{"title":"了解未来收养父母的决策过程:混合方法研究","authors":"Bethany Willis, Katie Hrapczynski, Cheryl Fortner","doi":"10.1111/fare.13076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study explores prospective adoptive parents' conceptions by testing hypotheses based on a decision-making model proposed by Willis Hepp and colleagues grounded in symbolic interaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple factors inform decisions to adopt. However, little is known about the decision-making process as prospective adoptive parents consider this option.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen prospective adoptive parents were recruited using purposive sampling. An advanced concurrent mixed-methods design was used to integrate findings from semistructured interviews and a survey using the FACES IV to generate more complete conclusions regarding the model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ten themes emerged related to prospective parents' conceptions of self and generalized others, including internalization of adoption as part of one's self, referencing families of origin in family formation thinking, and personal histories informing future visions. Pronatal, biological social pressures echo in families of origin that, combined with religious and other social experiences, impact decision-making. Family cohesion, flexibility, and communication vary based on where they fall along a spectrum of decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Conceptions of self and others inform decision-making, where some choose, and others wait or opt out of, adoptive parenthood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>It behooves practitioners to differentiate supports for individuals thinking about transition to adoptive parenthood based on their conceptions of self and generalized others.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 5","pages":"2961-2980"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding decision-making processes of prospective adoptive parents: A mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Willis, Katie Hrapczynski, Cheryl Fortner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.13076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study explores prospective adoptive parents' conceptions by testing hypotheses based on a decision-making model proposed by Willis Hepp and colleagues grounded in symbolic interaction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple factors inform decisions to adopt. However, little is known about the decision-making process as prospective adoptive parents consider this option.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventeen prospective adoptive parents were recruited using purposive sampling. An advanced concurrent mixed-methods design was used to integrate findings from semistructured interviews and a survey using the FACES IV to generate more complete conclusions regarding the model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten themes emerged related to prospective parents' conceptions of self and generalized others, including internalization of adoption as part of one's self, referencing families of origin in family formation thinking, and personal histories informing future visions. Pronatal, biological social pressures echo in families of origin that, combined with religious and other social experiences, impact decision-making. Family cohesion, flexibility, and communication vary based on where they fall along a spectrum of decision-making.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Conceptions of self and others inform decision-making, where some choose, and others wait or opt out of, adoptive parenthood.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>It behooves practitioners to differentiate supports for individuals thinking about transition to adoptive parenthood based on their conceptions of self and generalized others.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"2961-2980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding decision-making processes of prospective adoptive parents: A mixed-methods study
Objective
This study explores prospective adoptive parents' conceptions by testing hypotheses based on a decision-making model proposed by Willis Hepp and colleagues grounded in symbolic interaction.
Background
Multiple factors inform decisions to adopt. However, little is known about the decision-making process as prospective adoptive parents consider this option.
Method
Seventeen prospective adoptive parents were recruited using purposive sampling. An advanced concurrent mixed-methods design was used to integrate findings from semistructured interviews and a survey using the FACES IV to generate more complete conclusions regarding the model.
Results
Ten themes emerged related to prospective parents' conceptions of self and generalized others, including internalization of adoption as part of one's self, referencing families of origin in family formation thinking, and personal histories informing future visions. Pronatal, biological social pressures echo in families of origin that, combined with religious and other social experiences, impact decision-making. Family cohesion, flexibility, and communication vary based on where they fall along a spectrum of decision-making.
Conclusion
Conceptions of self and others inform decision-making, where some choose, and others wait or opt out of, adoptive parenthood.
Implications
It behooves practitioners to differentiate supports for individuals thinking about transition to adoptive parenthood based on their conceptions of self and generalized others.
期刊介绍:
A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.