有机少耕系统中的覆盖种植:最大化土壤覆盖还是植物地上生物量输入?

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1111/ejss.70012
Simon Oberholzer, Klaus A. Jarosch, Nadine Harder, Markus Steffens, Chinwe Ifejika Speranza
{"title":"有机少耕系统中的覆盖种植:最大化土壤覆盖还是植物地上生物量输入?","authors":"Simon Oberholzer,&nbsp;Klaus A. Jarosch,&nbsp;Nadine Harder,&nbsp;Markus Steffens,&nbsp;Chinwe Ifejika Speranza","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crops are grown between two main crops to reduce periods of bare fallow. In highly diverse crop rotations, the lengths of break periods between two main crops vary highly over time and consequently the cover cropping management differs from year to year. Long-term field trials are thus of limited use because the same cover cropping approach only appears once in several years. This increases the need to better determine the immediate effects of different cover cropping strategies on soil properties. This study evaluated two cover cropping strategies and monitored the temporal development of several soil properties on six fields in Eastern Switzerland in the 9 months period between harvest of winter wheat and sowing of spring crops. The two tested strategies were (a) double cover cropping (DCC) where two cover crops mixtures were grown subsequently and shallowly (3 cm) incorporated into the topsoil and (b) permanent soil cover (PSC) with one grass-clover mixture, which was harvested and thus not incorporated into the soil. Soil samples at three different soil depths (0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 cm) were sampled four times in high spatial resolution and analysed using a combined approach of visible near infrared spectroscopy and conventional lab methods. Differences between the sampling times and field sites were stronger than effects of different treatments. For soil organic carbon (SOC), no significant difference was measured between treatments in 0–20 cm soil depth. Only when analysed per depth segment, the PSC treatment showed significantly higher SOC increase in 5–10 cm soil depth than the DCC treatment. This could be due to the longer soil cover and thereby associated longer root growth period in the PSC treatment, leading to higher below ground C inputs than in the DCC treatment. On the other hand, the DCC treatment showed generally higher increases in permanganate oxidizable carbon stocks (0–5 cm), microbial C (0–10 cm), microbial N (0–10 cm) and mineral N (0–10 cm) than the PSC treatment. We conclude that maximizing cover crop above ground biomass input by planting two cover crops (DCC) benefitted soil microorganisms on most fields but was less beneficial on SOC than permanent soil cover (PSC) in 5–10 cm soil depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input?\",\"authors\":\"Simon Oberholzer,&nbsp;Klaus A. Jarosch,&nbsp;Nadine Harder,&nbsp;Markus Steffens,&nbsp;Chinwe Ifejika Speranza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cover crops are grown between two main crops to reduce periods of bare fallow. In highly diverse crop rotations, the lengths of break periods between two main crops vary highly over time and consequently the cover cropping management differs from year to year. Long-term field trials are thus of limited use because the same cover cropping approach only appears once in several years. This increases the need to better determine the immediate effects of different cover cropping strategies on soil properties. This study evaluated two cover cropping strategies and monitored the temporal development of several soil properties on six fields in Eastern Switzerland in the 9 months period between harvest of winter wheat and sowing of spring crops. The two tested strategies were (a) double cover cropping (DCC) where two cover crops mixtures were grown subsequently and shallowly (3 cm) incorporated into the topsoil and (b) permanent soil cover (PSC) with one grass-clover mixture, which was harvested and thus not incorporated into the soil. Soil samples at three different soil depths (0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 cm) were sampled four times in high spatial resolution and analysed using a combined approach of visible near infrared spectroscopy and conventional lab methods. Differences between the sampling times and field sites were stronger than effects of different treatments. For soil organic carbon (SOC), no significant difference was measured between treatments in 0–20 cm soil depth. Only when analysed per depth segment, the PSC treatment