沙特阿拉伯皮肤科诊所接受面部填充美容手术者的满意度:一项全国性研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-11-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCID.S470437
Hend M Al-Atif, Abdulrhman Mohammed Alqarni, Abdularhman Abdullah Almuntashiri, Ali Saad Almuntashiri, Maram Ahmed Almarhabi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯皮肤科诊所接受面部填充美容手术者的满意度:一项全国性研究。","authors":"Hend M Al-Atif, Abdulrhman Mohammed Alqarni, Abdularhman Abdullah Almuntashiri, Ali Saad Almuntashiri, Maram Ahmed Almarhabi","doi":"10.2147/CCID.S470437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Facial cosmetic procedures, known for their rising popularity, frequently yield high patient satisfaction. However, certain patient characteristics may influence this satisfaction. Additionally, patients' satisfaction can affect their attitudes and preferences toward these procedures and recommendations to others. Our study aimed to assess post-procedure satisfaction among individuals who have undergone cosmetic facial filling procedures at dermatology clinics.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study targeted the Saudi population who had undergone cosmetic facial filling procedures, excluding individuals under 18, those with a history of mental health disorders, or invasive surgical procedures, as well as those unable or unwilling to provide informed consent. Data were collected using a comprehensive questionnaire covering demographics, procedure details, satisfaction, and future plans. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess self-perception and satisfaction. The questionnaire was developed after expert consultation and a literature review, with overall satisfaction calculated as the mean of all items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 408 participants in Saudi Arabia, predominantly young, unmarried females, high satisfaction levels were observed following cosmetic facial filling procedures, with a mean score of 3.9 for procedure results and 3.8 for meeting expectations. Most participants were Saudi nationals (97.8%), aged below 25 (41.7%), and held Bachelor's degrees (80.6%), with a majority being females (87.7%). Notably, factors significantly affecting overall satisfaction included gender (p = 0.001), marital status (p = 0.023), income (p = 0.031), procedure duration (p = 0.003), and procedure type (p = 0.046). These findings offer crucial insights for enhancing patient experiences and outcomes in cosmetic facial filling procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study unveiled substantial self-satisfaction levels, particularly regarding appearance and social well-being, emphasizing the significance of informative pre-procedure guidance, while gender, marital status, income, procedure duration, and type significantly impacted satisfaction. Healthcare providers must heed these factors to enhance patient contentment and overall procedure success.</p>","PeriodicalId":10447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satisfaction Among Recipients of Cosmetic Facial Filling Procedures at Dermatology Clinics in Saudi Arabia: A National Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hend M Al-Atif, Abdulrhman Mohammed Alqarni, Abdularhman Abdullah Almuntashiri, Ali Saad Almuntashiri, Maram Ahmed Almarhabi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CCID.S470437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Facial cosmetic procedures, known for their rising popularity, frequently yield high patient satisfaction. However, certain patient characteristics may influence this satisfaction. Additionally, patients' satisfaction can affect their attitudes and preferences toward these procedures and recommendations to others. Our study aimed to assess post-procedure satisfaction among individuals who have undergone cosmetic facial filling procedures at dermatology clinics.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study targeted the Saudi population who had undergone cosmetic facial filling procedures, excluding individuals under 18, those with a history of mental health disorders, or invasive surgical procedures, as well as those unable or unwilling to provide informed consent. Data were collected using a comprehensive questionnaire covering demographics, procedure details, satisfaction, and future plans. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess self-perception and satisfaction. The questionnaire was developed after expert consultation and a literature review, with overall satisfaction calculated as the mean of all items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 408 participants in Saudi Arabia, predominantly young, unmarried females, high satisfaction levels were observed following cosmetic facial filling procedures, with a mean score of 3.9 for procedure results and 3.8 for meeting expectations. Most participants were Saudi nationals (97.8%), aged below 25 (41.7%), and held Bachelor's degrees (80.6%), with a majority being females (87.7%). Notably, factors significantly affecting overall satisfaction included gender (p = 0.001), marital status (p = 0.023), income (p = 0.031), procedure duration (p = 0.003), and procedure type (p = 0.046). These findings offer crucial insights for enhancing patient experiences and outcomes in cosmetic facial filling procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study unveiled substantial self-satisfaction levels, particularly regarding appearance and social well-being, emphasizing the significance of informative pre-procedure guidance, while gender, marital status, income, procedure duration, and type significantly impacted satisfaction. Healthcare providers must heed these factors to enhance patient contentment and overall procedure success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539680/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S470437\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S470437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:面部整容手术因其日益流行而闻名,患者满意度通常很高。然而,患者的某些特征可能会影响其满意度。此外,患者的满意度也会影响他们对这些手术的态度和偏好,以及对他人的推荐。我们的研究旨在评估在皮肤科诊所接受过面部填充美容手术的患者的术后满意度:这项横断面研究的对象是接受过面部填充美容手术的沙特人,但不包括未满 18 岁者、有精神疾病史者或接受过侵入性外科手术者,以及无法或不愿提供知情同意书者。数据收集采用综合问卷的形式,内容包括人口统计学、手术细节、满意度和未来计划。采用 5 点李克特量表来评估自我感觉和满意度。问卷是在咨询专家和查阅文献后编制的,总体满意度按所有项目的平均值计算:在这项对沙特阿拉伯 408 名参与者(主要是未婚的年轻女性)进行的研究中,观察到面部填充美容手术后的满意度很高,对手术效果的平均评分为 3.9 分,对达到期望值的平均评分为 3.8 分。大多数参与者为沙特国民(97.8%),年龄在 25 岁以下(41.7%),拥有学士学位(80.6%),其中女性占多数(87.7%)。值得注意的是,明显影响总体满意度的因素包括性别(p = 0.001)、婚姻状况(p = 0.023)、收入(p = 0.031)、手术持续时间(p = 0.003)和手术类型(p = 0.046)。这些发现为改善面部填充美容手术的患者体验和效果提供了重要启示:本研究揭示了大量的自我满意度,尤其是在外观和社会福利方面,强调了手术前信息指导的重要性,而性别、婚姻状况、收入、手术持续时间和类型则对满意度有显著影响。医疗服务提供者必须注意这些因素,以提高患者的满意度和整个手术的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Satisfaction Among Recipients of Cosmetic Facial Filling Procedures at Dermatology Clinics in Saudi Arabia: A National Study.

