罗生门集探索有助于为医学数据提供可信解释

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2024.3443069
Katarzyna Kobylińska;Mateusz Krzyziński;Rafał Machowicz;Mariusz Adamek;Przemysław Biecek
{"title":"罗生门集探索有助于为医学数据提供可信解释","authors":"Katarzyna Kobylińska;Mateusz Krzyziński;Rafał Machowicz;Mariusz Adamek;Przemysław Biecek","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2024.3443069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The machine learning modeling process conventionally results in selecting a single model that maximizes a selected performance metric. However, this approach leads to abandoning a more profound analysis of slightly inferior models. Particularly in medical and healthcare studies, where the objective extends beyond predictions to generation of valuable insights, relying solely on a single model can result in misleading or incomplete conclusions. This problem is particularly pertinent when dealing with a set of models known as \n<italic>Rashomon set</i>\n, with performance close to maximum one. Such a set can be numerous and may contain models describing the data in a different way, which calls for comprehensive analysis. This paper introduces a novel method to explore models in the Rashomon set, extending the conventional modeling approach. We propose the \n<monospace>Rashomon_DETECT</monospace>\n algorithm to detect models with different behavior. It is based on recent developments in the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) field. To quantify differences in variable effects among models, we introduce the Profile Disparity Index (PDI) based on measures from functional data analysis. To illustrate the effectiveness of our approach, we showcase its application on real-world medical problem: predicting survival among hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) patients – a foundational case study. Additionally, we benchmark our approach on other medical data sets, demonstrating its versatility and utility in various contexts. If differently behaving models are detected in the Rashomon set, their combined analysis leads to more trustworthy conclusions, which is of vital importance for high-stakes applications such as medical applications.","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"28 11","pages":"6454-6465"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the Rashomon Set Assists Trustworthy Explanations for Medical Data\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Kobylińska;Mateusz Krzyziński;Rafał Machowicz;Mariusz Adamek;Przemysław Biecek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JBHI.2024.3443069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The machine learning modeling process conventionally results in selecting a single model that maximizes a selected performance metric. However, this approach leads to abandoning a more profound analysis of slightly inferior models. Particularly in medical and healthcare studies, where the objective extends beyond predictions to generation of valuable insights, relying solely on a single model can result in misleading or incomplete conclusions. This problem is particularly pertinent when dealing with a set of models known as \\n<italic>Rashomon set</i>\\n, with performance close to maximum one. Such a set can be numerous and may contain models describing the data in a different way, which calls for comprehensive analysis. This paper introduces a novel method to explore models in the Rashomon set, extending the conventional modeling approach. We propose the \\n<monospace>Rashomon_DETECT</monospace>\\n algorithm to detect models with different behavior. It is based on recent developments in the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) field. To quantify differences in variable effects among models, we introduce the Profile Disparity Index (PDI) based on measures from functional data analysis. To illustrate the effectiveness of our approach, we showcase its application on real-world medical problem: predicting survival among hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) patients – a foundational case study. Additionally, we benchmark our approach on other medical data sets, demonstrating its versatility and utility in various contexts. If differently behaving models are detected in the Rashomon set, their combined analysis leads to more trustworthy conclusions, which is of vital importance for high-stakes applications such as medical applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"28 11\",\"pages\":\"6454-6465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10745964/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10745964/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习建模过程的传统结果是选择一个单一模型,使选定的性能指标最大化。然而,这种方法会导致放弃对略逊一筹的模型进行更深入的分析。特别是在医疗和保健研究中,目标不仅仅是预测,还包括产生有价值的见解,仅仅依靠单一模型可能会导致误导性或不完整的结论。在处理性能接近最大值的一组模型(即罗生门模型集)时,这一问题尤为突出。这样的模型集可能很多,而且可能包含以不同方式描述数据的模型,这就需要进行综合分析。本文介绍了一种探索罗生门集模型的新方法,扩展了传统的建模方法。我们提出了 Rashomon_DETECT 算法来检测具有不同行为的模型。该算法基于可解释人工智能(XAI)领域的最新发展。为了量化模型间变量效应的差异,我们引入了基于功能数据分析的特征差异指数(PDI)。为了说明我们的方法的有效性,我们展示了该方法在实际医疗问题中的应用:预测嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症(HLH)患者的存活率--这是一项基础案例研究。此外,我们还在其他医疗数据集上对我们的方法进行了基准测试,证明了它在各种情况下的通用性和实用性。如果在罗生门集中检测到行为不同的模型,对它们进行综合分析就能得出更可信的结论,这对医疗应用等高风险应用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploration of the Rashomon Set Assists Trustworthy Explanations for Medical Data
The machine learning modeling process conventionally results in selecting a single model that maximizes a selected performance metric. However, this approach leads to abandoning a more profound analysis of slightly inferior models. Particularly in medical and healthcare studies, where the objective extends beyond predictions to generation of valuable insights, relying solely on a single model can result in misleading or incomplete conclusions. This problem is particularly pertinent when dealing with a set of models known as Rashomon set , with performance close to maximum one. Such a set can be numerous and may contain models describing the data in a different way, which calls for comprehensive analysis. This paper introduces a novel method to explore models in the Rashomon set, extending the conventional modeling approach. We propose the Rashomon_DETECT algorithm to detect models with different behavior. It is based on recent developments in the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) field. To quantify differences in variable effects among models, we introduce the Profile Disparity Index (PDI) based on measures from functional data analysis. To illustrate the effectiveness of our approach, we showcase its application on real-world medical problem: predicting survival among hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) patients – a foundational case study. Additionally, we benchmark our approach on other medical data sets, demonstrating its versatility and utility in various contexts. If differently behaving models are detected in the Rashomon set, their combined analysis leads to more trustworthy conclusions, which is of vital importance for high-stakes applications such as medical applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Identification and Classification of Mitosis and Migration of Cancer Cells in a Lab-on-CMOS Capacitance Sensing platform. Biomedical Information Integration via Adaptive Large Language Model Construction. BloodPatrol: Revolutionizing Blood Cancer Diagnosis - Advanced Real-Time Detection Leveraging Deep Learning & Cloud Technologies. EEG Detection and Prediction of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease Based on Spatiotemporal Coherent Modes. Functional Data Analysis of Hand Rotation for Open Surgical Suturing Skill Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1