based on the relative abundance of taxa and the presence/absence of taxa. The <em>rbcL</em> marker showed up as a more suitable choice for providing a comprehensive view of the diatom community compared to 18S, which can be partly attributed to variations in the coverage of reference databases. Furthermore, both morphological and molecular analysis pointed out statistically different ecological statuses of investigated rivers. Diatom indices derived from molecular data indicated one or two classes of lower ecological status than those based on morphological analysis. However, the average diatom indices derived from molecular presence/absence data were higher than those based on the relative abundance of taxa. After summarizing all the results, we can recommend using the <em>rbcL</em> marker with taxa presence/absence data for routine monitoring of large lowland rivers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 112793"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diatom metabarcoding as a tool to assess the water quality of two large tributaries of the Danube River\",\"authors\":\"Danijela Vidaković , Ntambwe Albert Serge Mayombo , Andrea Burfeid Castellanos , Michael Kloster , Bánk Beszteri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the effectiveness of digital microscopic and molecular analysis (<em>rbcL</em> and 18S markers) in assessing diatom community composition and water quality in two international rivers (Sava and Tisa rivers). Also, two different approaches were applied for calculating diatom indices: based on the relative abundance of taxa and the presence/absence of taxa. The <em>rbcL</em> marker showed up as a more suitable choice for providing a comprehensive view of the diatom community compared to 18S, which can be partly attributed to variations in the coverage of reference databases. Furthermore, both morphological and molecular analysis pointed out statistically different ecological statuses of investigated rivers. Diatom indices derived from molecular data indicated one or two classes of lower ecological status than those based on morphological analysis. However, the average diatom indices derived from molecular presence/absence data were higher than those based on the relative abundance of taxa. After summarizing all the results, we can recommend using the <em>rbcL</em> marker with taxa presence/absence data for routine monitoring of large lowland rivers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012500\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diatom metabarcoding as a tool to assess the water quality of two large tributaries of the Danube River
This study examines the effectiveness of digital microscopic and molecular analysis (rbcL and 18S markers) in assessing diatom community composition and water quality in two international rivers (Sava and Tisa rivers). Also, two different approaches were applied for calculating diatom indices: based on the relative abundance of taxa and the presence/absence of taxa. The rbcL marker showed up as a more suitable choice for providing a comprehensive view of the diatom community compared to 18S, which can be partly attributed to variations in the coverage of reference databases. Furthermore, both morphological and molecular analysis pointed out statistically different ecological statuses of investigated rivers. Diatom indices derived from molecular data indicated one or two classes of lower ecological status than those based on morphological analysis. However, the average diatom indices derived from molecular presence/absence data were higher than those based on the relative abundance of taxa. After summarizing all the results, we can recommend using the rbcL marker with taxa presence/absence data for routine monitoring of large lowland rivers.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.