慢性自发性荨麻疹患者使用 150 毫克和 300 毫克剂量的奥马珠单抗的长期疗效和成本效益比较。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Anais brasileiros de dermatologia Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.abd.2024.02.006
Fikriye Kalkan, Sait Yeşillik, Fevzi Demirel, Ezgi Sönmez, Yasemin Balaban, Mustafa İlker İnan, Özgür Kartal
{"title":"慢性自发性荨麻疹患者使用 150 毫克和 300 毫克剂量的奥马珠单抗的长期疗效和成本效益比较。","authors":"Fikriye Kalkan, Sait Yeşillik, Fevzi Demirel, Ezgi Sönmez, Yasemin Balaban, Mustafa İlker İnan, Özgür Kartal","doi":"10.1016/j.abd.2024.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a clinical condition that affects patients quality of life. Omalizumab is preferred in antihistamines resistant CSU cases. Urticaria activity score-7 (UAS-7) is a scale that shows the severity of the disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aimed to compare the long-term (60 months) efficacy and side effects of 150 mg and 300 mg doses of omalizumab in patients with CSU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>108 patients followed up at the clinic with the diagnosis of CSU were included. Omalizumab was started in patients who were resistant to conventional CSU treatment. Two groups were formed to receive 150 mg and 300 mg doses of omalizumab. Urticaria activity score (UAS-7), antihistamine usage, time to achieve disease-free stage, relapse after treatment, and side effects of omalizumab treatment were compared in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding basal characteristics and laboratory findings. Average follow-up time was sixty months. UAS-7 scores were similar in the follow-up. There were no adverse events in both groups.</p><p><strong>Study limitations: </strong>Retroactive design and single-center nature to reach a more significant number of patients. Lack of patients receiving the lowest dose 75 mg and the highest dose 600 mg of omalizumab. Absence of total body mass indexes of all patients. Besides, the use of distinct drugs may contribute to non confident results and is another limitation of this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since there is no significant difference between 150-300 mg omalizumab doses regarding long-term treatment efficacy and side effects in CSU patients, starting treatment with a 150 mg dose may be suitable. In patients who do not respond to 150 mg, the omalizumab dose can be increased to 300 mg. It will prevent unpredictable dose and time-dependent complications and will be a cost-effective approach even in strong economies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7787,"journal":{"name":"Anais brasileiros de dermatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of long term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in 150 mg and 300 mg doses in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.\",\"authors\":\"Fikriye Kalkan, Sait Yeşillik, Fevzi Demirel, Ezgi Sönmez, Yasemin Balaban, Mustafa İlker İnan, Özgür Kartal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.abd.2024.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a clinical condition that affects patients quality of life. Omalizumab is preferred in antihistamines resistant CSU cases. Urticaria activity score-7 (UAS-7) is a scale that shows the severity of the disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aimed to compare the long-term (60 months) efficacy and side effects of 150 mg and 300 mg doses of omalizumab in patients with CSU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>108 patients followed up at the clinic with the diagnosis of CSU were included. Omalizumab was started in patients who were resistant to conventional CSU treatment. Two groups were formed to receive 150 mg and 300 mg doses of omalizumab. Urticaria activity score (UAS-7), antihistamine usage, time to achieve disease-free stage, relapse after treatment, and side effects of omalizumab treatment were compared in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding basal characteristics and laboratory findings. Average follow-up time was sixty months. UAS-7 scores were similar in the follow-up. There were no adverse events in both groups.</p><p><strong>Study limitations: </strong>Retroactive design and single-center nature to reach a more significant number of patients. Lack of patients receiving the lowest dose 75 mg and the highest dose 600 mg of omalizumab. Absence of total body mass indexes of all patients. Besides, the use of distinct drugs may contribute to non confident results and is another limitation of this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since there is no significant difference between 150-300 mg omalizumab doses regarding long-term treatment efficacy and side effects in CSU patients, starting treatment with a 150 mg dose may be suitable. In patients who do not respond to 150 mg, the omalizumab dose can be increased to 300 mg. It will prevent unpredictable dose and time-dependent complications and will be a cost-effective approach even in strong economies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais brasileiros de dermatologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais brasileiros de dermatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2024.02.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais brasileiros de dermatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2024.02.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)是一种影响患者生活质量的临床症状。抗组胺药耐药的 CSU 病例首选奥马珠单抗。荨麻疹活动评分-7(UAS-7)是一种显示疾病严重程度的量表:作者旨在比较 150 毫克和 300 毫克剂量的奥马珠单抗对 CSU 患者的长期(60 个月)疗效和副作用。对常规CSU治疗耐药的患者开始使用奥马珠单抗。两组患者分别接受150毫克和300毫克剂量的奥马珠单抗治疗。比较了两组患者的荨麻疹活动评分(UAS-7)、抗组胺药用量、达到无病期的时间、治疗后复发情况以及奥马珠单抗治疗的副作用:结果:两组患者的基本特征和实验室检查结果无明显统计学差异。平均随访时间为 60 个月。随访期间的 UAS-7 评分相似。两组患者均未出现不良反应:研究的局限性:追溯性设计和单中心性质,无法覆盖更多患者。缺乏接受最低剂量75毫克和最高剂量600毫克奥马珠单抗的患者。缺少所有患者的总体重指数。此外,使用不同的药物可能会导致结果不确定,这也是本研究的另一个局限性:由于150-300毫克剂量的奥马珠单抗在CSU患者的长期疗效和副作用方面没有明显差异,因此从150毫克剂量开始治疗可能是合适的。如果患者对 150 毫克的剂量没有反应,可将奥马珠单抗的剂量增加到 300 毫克。这将避免出现不可预测的剂量和时间依赖性并发症,即使在经济实力雄厚的国家也是一种具有成本效益的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of long term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of omalizumab in 150 mg and 300 mg doses in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a clinical condition that affects patients quality of life. Omalizumab is preferred in antihistamines resistant CSU cases. Urticaria activity score-7 (UAS-7) is a scale that shows the severity of the disease.

