极早期药物流产随机试验。

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2401646
Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, John Reynolds-Wright, Helena Kopp Kallner, Helena Hognert, Frida Gyllenberg, Janina Kaislasuo, Anand Tamang, Heera Tuladhar, Clare Boerma, Karen Schimanski, Gillian Gibson, Mette Løkeland, Pia Teleman, Marie Bixo, Mette Mandrup Kjaer, Ervin Kallfa, Johan Bring, Oskari Heikinheimo, Sharon Cameron, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
{"title":"极早期药物流产随机试验。","authors":"Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, John Reynolds-Wright, Helena Kopp Kallner, Helena Hognert, Frida Gyllenberg, Janina Kaislasuo, Anand Tamang, Heera Tuladhar, Clare Boerma, Karen Schimanski, Gillian Gibson, Mette Løkeland, Pia Teleman, Marie Bixo, Mette Mandrup Kjaer, Ervin Kallfa, Johan Bring, Oskari Heikinheimo, Sharon Cameron, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2401646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication abortion, with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, is highly effective and safe. However, there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and safety at very early gestations before a pregnancy can be visualized with ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial involving women requesting medication abortion at up to 42 days of gestation with an unconfirmed intrauterine pregnancy on ultrasound examination (visualized as an empty cavity or a sac-like structure without a yolk sac or embryonic pole). Participants were randomly assigned to either immediate start of abortion (early-start group) or standard-care treatment delayed until intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed (standard group). The primary outcome was complete abortion. The noninferiority margin was set at 3.0 percentage points for the absolute between-group difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1504 women were included at 26 sites in nine countries and were randomly assigned to the early-start group (754 participants) or the standard group (750 participants). In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete abortion occurred in 676 of 710 participants (95.2%) in the early-start group and in 656 of 688 (95.3%) in the standard group; the absolute between-group difference was -0.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.4 to 2.1). Ectopic pregnancies occurred in 10 of 741 participants (1.3%) in the early-start group and in 6 of 724 (0.8%) in the standard group, with one rupture before diagnosis (early-start group). Serious adverse events occurred in 12 of 737 participants (1.6%) in the early-start group and in 5 of 718 (0.7%) in the standard group (P = 0.10); the majority were uncomplicated hospitalizations for treatment of ectopic pregnancy or incomplete abortion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication abortion before confirmed intrauterine pregnancy was noninferior to standard, delayed treatment with respect to complete abortion. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; VEMA EudraCT number, 2018-003675-35; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03989869.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"391 18","pages":"1685-1695"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Trial of Very Early Medication Abortion.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, John Reynolds-Wright, Helena Kopp Kallner, Helena Hognert, Frida Gyllenberg, Janina Kaislasuo, Anand Tamang, Heera Tuladhar, Clare Boerma, Karen Schimanski, Gillian Gibson, Mette Løkeland, Pia Teleman, Marie Bixo, Mette Mandrup Kjaer, Ervin Kallfa, Johan Bring, Oskari Heikinheimo, Sharon Cameron, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2401646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication abortion, with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, is highly effective and safe. However, there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and safety at very early gestations before a pregnancy can be visualized with ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial involving women requesting medication abortion at up to 42 days of gestation with an unconfirmed intrauterine pregnancy on ultrasound examination (visualized as an empty cavity or a sac-like structure without a yolk sac or embryonic pole). Participants were randomly assigned to either immediate start of abortion (early-start group) or standard-care treatment delayed until intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed (standard group). The primary outcome was complete abortion. The noninferiority margin was set at 3.0 percentage points for the absolute between-group difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1504 women were included at 26 sites in nine countries and were randomly assigned to the early-start group (754 participants) or the standard group (750 participants). In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete abortion occurred in 676 of 710 participants (95.2%) in the early-start group and in 656 of 688 (95.3%) in the standard group; the absolute between-group difference was -0.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.4 to 2.1). Ectopic pregnancies occurred in 10 of 741 participants (1.3%) in the early-start group and in 6 of 724 (0.8%) in the standard group, with one rupture before diagnosis (early-start group). Serious adverse events occurred in 12 of 737 participants (1.6%) in the early-start group and in 5 of 718 (0.7%) in the standard group (P = 0.10); the majority were uncomplicated hospitalizations for treatment of ectopic pregnancy or incomplete abortion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication abortion before confirmed intrauterine pregnancy was noninferior to standard, delayed treatment with respect to complete abortion. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; VEMA EudraCT number, 2018-003675-35; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03989869.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"391 18\",\"pages\":\"1685-1695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2401646\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2401646","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:米非司酮和米索前列醇联合应用的药物流产非常有效和安全。然而,目前还没有足够的证据表明,在超声波检查可观察到妊娠之前的早期妊娠中药物流产的有效性和安全性:我们进行了一项多中心、非劣效、随机对照试验,参与试验的女性要求在妊娠 42 天以内进行药物流产,且超声检查未确认宫内妊娠(可视为空腔或无卵黄囊或胚极的囊状结构)。参与者被随机分配到立即开始流产(早期开始组)或标准护理治疗延迟至宫内妊娠确认(标准组)。主要结果是完全流产。组间绝对差异的非劣效差定为 3.0 个百分点:9个国家的26个研究机构共纳入了1504名妇女,她们被随机分配到早期启动组(754名参与者)或标准组(750名参与者)。在意向治疗分析中,早期启动组 710 名参与者中有 676 人(95.2%)完全流产,标准组 688 名参与者中有 656 人(95.3%)完全流产;组间绝对差异为-0.1 个百分点(95% 置信区间,-2.4 至 2.1)。早期启动组的 741 名参与者中有 10 人(1.3%)发生了宫外孕,标准组的 724 名参与者中有 6 人(0.8%)发生了宫外孕,其中一人在确诊前破裂(早期启动组)。早期启动组 737 人中有 12 人(1.6%)发生了严重不良事件,标准组 718 人中有 5 人(0.7%)发生了严重不良事件(P = 0.10);大多数人因治疗宫外孕或不完全流产而住院治疗:结论:就完全流产而言,在确诊宫内妊娠前进行药物流产并不比标准的延迟治疗效果差。(由瑞典研究理事会等机构资助;VEMA EudraCT 编号:2018-003675-35;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03989869)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Randomized Trial of Very Early Medication Abortion.

