肝切除术后当天出院:可以安全地做到吗?

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12076
Zain Kashif, Sayed Imtiaz, Saif Ahmed, Juliet Emamaullee, Mohd Raashid Sheikh
{"title":"肝切除术后当天出院:可以安全地做到吗?","authors":"Zain Kashif, Sayed Imtiaz, Saif Ahmed, Juliet Emamaullee, Mohd Raashid Sheikh","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery pathways, outpatient surgery is becoming increasingly common, but has not yet been extensively described in liver surgery. The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient hepatectomy in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic, elective hepatectomy from 2014 to 2021. Patients discharged on postoperative day 0 were assigned to the \"same-day discharge\" group, otherwise the patient was considered \"admitted.\" Postoperative outcomes were compared with propensity-matched analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of postoperative LOS (length of stay).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7279 patients, of which 361 were in the same-day discharge cohort and 6918 were in the admitted cohort. For admitted patients, median postoperative length of stay was three days (SD = 6). Same-day discharge patients tended to be younger (age 59 vs. 62, p = .034) and more often ASA class ≤2 (49% vs. 29%, p < .001). Comorbidities such as hypertension (40% vs. 45%, p = .048) and diabetes (12% vs. 19%, p = .002) were less common in the same-day discharge cohort. On propensity-matched comparison, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (p > .9), 30-day readmission (p = .2), and overall postoperative complication rate (p = .2). Predictors of longer postoperative LOS included longer operative time, inpatient hospital status, preoperative transfusion, dependent functional status, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that for low-risk patients and uncomplicated cases, same-day discharge after minimally invasive, elective hepatectomy is feasible without compromising patient safety and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same day discharge after hepatectomy: Can it be done safely?\",\"authors\":\"Zain Kashif, Sayed Imtiaz, Saif Ahmed, Juliet Emamaullee, Mohd Raashid Sheikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery pathways, outpatient surgery is becoming increasingly common, but has not yet been extensively described in liver surgery. The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient hepatectomy in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic, elective hepatectomy from 2014 to 2021. Patients discharged on postoperative day 0 were assigned to the \\\"same-day discharge\\\" group, otherwise the patient was considered \\\"admitted.\\\" Postoperative outcomes were compared with propensity-matched analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of postoperative LOS (length of stay).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7279 patients, of which 361 were in the same-day discharge cohort and 6918 were in the admitted cohort. For admitted patients, median postoperative length of stay was three days (SD = 6). Same-day discharge patients tended to be younger (age 59 vs. 62, p = .034) and more often ASA class ≤2 (49% vs. 29%, p < .001). Comorbidities such as hypertension (40% vs. 45%, p = .048) and diabetes (12% vs. 19%, p = .002) were less common in the same-day discharge cohort. On propensity-matched comparison, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (p > .9), 30-day readmission (p = .2), and overall postoperative complication rate (p = .2). Predictors of longer postoperative LOS included longer operative time, inpatient hospital status, preoperative transfusion, dependent functional status, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that for low-risk patients and uncomplicated cases, same-day discharge after minimally invasive, elective hepatectomy is feasible without compromising patient safety and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着微创技术的出现和恢复途径的改进,门诊手术越来越普遍,但在肝脏手术中还没有广泛的描述。本研究旨在分析美国门诊肝切除术患者的发生率、特征和结果:我们利用国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库,对2014年至2021年期间接受腹腔镜或机器人择期肝切除术的患者进行了调查。术后第0天出院的患者被归入 "当天出院 "组,否则视为 "入院"。术后结果与倾向匹配分析进行比较。进行了多变量分析,以确定术后 LOS(住院时间)的预测因素:我们确定了 7279 名患者,其中 361 名属于当天出院患者,6918 名属于入院患者。入院患者的术后住院时间中位数为三天(SD = 6)。当天出院的患者往往更年轻(59 岁对 62 岁,P = .034),ASA 分级≤2 级的比例更高(49% 对 29%,P .9),30 天再入院率更低(P = .2),术后总并发症发生率更高(P = .2)。术后住院时间延长的预测因素包括手术时间延长、住院状态、术前输血、依赖性功能状态和使用新辅助化疗:我们的研究结果表明,对于低风险患者和不复杂的病例,微创、择期肝切除术后当天出院是可行的,且不会影响患者的安全和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Same day discharge after hepatectomy: Can it be done safely?

Background: With the advent of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery pathways, outpatient surgery is becoming increasingly common, but has not yet been extensively described in liver surgery. The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient hepatectomy in the US.

Methods: We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic, elective hepatectomy from 2014 to 2021. Patients discharged on postoperative day 0 were assigned to the "same-day discharge" group, otherwise the patient was considered "admitted." Postoperative outcomes were compared with propensity-matched analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of postoperative LOS (length of stay).

Results: We identified 7279 patients, of which 361 were in the same-day discharge cohort and 6918 were in the admitted cohort. For admitted patients, median postoperative length of stay was three days (SD = 6). Same-day discharge patients tended to be younger (age 59 vs. 62, p = .034) and more often ASA class ≤2 (49% vs. 29%, p < .001). Comorbidities such as hypertension (40% vs. 45%, p = .048) and diabetes (12% vs. 19%, p = .002) were less common in the same-day discharge cohort. On propensity-matched comparison, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (p > .9), 30-day readmission (p = .2), and overall postoperative complication rate (p = .2). Predictors of longer postoperative LOS included longer operative time, inpatient hospital status, preoperative transfusion, dependent functional status, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that for low-risk patients and uncomplicated cases, same-day discharge after minimally invasive, elective hepatectomy is feasible without compromising patient safety and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Current trends in types of pancreatoduodenectomy: Focus on the advancement of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy with 630 consecutive cases. An artificial intelligence-based recognition model of colorectal liver metastases in intraoperative ultrasonography with improved accuracy through algorithm integration. Intratumoral administration of poly-ICLC enhances the antitumor effects of anti-PD-1. Navigating antibiotic therapy in acute cholangitis: Best practices and new insights. Comprehensive data of 5085 patients newly diagnosed with colorectal liver metastasis between 2013 and 2017: Fourth report of a nationwide survey in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1