showed significantly higher SOC increase in 5–10 cm soil depth than the DCC treatment. This could be due to the longer soil cover and thereby associated longer root growth period in the PSC treatment, leading to higher below ground C inputs than in the DCC treatment. On the other hand, the DCC treatment showed generally higher increases in permanganate oxidizable carbon stocks (0–5 cm), microbial C (0–10 cm), microbial N (0–10 cm) and mineral N (0–10 cm) than the PSC treatment. We conclude that maximizing cover crop above ground biomass input by planting two cover crops (DCC) benefitted soil microorganisms on most fields but was less beneficial on SOC than permanent soil cover (PSC) in 5–10 cm soil depth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"75 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在两种主要作物之间种植覆盖作物是为了减少裸露休耕期。在高度多样化的作物轮作中,两种主要作物之间的间歇期长短随时间变化很大,因此每年的覆盖种植管理也不尽相同。因此,长期田间试验的作用有限,因为同样的覆盖种植方法在几年中只会出现一次。这就更需要更好地确定不同覆盖种植策略对土壤特性的直接影响。这项研究评估了两种覆盖种植策略,并监测了瑞士东部六块田地在冬小麦收割到春播作物播种的 9 个月期间几种土壤特性的时间发展情况。测试的两种策略是:(a)双层覆盖种植(DCC),即随后种植两种覆盖作物混合物,并将其浅层(3 厘米)纳入表土;(b)永久性土壤覆盖(PSC),即种植一种草-三叶草混合物,收割后不纳入土壤。对三个不同土壤深度(0-5、5-10 和 10-20 厘米)的土壤样本进行了四次高空间分辨率采样,并采用可见近红外光谱和传统实验室方法进行了综合分析。采样时间和实地地点之间的差异比不同处理方法的影响更大。就土壤有机碳(SOC)而言,在 0-20 厘米的土壤深度,不同处理之间没有测得显著差异。只有在对每个深度段进行分析时,PSC 处理在 5-10 厘米土壤深度的 SOC 增幅明显高于 DCC 处理。这可能是由于 PSC 处理的土壤覆盖时间更长,因此根系生长期也更长,导致地下 C 输入量高于 DCC 处理。另一方面,高锰酸盐氧化碳储量(0-5 厘米)、微生物碳储量(0-10 厘米)、微生物氮储量(0-10 厘米)和矿质氮储量(0-10 厘米)在 DCC 处理中的增幅普遍高于 PSC 处理。我们的结论是,通过种植两种覆盖作物(DCC)最大限度地增加覆盖作物的地上生物量输入,有利于大多数田块的土壤微生物,但与 5-10 厘米土壤深度的永久性土壤覆盖(PSC)相比,对 SOC 的益处较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input?

Cover crops are grown between two main crops to reduce periods of bare fallow. In highly diverse crop rotations, the lengths of break periods between two main crops vary highly over time and consequently the cover cropping management differs from year to year. Long-term field trials are thus of limited use because the same cover cropping approach only appears once in several years. This increases the need to better determine the immediate effects of different cover cropping strategies on soil properties. This study evaluated two cover cropping strategies and monitored the temporal development of several soil properties on six fields in Eastern Switzerland in the 9 months period between harvest of winter wheat and sowing of spring crops. The two tested strategies were (a) double cover cropping (DCC) where two cover crops mixtures were grown subsequently and shallowly (3 cm) incorporated into the topsoil and (b) permanent soil cover (PSC) with one grass-clover mixture, which was harvested and thus not incorporated into the soil. Soil samples at three different soil depths (0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 cm) were sampled four times in high spatial resolution and analysed using a combined approach of visible near infrared spectroscopy and conventional lab methods. Differences between the sampling times and field sites were stronger than effects of different treatments. For soil organic carbon (SOC), no significant difference was measured between treatments in 0–20 cm soil depth. Only when analysed per depth segment, the PSC treatment showed significantly higher SOC increase in 5–10 cm soil depth than the DCC treatment. This could be due to the longer soil cover and thereby associated longer root growth period in the PSC treatment, leading to higher below ground C inputs than in the DCC treatment. On the other hand, the DCC treatment showed generally higher increases in permanganate oxidizable carbon stocks (0–5 cm), microbial C (0–10 cm), microbial N (0–10 cm) and mineral N (0–10 cm) than the PSC treatment. We conclude that maximizing cover crop above ground biomass input by planting two cover crops (DCC) benefitted soil microorganisms on most fields but was less beneficial on SOC than permanent soil cover (PSC) in 5–10 cm soil depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Addition of Fe-humic acids to overcome analytical issues in measurements of isotopically exchangeable P in soil Easily mobilized metals and acidity in acid sulfate soils across the Swedish coastal plains ‘Shifting gears ain't easy’: Disciplinary resistances to perspective shifts in soil science and how to move forward Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input? No relationship between outputs of simple humus balance calculators (VDLUFA and STAND) and soil organic carbon trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1