Background: Medication abortion, with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, is highly effective and safe. However, there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and safety at very early gestations before a pregnancy can be visualized with ultrasonography.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial involving women requesting medication abortion at up to 42 days of gestation with an unconfirmed intrauterine pregnancy on ultrasound examination (visualized as an empty cavity or a sac-like structure without a yolk sac or embryonic pole). Participants were randomly assigned to either immediate start of abortion (early-start group) or standard-care treatment delayed until intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed (standard group). The primary outcome was complete abortion. The noninferiority margin was set at 3.0 percentage points for the absolute between-group difference.

Results: In total, 1504 women were included at 26 sites in nine countries and were randomly assigned to the early-start group (754 participants) or the standard group (750 participants). In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete abortion occurred in 676 of 710 participants (95.2%) in the early-start group and in 656 of 688 (95.3%) in the standard group; the absolute between-group difference was -0.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.4 to 2.1). Ectopic pregnancies occurred in 10 of 741 participants (1.3%) in the early-start group and in 6 of 724 (0.8%) in the standard group, with one rupture before diagnosis (early-start group). Serious adverse events occurred in 12 of 737 participants (1.6%) in the early-start group and in 5 of 718 (0.7%) in the standard group (P = 0.10); the majority were uncomplicated hospitalizations for treatment of ectopic pregnancy or incomplete abortion.

Conclusions: Medication abortion before confirmed intrauterine pregnancy was noninferior to standard, delayed treatment with respect to complete abortion. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; VEMA EudraCT number, 2018-003675-35; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03989869.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Eiffel-by-Night Sign. Invisible Deaths - Mortality among People Experiencing Homelessness. Mind the Sentinel - Applying Patient-Safety Paradigms to Clinician Well-Being. Saint Didacus, Fetal Death, and the Problem of Dual Loyalty. Diagnostic Complexity in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Thrombotic Significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1