了解未来收养父母的决策过程:混合方法研究

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Family Relations Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/fare.13076
Bethany Willis, Katie Hrapczynski, Cheryl Fortner
{"title":"了解未来收养父母的决策过程:混合方法研究","authors":"Bethany Willis,&nbsp;Katie Hrapczynski,&nbsp;Cheryl Fortner","doi":"10.1111/fare.13076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study explores prospective adoptive parents' conceptions by testing hypotheses based on a decision-making model proposed by Willis Hepp and colleagues grounded in symbolic interaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple factors inform decisions to adopt. However, little is known about the decision-making process as prospective adoptive parents consider this option.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen prospective adoptive parents were recruited using purposive sampling. An advanced concurrent mixed-methods design was used to integrate findings from semistructured interviews and a survey using the FACES IV to generate more complete conclusions regarding the model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ten themes emerged related to prospective parents' conceptions of self and generalized others, including internalization of adoption as part of one's self, referencing families of origin in family formation thinking, and personal histories informing future visions. Pronatal, biological social pressures echo in families of origin that, combined with religious and other social experiences, impact decision-making. Family cohesion, flexibility, and communication vary based on where they fall along a spectrum of decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Conceptions of self and others inform decision-making, where some choose, and others wait or opt out of, adoptive parenthood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>It behooves practitioners to differentiate supports for individuals thinking about transition to adoptive parenthood based on their conceptions of self and generalized others.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 5","pages":"2961-2980"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding decision-making processes of prospective adoptive parents: A mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Willis,&nbsp;Katie Hrapczynski,&nbsp;Cheryl Fortner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.13076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study explores prospective adoptive parents' conceptions by testing hypotheses based on a decision-making model proposed by Willis Hepp and colleagues grounded in symbolic interaction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple factors inform decisions to adopt. However, little is known about the decision-making process as prospective adoptive parents consider this option.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventeen prospective adoptive parents were recruited using purposive sampling. An advanced concurrent mixed-methods design was used to integrate findings from semistructured interviews and a survey using the FACES IV to generate more complete conclusions regarding the model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten themes emerged related to prospective parents' conceptions of self and generalized others, including internalization of adoption as part of one's self, referencing families of origin in family formation thinking, and personal histories informing future visions. Pronatal, biological social pressures echo in families of origin that, combined with religious and other social experiences, impact decision-making. Family cohesion, flexibility, and communication vary based on where they fall along a spectrum of decision-making.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Conceptions of self and others inform decision-making, where some choose, and others wait or opt out of, adoptive parenthood.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>It behooves practitioners to differentiate supports for individuals thinking about transition to adoptive parenthood based on their conceptions of self and generalized others.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"2961-2980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究通过检验基于 Willis Hepp 及其同事提出的以符号互动为基础的决策模型的假设,探讨未来收养父母的观念。 背景 领养决定是由多种因素促成的。然而,人们对准收养父母在考虑这一选择时的决策过程知之甚少。 方法 采用目的性抽样法招募了 17 位准收养父母。我们采用了先进的并行混合方法设计,将半结构式访谈和使用 FACES IV 进行的调查的结果整合在一起,以得出更完整的模型结论。 结果 发现了十个与未来父母对自我和他人的概念有关的主题,包括将收养内化为自我的一部分、在组建家庭时参考原生家庭以及个人历史对未来的影响。原生家庭中的产前、生理社会压力与宗教和其他社会经验相结合,对决策产生影响。家庭的凝聚力、灵活性和沟通因其在决策过程中所处的位置而有所不同。 结论 对自我和他人的认识会影响决策,在决策过程中,有些人选择收养子女,有些人则等待或选择放弃。 启示 实践者应根据个人对自我和他人的认知,为考虑过渡到收养父母身份的个人提供不同的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding decision-making processes of prospective adoptive parents: A mixed-methods study

Objective

This study explores prospective adoptive parents' conceptions by testing hypotheses based on a decision-making model proposed by Willis Hepp and colleagues grounded in symbolic interaction.

Background

Multiple factors inform decisions to adopt. However, little is known about the decision-making process as prospective adoptive parents consider this option.

Method

Seventeen prospective adoptive parents were recruited using purposive sampling. An advanced concurrent mixed-methods design was used to integrate findings from semistructured interviews and a survey using the FACES IV to generate more complete conclusions regarding the model.

Results

Ten themes emerged related to prospective parents' conceptions of self and generalized others, including internalization of adoption as part of one's self, referencing families of origin in family formation thinking, and personal histories informing future visions. Pronatal, biological social pressures echo in families of origin that, combined with religious and other social experiences, impact decision-making. Family cohesion, flexibility, and communication vary based on where they fall along a spectrum of decision-making.

Conclusion

Conceptions of self and others inform decision-making, where some choose, and others wait or opt out of, adoptive parenthood.

Implications

It behooves practitioners to differentiate supports for individuals thinking about transition to adoptive parenthood based on their conceptions of self and generalized others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Parental childhood adversity and emotional functioning: Associations with child's emotion regulation Socialization of adolescent emotion regulation through interparental conflict: Adolescent versus parent report Family communication patterns and networking behavior: A moderated mediation model A preventive intervention promoting toddlers' self-regulation improves parental resilience in the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1