Purpose: Facial cosmetic procedures, known for their rising popularity, frequently yield high patient satisfaction. However, certain patient characteristics may influence this satisfaction. Additionally, patients' satisfaction can affect their attitudes and preferences toward these procedures and recommendations to others. Our study aimed to assess post-procedure satisfaction among individuals who have undergone cosmetic facial filling procedures at dermatology clinics.

Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study targeted the Saudi population who had undergone cosmetic facial filling procedures, excluding individuals under 18, those with a history of mental health disorders, or invasive surgical procedures, as well as those unable or unwilling to provide informed consent. Data were collected using a comprehensive questionnaire covering demographics, procedure details, satisfaction, and future plans. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess self-perception and satisfaction. The questionnaire was developed after expert consultation and a literature review, with overall satisfaction calculated as the mean of all items.

Results: In this study of 408 participants in Saudi Arabia, predominantly young, unmarried females, high satisfaction levels were observed following cosmetic facial filling procedures, with a mean score of 3.9 for procedure results and 3.8 for meeting expectations. Most participants were Saudi nationals (97.8%), aged below 25 (41.7%), and held Bachelor's degrees (80.6%), with a majority being females (87.7%). Notably, factors significantly affecting overall satisfaction included gender (p = 0.001), marital status (p = 0.023), income (p = 0.031), procedure duration (p = 0.003), and procedure type (p = 0.046). These findings offer crucial insights for enhancing patient experiences and outcomes in cosmetic facial filling procedures.

Conclusion: This study unveiled substantial self-satisfaction levels, particularly regarding appearance and social well-being, emphasizing the significance of informative pre-procedure guidance, while gender, marital status, income, procedure duration, and type significantly impacted satisfaction. Healthcare providers must heed these factors to enhance patient contentment and overall procedure success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the latest clinical and experimental research in all aspects of skin disease and cosmetic interventions. Normal and pathological processes in skin development and aging, their modification and treatment, as well as basic research into histology of dermal and dermal structures that provide clinical insights and potential treatment options are key topics for the journal. Patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new management options to optimize outcomes for target conditions constitute major areas of interest. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of clinical studies, reviews and original research in skin research and skin care. All areas of dermatology will be covered; contributions will be welcomed from all clinicians and basic science researchers globally.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Properties of a Dual-Effect Facial Injectable: From Preclinical Data to Real-World Evidence. Association Between Non-HDL to HDL Cholesterol Ratio (NHHR) and Psoriasis in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using 2009-2014 Data. Unexpected Repigmentation of Vitiligo Universalis Following Hemodialysis Initiation: A Rare Case Report and Literature Overview. FOXN3 Regulates Autophagic Activity to Suppress Drug Resistance in Melanoma Cells. An Overview of Commonly Used Natural Alternatives for the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia, with Special Emphasis on Rosemary Oil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1