中国海域重建海平面数据集的综合比较分析:验潮仪和卫星测高的启示

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.3389/fmars.2024.1469173
Shuwei Zhang, Yanxiao Li, Jianlong Feng, Yiyang Jin, Jing Zhang, Liang Zhao
{"title":"中国海域重建海平面数据集的综合比较分析:验潮仪和卫星测高的启示","authors":"Shuwei Zhang, Yanxiao Li, Jianlong Feng, Yiyang Jin, Jing Zhang, Liang Zhao","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2024.1469173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, there are many reconstructed datasets at the global scale. To test the applicability of these datasets in the China seas, the study comprehensively analyzes the reliability and accuracy of reconstructed sea level datasets in capturing nuanced temporal patterns of sea level changes in the China Seas. This study applied analysis methods or indicators such as time series, Taylor plots, correlation coefficients, growth rates, and standard deviations. Ocean Data Assimilations (ODAs) outperform Tide Gauge Reconstructions (TGRs) in terms of correlation with measured data in the nearshore, while TGRs exhibit superior capability in capturing oceanic sea level variability. Although the ODAs and TGRs both suffer from the underestimation of sea level variability in China as well as in neighboring seas, the TGRs perform better than the former. ODAs show inconsistency in reflecting the rate of sea level rise, but they, particularly the China Ocean Reanalysis (CORA), demonstrate a better correlation with satellite altimetry datasets. Meanwhile, both of them can reflect the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) well. TGRs, relying on oceanic tide gauge stations, suffer from poor correlation with tide gauge stations due to limited coverage. Reconstruction discrepancies are attributed to methodological differences and data assimilation techniques. Future studies should explore alternative variables like sea surface temperature and so on to enhance sea-level reconstruction, especially in regions with sparse tide gauge coverage.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive comparative analysis of reconstructed sea level datasets in the China Seas: insights from tide gauge and satellite altimetry\",\"authors\":\"Shuwei Zhang, Yanxiao Li, Jianlong Feng, Yiyang Jin, Jing Zhang, Liang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmars.2024.1469173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At present, there are many reconstructed datasets at the global scale. To test the applicability of these datasets in the China seas, the study comprehensively analyzes the reliability and accuracy of reconstructed sea level datasets in capturing nuanced temporal patterns of sea level changes in the China Seas. This study applied analysis methods or indicators such as time series, Taylor plots, correlation coefficients, growth rates, and standard deviations. Ocean Data Assimilations (ODAs) outperform Tide Gauge Reconstructions (TGRs) in terms of correlation with measured data in the nearshore, while TGRs exhibit superior capability in capturing oceanic sea level variability. Although the ODAs and TGRs both suffer from the underestimation of sea level variability in China as well as in neighboring seas, the TGRs perform better than the former. ODAs show inconsistency in reflecting the rate of sea level rise, but they, particularly the China Ocean Reanalysis (CORA), demonstrate a better correlation with satellite altimetry datasets. Meanwhile, both of them can reflect the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) well. TGRs, relying on oceanic tide gauge stations, suffer from poor correlation with tide gauge stations due to limited coverage. Reconstruction discrepancies are attributed to methodological differences and data assimilation techniques. Future studies should explore alternative variables like sea surface temperature and so on to enhance sea-level reconstruction, especially in regions with sparse tide gauge coverage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1469173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1469173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,全球范围内有许多重建数据集。为了检验这些数据集在中国海域的适用性,本研究全面分析了重建海平面数据集在捕捉中国海域海平面细微时间变化规律方面的可靠性和准确性。该研究采用了时间序列、泰勒图、相关系数、增长率和标准偏差等分析方法或指标。在与近岸实测数据的相关性方面,海洋数据同化(ODA)优于潮位仪重建(TGR),而潮位仪重建在捕捉海洋海平面变化方面表现出更强的能力。虽然 ODA 和 TGR 都存在低估中国及邻近海域海平面变化的问题,但 TGR 的表现优于前者。ODAs 在反映海平面上升速率方面表现出不一致性,但它们,特别是中国海洋再分析(CORA),与卫星测高数据集的相关性较好。同时,它们都能很好地反映太平洋十年涛动(PDO)。依靠海洋验潮站的 TGRs 由于覆盖范围有限,与验潮站的相关性较差。重建差异可归因于方法差异和数据同化技术。未来的研究应探索海面温度等替代变量,以加强海平面重建,特别是在验潮站覆盖稀少的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive comparative analysis of reconstructed sea level datasets in the China Seas: insights from tide gauge and satellite altimetry
At present, there are many reconstructed datasets at the global scale. To test the applicability of these datasets in the China seas, the study comprehensively analyzes the reliability and accuracy of reconstructed sea level datasets in capturing nuanced temporal patterns of sea level changes in the China Seas. This study applied analysis methods or indicators such as time series, Taylor plots, correlation coefficients, growth rates, and standard deviations. Ocean Data Assimilations (ODAs) outperform Tide Gauge Reconstructions (TGRs) in terms of correlation with measured data in the nearshore, while TGRs exhibit superior capability in capturing oceanic sea level variability. Although the ODAs and TGRs both suffer from the underestimation of sea level variability in China as well as in neighboring seas, the TGRs perform better than the former. ODAs show inconsistency in reflecting the rate of sea level rise, but they, particularly the China Ocean Reanalysis (CORA), demonstrate a better correlation with satellite altimetry datasets. Meanwhile, both of them can reflect the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) well. TGRs, relying on oceanic tide gauge stations, suffer from poor correlation with tide gauge stations due to limited coverage. Reconstruction discrepancies are attributed to methodological differences and data assimilation techniques. Future studies should explore alternative variables like sea surface temperature and so on to enhance sea-level reconstruction, especially in regions with sparse tide gauge coverage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1