{"title":"草甘膦和苯甲酸乙酯类杀虫剂对淡水大对虾幼体的生物影响","authors":"Arsène Mathieu Houssou, Togbéadji Fabrice Lokonon, Guillaume Koussovi, Dogbè Clément Adjahouinou, Daniel Cocan, Elie Montchowui","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07602-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emamectin benzoate based insecticide and glyphosate based herbicides are widely used in developing countries for agricultural purposes. The problem lies in the total lack of knowledge of data on their uses as well as the absence of scientific data on the potential effects on local biodiversity. This study evaluates the acute and chronic effects of two commercial formulations EMACOT<sup>®</sup> and SUNPHOSATE-G<sup>®</sup> on juveniles of a prawn species (<i>Macrobrachium macrobrachion</i>) native of large watersheds in Benin. Juveniles with an average weight of 1.49 ± 0.2 g were subjected to six and seven lethal doses of EMACOT<sup>®</sup> and SUNPHOSAT-G<sup>®</sup> respectively. Thus, swimming behavior, loss of mobility and mortality were monitored every hour for 72 h. Then, sub-lethal effects on molting effectiveness, weight and size gain as well as survival were evaluated on juveniles individually exposed to nominal concentrations of 0.06 and 0.11 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> of EMACOT, and 13.99 and 27.98 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> of SUNPHOSATHE-G. The results showed that the LC<sub>50</sub>-72 h of the herbicide formulation on juveniles is 279.76 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> which corresponds to 211.78 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> of glyphosate. That of the insecticide is 1.14 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> corresponding to 0.06 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>of emamectin benzoate. As for the chronic effects, both concentrations of emamectin benzoate prevented the prawn from molting (1 molt at the start of the experiment against 3 molts for the control subjects in 28 days). As a result, weight gain in these two treatments was very low (0.06 and 0.19 g, respectively) compared to 0.66 g in the controls. For glyphosate, findings with 13.99 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> are similar to those of both doses of emamecin benzoate. On the other hand, no significant effect was observed on the effectiveness of molts within 27.98 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> treatment (3 molts in 28 days). The weight gain was 0.11 g and 0.46 g respectively for both glyphosate sub-lethal doses. The results of this study indicate a significant sensitivity of the prawn juveniles to emamectin benzoate (EMACOT) and a relatively low sensitivity to glyphosate (SUNPHOSATE-G). But the risk is significant when these two pesticides are used in the flood plains of large rivers. In developing countries such as Benin, measures must be taken to review current pesticide use practices in large watersheds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological effects of glyphosate and emamectin benzoate based pesticides on the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium macrobrachion juveniles\",\"authors\":\"Arsène Mathieu Houssou, Togbéadji Fabrice Lokonon, Guillaume Koussovi, Dogbè Clément Adjahouinou, Daniel Cocan, Elie Montchowui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-024-07602-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Emamectin benzoate based insecticide and glyphosate based herbicides are widely used in developing countries for agricultural purposes. The problem lies in the total lack of knowledge of data on their uses as well as the absence of scientific data on the potential effects on local biodiversity. This study evaluates the acute and chronic effects of two commercial formulations EMACOT<sup>®</sup> and SUNPHOSATE-G<sup>®</sup> on juveniles of a prawn species (<i>Macrobrachium macrobrachion</i>) native of large watersheds in Benin. Juveniles with an average weight of 1.49 ± 0.2 g were subjected to six and seven lethal doses of EMACOT<sup>®</sup> and SUNPHOSAT-G<sup>®</sup> respectively. Thus, swimming behavior, loss of mobility and mortality were monitored every hour for 72 h. Then, sub-lethal effects on molting effectiveness, weight and size gain as well as survival were evaluated on juveniles individually exposed to nominal concentrations of 0.06 and 0.11 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> of EMACOT, and 13.99 and 27.98 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> of SUNPHOSATHE-G. The results showed that the LC<sub>50</sub>-72 h of the herbicide formulation on juveniles is 279.76 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> which corresponds to 211.78 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> of glyphosate. That of the insecticide is 1.14 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> corresponding to 0.06 mg.L<sup>-1</sup>of emamectin benzoate. As for the chronic effects, both concentrations of emamectin benzoate prevented the prawn from molting (1 molt at the start of the experiment against 3 molts for the control subjects in 28 days). As a result, weight gain in these two treatments was very low (0.06 and 0.19 g, respectively) compared to 0.66 g in the controls. For glyphosate, findings with 13.99 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> are similar to those of both doses of emamecin benzoate. On the other hand, no significant effect was observed on the effectiveness of molts within 27.98 mg.L<sup>-1</sup> treatment (3 molts in 28 days). The weight gain was 0.11 g and 0.46 g respectively for both glyphosate sub-lethal doses. The results of this study indicate a significant sensitivity of the prawn juveniles to emamectin benzoate (EMACOT) and a relatively low sensitivity to glyphosate (SUNPHOSATE-G). But the risk is significant when these two pesticides are used in the flood plains of large rivers. In developing countries such as Benin, measures must be taken to review current pesticide use practices in large watersheds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07602-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07602-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biological effects of glyphosate and emamectin benzoate based pesticides on the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium macrobrachion juveniles
Emamectin benzoate based insecticide and glyphosate based herbicides are widely used in developing countries for agricultural purposes. The problem lies in the total lack of knowledge of data on their uses as well as the absence of scientific data on the potential effects on local biodiversity. This study evaluates the acute and chronic effects of two commercial formulations EMACOT® and SUNPHOSATE-G® on juveniles of a prawn species (Macrobrachium macrobrachion) native of large watersheds in Benin. Juveniles with an average weight of 1.49 ± 0.2 g were subjected to six and seven lethal doses of EMACOT® and SUNPHOSAT-G® respectively. Thus, swimming behavior, loss of mobility and mortality were monitored every hour for 72 h. Then, sub-lethal effects on molting effectiveness, weight and size gain as well as survival were evaluated on juveniles individually exposed to nominal concentrations of 0.06 and 0.11 mg.L-1 of EMACOT, and 13.99 and 27.98 mg.L-1 of SUNPHOSATHE-G. The results showed that the LC50-72 h of the herbicide formulation on juveniles is 279.76 mg.L-1 which corresponds to 211.78 mg.L-1 of glyphosate. That of the insecticide is 1.14 mg.L-1 corresponding to 0.06 mg.L-1of emamectin benzoate. As for the chronic effects, both concentrations of emamectin benzoate prevented the prawn from molting (1 molt at the start of the experiment against 3 molts for the control subjects in 28 days). As a result, weight gain in these two treatments was very low (0.06 and 0.19 g, respectively) compared to 0.66 g in the controls. For glyphosate, findings with 13.99 mg.L-1 are similar to those of both doses of emamecin benzoate. On the other hand, no significant effect was observed on the effectiveness of molts within 27.98 mg.L-1 treatment (3 molts in 28 days). The weight gain was 0.11 g and 0.46 g respectively for both glyphosate sub-lethal doses. The results of this study indicate a significant sensitivity of the prawn juveniles to emamectin benzoate (EMACOT) and a relatively low sensitivity to glyphosate (SUNPHOSATE-G). But the risk is significant when these two pesticides are used in the flood plains of large rivers. In developing countries such as Benin, measures must be taken to review current pesticide use practices in large watersheds.
期刊介绍:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.