Objectives: The authors aimed to compare the long-term (60 months) efficacy and side effects of 150 mg and 300 mg doses of omalizumab in patients with CSU.

Methods: 108 patients followed up at the clinic with the diagnosis of CSU were included. Omalizumab was started in patients who were resistant to conventional CSU treatment. Two groups were formed to receive 150 mg and 300 mg doses of omalizumab. Urticaria activity score (UAS-7), antihistamine usage, time to achieve disease-free stage, relapse after treatment, and side effects of omalizumab treatment were compared in the two groups.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding basal characteristics and laboratory findings. Average follow-up time was sixty months. UAS-7 scores were similar in the follow-up. There were no adverse events in both groups.

Study limitations: Retroactive design and single-center nature to reach a more significant number of patients. Lack of patients receiving the lowest dose 75 mg and the highest dose 600 mg of omalizumab. Absence of total body mass indexes of all patients. Besides, the use of distinct drugs may contribute to non confident results and is another limitation of this study.

Conclusion: Since there is no significant difference between 150-300 mg omalizumab doses regarding long-term treatment efficacy and side effects in CSU patients, starting treatment with a 150 mg dose may be suitable. In patients who do not respond to 150 mg, the omalizumab dose can be increased to 300 mg. It will prevent unpredictable dose and time-dependent complications and will be a cost-effective approach even in strong economies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The journal is published bimonthly and is devoted to the dissemination of original, unpublished technical-scientific study, resulting from research or reviews of dermatological topics and related matters. Exchanges with other publications may be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the reality of exosomes in dermatology. Clinical and epidemiological characterization of demodicosis cases in the pediatric population at the Hospital Clinic of the University of Chile (2013‒2020). Skin cancer after heart transplantation: a systematic review. The exposome impact on hair health: etiology, pathogenesis and clinical features ‒ Part I. Brazilian experience with oral atenolol in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1